Official Game Thread: UT-Martin vs. Oklahoma State

Can we just skip next week? Oregon is really, really good. Kept hearing they have a bunch of new pieces too. Well they are apparently already in sync. Absolutely drilling a much better FCS team than we played. 38-3 at half.
Not to mention that Montana State is ranked #2 in FCS. I’m getting shades of 2014 when we went against the #1 defending FSU team where we playing Arlington.

It was supposed to be a bloodbath but we played well and lost by 6. If J.W didn’t throw that late pick in the red zone..
 
Finally had a chance to watch the game. Shout out to Big Dave who posts the games on YouTube. Here are my unsolicited thoughts. WARNING: many words ahead.

1) Might as well start with the QBs.
Hejny: A lot of praise is being given to Hejny, and he certainly showed his tool set. He showcased his ability to threaten the defense with his legs and throw on the run/off platform. He looked comfortable in the offense and, quite frankly, his mobility really helped cover up the weakness that was our offensive line. Unfortunately, we didn't get to see him operate outside of the early script. That's what I'm most curious about. Also, I've spoken about his throwing motion on here before and I gotta say, it's still a glaring point of concern. He has a hard time putting touch on the ball as a result of the lower release point. It also forces him to change throwing lanes instead of feeling comfortable enough to attempt to layer passes between defenders. Specifically, on his second drive, there was a pass to Abshire that would've been a pick against a better team because he had to throw around a defender rather than going over the top. That said, he clearly feel comfortable in Meach's system. He was making the right reads in the RPO game, he knew where to go with the ball, and he was fearless in both the run and pass game. He can be one of the all-time greats here, especially if he can clean up his throwing motion. He has the intangibles you want in a QB- attitude, mindset, the "it" factor.
Flores: Well, that was an up and down performance. People seemed pretty low on the kid, but it seems like people are starting to come around on him. I'm going to start by saying this; remember, this was the first meaningful snaps either QB has ever had at this level. Our gameplan was always going to be easier for Hejny to execute than it was going to be for Flores. We kept it very basic- RPOs and quick reads. Flores' skillset is going to be showcased as the pass game gets more and more intricate and as the game starts to slow down for him. He also didn't get the benefit of a scripted set of series to start the game. All that to say, it's tough to compare what he did to what Hejny did. Let's just look at what he offers. He has the most polished throwing motion we've seen since Rudolph. It allows him to make throws that not every QB can make. He looked the best when we let him read the defense pre-snap and took the RPO out of it. He will get better as the game goes on and he settles into the rhythm of the game and can see the patterns in the defense. He can be a great QB here, as well. The way I see it, Flores has a higher ceiling than Hejny, but Hejny, when healthy, will have the higher floor due to his physical abilities.

2) Runningbacks. I've been a Sesi truther since he got here and I'm still fully onboard. I don't understand why he doesn't get more carries. Of all the backs we saw on Thursday, he offers the most explosion. He's got good vision, can find and hit the hole/cut back lane, and has good hands. Hicks was.. an enigma. He had glimpses of promise- good balance and ability to break tackles. He doesn't appear to be just exceptionally fast, but he's a big-bodied back who looked like he had good balance through the hole. He also looked like he could get tackled by a strong breeze at times. His vision also seemed hit and miss. Sometimes he could find the crease and hit it, other times he just ran into a mass of bodies. As a Packers fan, I thought of A.J. Dillon while watching him. Dillon looks like he should be an absolute monster to get to the ground, but he often gets tackled by hits that leave you scratching your head. I had similar thoughts watching Hicks. However, I saw potential there and I'm not going to get too down on his performance based on what I saw from the offensive line. It's hard to do much when the defensive line is 3 yards past the LOS by the time you take the hand-off. I was not impressed by Brock. I'm sure his skill set would be much more on display if our offensive line was playing better, but there was nothing that I saw from him on Thursday that made me think he should be on the field right now.

3) Wide Receivers/TEs. Gavin Freeman is a dude. I love watching him play. He's going to be a vital part of our offense this year. If he was 3" taller, he'd be a legit WR1. Rigby was impressive, as well. He displayed a good ability to track the ball in the air and make adjustments. Terrill Davis is fast and could absolutely become a reliable deep threat. However, I was surprised at how.. inconsistent.. he was at tracking the ball. Flores had a deep pass to him that fell incomplete but I couldn't tell if he slowed down, took the wrong angle, or really what happened. He then followed it up with a 41 yard completion. I think he'll improve as the season progresses, but his ability to track the ball in the air has to be among that improvement. Lofton and Abshire played well, but with Abshire, his biggest impact was actually in his blocking. He had some great perimeter blocks that set up some big plays. On the TE front, Ford looked decent in blocking (had a great seal block that popped a good run from Sesi). Monney had the only catch for TEs, but it was also the only target they got. I think we'll see them get more involved as the season progresses.

4) Offensive line. They didn't play well. I think we all saw that. However, I'm not panicking. Yet. I didn't expect them to play well with 3 new players starting, two of which have only been here for 3 months. I think the talent is there, and if that's the case, then they will improve as they continue to get reps with each other. There's just too much newness. New players, new coach, new system. We also kept the blocking scheme pretty simple. It will be interesting to see how they are playing by the time we suit up to play Baylor. If they haven't improved through the OOC schedule, we will be in trouble. Getting Hejny back and keeping him healthy will be an absolute necessity if we want to be competitive in conference.

5) Defensive line. What can I say beyond "wow". They played really, really well. Of course, I'm including Wendell Gregory here even though he's technically listed as a LB. In Grantham's scheme, Gregory will largely play on the line, just without a hand in the dirt most of the time. Gregory was a monster, and mark my words, he will play in the NFL. Beyond Gregory though, the line was able to hold their own with a 3 man front. They were able to generate pressure, set the edge, and plug running lanes. Did they play mistake free? No. That said, their main job is to disrupt the play and allow the 2nd and 3rd level guys to make plays. They did that.

6) Linebackers. Again, pretty impressive. Bryan McCoy and Rawls were always around the ball, even if they weren't the ones making the play. They were flying around the field. They did get lost on some plays, particularly in coverage, but honestly, that's to be expected with a new defensive system. Taje McCoy even showed up on a few plays with big stops/TFLs. I do worry about the depth behind them, though.

7) Secondary. Not bad, not great. The trio of Smiths played well. Robertson got burned in coverage a few times, but did well in run support. This was the weak spot in our defense, but I'm hopeful that they will improve as they get more and more comfortable with the new system. I'm going to rewatch the game again and specifically watch the secondary, but after an initial watch, they played better than I thought they would.

Overall thoughts. The offense was about what I expected, though of course, Hejny's impressive performance was beyond expectations. Hopefully he can get healthy and stay that way. He'll be vital if our offensive line doesn't improve. However, I was impressed by Flores in a lot of ways, too. If the o-line can improve, I think Flores could be a great QB. The game plan didn't do him any favors. Taking the air out of the ball and reducing the number of possessions meant that Flores was robbed of more opportunities to get into the flow of the game. Also, the numbers of series where it was run-run-pass was concerning. The defense performed beyond my expectations for week 1. It's hard to determine much from a game played against an FCS opponent, but it's obvious that the defense will be much better than last year. Next week might be ugly, but no matter the outcome, this team will improve as the season goes along. As it often seems, this team's potential will be governed by the play of the offensive line. We really need them to gel and improve. If they can't, it's going to cripple what this team can otherwise do.
This is a superb write up and honestly the best I have seen after this game, including the guys who get paid to do it.
 
I think if we have sesi vali and Rodney fields at RB then we will see improvement in the running game. Also need howland for some short downs.

The defense will play good. I don’t think we will win but I think it’s closer than most on here think. Maybe 42-20
Key will be using Oregons aggressiveness against them. This is where Meacham has to prove his worth. Need to have some answers such as good screens with some shifts/movements to slow them down.
 
Thoughts from a second watching of the game. Focused primarily on the offensive line, linebackers, and DBs.

Before I start, just some general thoughts. A huge plus from the game - we were nearly perfect in the red zone. Four visits, four scores and three touchdowns. We have struggled converting red zone visits into touchdowns for a long time now. Yeah, two of them were with Hejny, who undeniably gives us an edge in the red zone, but improvement is still improvement. Also, Ford was great in blocking. I really would like to see him get involved in the passing game, too.

Alright, the offensive line. My gut impressions from my first watch were pretty much confirmed after the second. There was a lot of movement with the guys up front. We had guys playing multiple positions and rotating through who was playing each possession. For example, McKinney played RT on some drives, RG on others, and was not on the field on some. We also had some weird alignments, like the LT lining up on the right side outside of the RT and the TE slotting down into the LT position. We did not seem to get much push up front in the run game, though that was probably a side effect of us running a lot of zone blocking schemes. Speaking of, the line seemed to execute better playing gap schemes than zone. Finally, we just seemed to have guys get lost from time to time, seemingly unsure of who was their responsibility and who was going to be picked up by the RB or TE. I think this gets better as the season progresses. We'll see. I maintain that they will be the deciding factor for how good we'll be on offense. After the line, it's the WRs. Individually:

Shick: He jumps off the screen, but for all the wrong reasons. He was not great at LG, and that's being generous. He missed blocks, got beat, and routinely couldn't find his man when the defensive line ran any sort of twist or stunt. For example, on the first drive, he pulls to lead block for Hejny. There's three guys out front of Shick and he manages to block none of them. He tried to pick up the LB, but he completely whiffed and the LB gets the stop on Hejny. A few plays later, he pinches down to double team the NT, but in doing so, allows the LB to blitz untouched. Fortunately, Hejny was athletic enough to roll outside and run it in for the first touchdown.

Kawecki: He played okay at RG. One of our few starters who were here last year. He had to move to C when Carpenter got rolled up on, which highlights his versatility. He was probably more at home at C, but I think we're looking for guards. He was good on the move. He found his blocks and stuck to them. However, he got beat on the play where Hejny supposedly got hurt. It was his guy who got to Hejny.

Carpenter: He also played well. He seemed much more comfortable in pass pro than in run blocking, but he played solidly. Had some mistakes at times, but I can see why we wanted to grab him from Tulsa. Hopefully he isn't too badly hurt.

McKinney: He held his own when he was out on the field. As mentioned before, he played multiple spots on the right side of the line. He seemed to look more at home when he was at RT, however. He is another one who looked better in pass protection than in run blocking, but he was decent all the way around.

Mafi: He also played RT and looked good doing it. I think guard is where we're weak right now, which is why we're rotating through guys playing at RG. Mafi was good in pass protection and was also surprisingly solid in run blocking. He wasn't in on every drive, however.

Samuel: Samuel was.. okay.. at LT. He seemed more comfortable in run blocking than in pass protection, but he did have some good blocks. Particularly, on the 2nd long catch by Terrill Davis, UTM ran a stunt and he recognized what was happening, found his guy on the delay, and blocked him up. He is susceptible to getting beat by DEs who play with heavy hands, though. It's concerning that UTM DEs were able to chop down on him and beat him.

Moving to the linebackers. Again, my gut impression was largely confirmed through the second watch through. I thought they were athletic and were flying around. I do worry about depth behind Brian McCoy and Brandon Rawls, though. There are a few things that I need to correct from my first post, though.

Brian McCoy: Good Lord, this guy plays aggressive. It cost him a few times in coverage, which is what led up to the horse collar tackle on the first drive. However, he got better as the game went along and was all over the field. He could be really good this year. He also appears to be our main communicator out there, calling out assignments and directing the safeties and LBs. I get Shaun Lewis vibes when watching him play, and no, that won't be my last throwback reference with linebackers.

Brandon Rawls: He was better in coverage than I initially thought. On the play where we collected our second horse collar tackle penalty, UTM actually ran the same play that McCoy got lost on and ended up having to horse collar tackle the RB the drive before. The difference was Rawls read the play and blanketed the RB. Unfortunately, the resulting sack was also a horse collar tackle. This is a smart guy. He reminds me of Patrick Lavine, athletic but not overly aggressive.

Taje McCoy: This is were I have to make a correction from my first post. In a second watch through, he did not play as well as I initially thought. He was certainly around the ball, but often that was a result of his motor not stopping and covering up the fact that he was out of position. That said, he has a relentless motor and hopefully, he'll get more comfortable in the defensive scheme.

Lastly, the secondary. I'm not going to go too much into various players and instead, I'll focus more on just general thoughts. However, one player deserves a shoutout from this game. Kenneth Harris played lights out. He lined up in the Nickel mostly, but also on the outside from time to time. He was all over the field. He played well in run support, he was great on delayed blites. He had great timing. He's good at dissecting the play and making the read. He's not afraid to tackle. While I would like to see him wrap up, he absolutely laid the wood to one poor UTM receiver. He played really well.

The UTM scoring drive and the trick play. Initially, I thought this was largely on Robertson, who did get sucked forward by the look of a wide receiver screen. However, I'm actually not all that mad at what he did. Yeah, I would like to see him dissect the play a little bit faster, but I don't know what he saw from his angle, either. It's easy to critique when viewing the play from the TV camera angle, allowing full vision of a play. It was Dylan Smith who was supposed to be in coverage on the WR and who got beat. Smith took a poor angle and wasn't fast enough to recover. It's a bad breakdown, but honestly, it was one of the few glaring errors that our secondary made.

On the whole, the outside CBs played well. All the Smiths played well. JK Johnson also did well in coverage. I don't know if this is a reflection of the talent we have out there or the lack of talent in the UTM WR group, but the UTM receivers did not have a ton of breathing room all night. JK Johnson looked a bit gun shy to tackle. I don't know if that's just rust or if he just doesn't like to tackle. He did have a clutch tackle on the UTM QB, stopping him 2 yards short when otherwise, it was easily a first down. Even on that one, though, he seemed hesitant.

Really, I was most worried about the LBs and the secondary and both groups played really well. It is an FCS opponent, so I'll continue to take it with a grain of salt, but I was impressed by both groups.
 
Thoughts from a second watching of the game. Focused primarily on the offensive line, linebackers, and DBs.

Before I start, just some general thoughts. A huge plus from the game - we were nearly perfect in the red zone. Four visits, four scores and three touchdowns. We have struggled converting red zone visits into touchdowns for a long time now. Yeah, two of them were with Hejny, who undeniably gives us an edge in the red zone, but improvement is still improvement. Also, Ford was great in blocking. I really would like to see him get involved in the passing game, too.

Alright, the offensive line. My gut impressions from my first watch were pretty much confirmed after the second. There was a lot of movement with the guys up front. We had guys playing multiple positions and rotating through who was playing each possession. For example, McKinney played RT on some drives, RG on others, and was not on the field on some. We also had some weird alignments, like the LT lining up on the right side outside of the RT and the TE slotting down into the LT position. We did not seem to get much push up front in the run game, though that was probably a side effect of us running a lot of zone blocking schemes. Speaking of, the line seemed to execute better playing gap schemes than zone. Finally, we just seemed to have guys get lost from time to time, seemingly unsure of who was their responsibility and who was going to be picked up by the RB or TE. I think this gets better as the season progresses. We'll see. I maintain that they will be the deciding factor for how good we'll be on offense. After the line, it's the WRs. Individually:

Shick: He jumps off the screen, but for all the wrong reasons. He was not great at LG, and that's being generous. He missed blocks, got beat, and routinely couldn't find his man when the defensive line ran any sort of twist or stunt. For example, on the first drive, he pulls to lead block for Hejny. There's three guys out front of Shick and he manages to block none of them. He tried to pick up the LB, but he completely whiffed and the LB gets the stop on Hejny. A few plays later, he pinches down to double team the NT, but in doing so, allows the LB to blitz untouched. Fortunately, Hejny was athletic enough to roll outside and run it in for the first touchdown.

Kawecki: He played okay at RG. One of our few starters who were here last year. He had to move to C when Carpenter got rolled up on, which highlights his versatility. He was probably more at home at C, but I think we're looking for guards. He was good on the move. He found his blocks and stuck to them. However, he got beat on the play where Hejny supposedly got hurt. It was his guy who got to Hejny.

Carpenter: He also played well. He seemed much more comfortable in pass pro than in run blocking, but he played solidly. Had some mistakes at times, but I can see why we wanted to grab him from Tulsa. Hopefully he isn't too badly hurt.

McKinney: He held his own when he was out on the field. As mentioned before, he played multiple spots on the right side of the line. He seemed to look more at home when he was at RT, however. He is another one who looked better in pass protection than in run blocking, but he was decent all the way around.

Mafi: He also played RT and looked good doing it. I think guard is where we're weak right now, which is why we're rotating through guys playing at RG. Mafi was good in pass protection and was also surprisingly solid in run blocking. He wasn't in on every drive, however.

Samuel: Samuel was.. okay.. at LT. He seemed more comfortable in run blocking than in pass protection, but he did have some good blocks. Particularly, on the 2nd long catch by Terrill Davis, UTM ran a stunt and he recognized what was happening, found his guy on the delay, and blocked him up. He is susceptible to getting beat by DEs who play with heavy hands, though. It's concerning that UTM DEs were able to chop down on him and beat him.

Moving to the linebackers. Again, my gut impression was largely confirmed through the second watch through. I thought they were athletic and were flying around. I do worry about depth behind Brian McCoy and Brandon Rawls, though. There are a few things that I need to correct from my first post, though.

Brian McCoy: Good Lord, this guy plays aggressive. It cost him a few times in coverage, which is what led up to the horse collar tackle on the first drive. However, he got better as the game went along and was all over the field. He could be really good this year. He also appears to be our main communicator out there, calling out assignments and directing the safeties and LBs. I get Shaun Lewis vibes when watching him play, and no, that won't be my last throwback reference with linebackers.

Brandon Rawls: He was better in coverage than I initially thought. On the play where we collected our second horse collar tackle penalty, UTM actually ran the same play that McCoy got lost on and ended up having to horse collar tackle the RB the drive before. The difference was Rawls read the play and blanketed the RB. Unfortunately, the resulting sack was also a horse collar tackle. This is a smart guy. He reminds me of Patrick Lavine, athletic but not overly aggressive.

Taje McCoy: This is were I have to make a correction from my first post. In a second watch through, he did not play as well as I initially thought. He was certainly around the ball, but often that was a result of his motor not stopping and covering up the fact that he was out of position. That said, he has a relentless motor and hopefully, he'll get more comfortable in the defensive scheme.

Lastly, the secondary. I'm not going to go too much into various players and instead, I'll focus more on just general thoughts. However, one player deserves a shoutout from this game. Kenneth Harris played lights out. He lined up in the Nickel mostly, but also on the outside from time to time. He was all over the field. He played well in run support, he was great on delayed blites. He had great timing. He's good at dissecting the play and making the read. He's not afraid to tackle. While I would like to see him wrap up, he absolutely laid the wood to one poor UTM receiver. He played really well.

The UTM scoring drive and the trick play. Initially, I thought this was largely on Robertson, who did get sucked forward by the look of a wide receiver screen. However, I'm actually not all that mad at what he did. Yeah, I would like to see him dissect the play a little bit faster, but I don't know what he saw from his angle, either. It's easy to critique when viewing the play from the TV camera angle, allowing full vision of a play. It was Dylan Smith who was supposed to be in coverage on the WR and who got beat. Smith took a poor angle and wasn't fast enough to recover. It's a bad breakdown, but honestly, it was one of the few glaring errors that our secondary made.

On the whole, the outside CBs played well. All the Smiths played well. JK Johnson also did well in coverage. I don't know if this is a reflection of the talent we have out there or the lack of talent in the UTM WR group, but the UTM receivers did not have a ton of breathing room all night. JK Johnson looked a bit gun shy to tackle. I don't know if that's just rust or if he just doesn't like to tackle. He did have a clutch tackle on the UTM QB, stopping him 2 yards short when otherwise, it was easily a first down. Even on that one, though, he seemed hesitant.

Really, I was most worried about the LBs and the secondary and both groups played really well. It is an FCS opponent, so I'll continue to take it with a grain of salt, but I was impressed by both groups.
What stood out to me both live and watching the upload on the defensive side that we are light years ahead of last year.

1) We didn’t seem to miss many tackles. And on runs we had more than just one player meeting the ball carrier in many occasions.
2) LBs/Safties seemed to be in position on runs.
3) Aside from the trick play there weren’t many UTM guys just running free past the sticks on pass plays.
4) DL seems to actually be able to make plays.

This may not be a top 25 defense or maybe even top 50 but if we are somewhere between 40th and 60th we will win games and be competitive.

Offensively, I miss the days when we actually ran routes and threw the ball inside the hashes. At this point I’d settle for inside the numbers. It’s either verticals w an occasional deep cross that is thrown outside the numbers or sideways w a wr block.
 
What stood out to me both live and watching the upload on the defensive side that we are light years ahead of last year.

1) We didn’t seem to miss many tackles. And on runs we had more than just one player meeting the ball carrier in many occasions.
2) LBs/Safties seemed to be in position on runs.
3) Aside from the trick play there weren’t many UTM guys just running free past the sticks on pass plays.
4) DL seems to actually be able to make plays.

This may not be a top 25 defense or maybe even top 50 but if we are somewhere between 40th and 60th we will win games and be competitive.

Offensively, I miss the days when we actually ran routes and threw the ball inside the hashes. At this point I’d settle for inside the numbers. It’s either verticals w an occasional deep cross that is thrown outside the numbers or sideways w a wr block.
Agree. The defense is night and day already. We’re lined up right, our guys are in the right gaps and tackle in space.

Regarding the offense, I was really expecting to see this in the Meacham offense. I’m hoping we see some of it against Oregon. We have to be able to attack within the hashes.
 
Back
Top