Trump 2024 Run Thread

Trump Thread- nothing but left throwing dirt.
Harris Thread- mostly left singing praises, couple of right articles then left vehemently defending them with whataboutisms.

Facebook politics is more educational and interesting than this. I'm out. Back to A.V. only for me.
I might sneak a peek in November though. 😉

Ice Cube Friday GIF
 
Trump Thread- nothing but left throwing dirt.
Harris Thread- mostly left singing praises, couple of right articles then left vehemently defending them with whataboutisms.

Facebook politics is more educational and interesting than this. I'm out. Back to A.V. only for me.
I might sneak a peek in November though. 😉
200w (1).gif
 
Trump Thread- nothing but left throwing dirt.
Harris Thread- mostly left singing praises, couple of right articles then left vehemently defending them with whataboutisms.

Facebook politics is more educational and interesting than this. I'm out. Back to A.V. only for me.
I might sneak a peek in November though. 😉
This is not an airport.

No need to announce your departure, friend.
 
Trump Thread- nothing but left throwing dirt.
Harris Thread- mostly left singing praises, couple of right articles then left vehemently defending them with whataboutisms.

Facebook politics is more educational and interesting than this. I'm out. Back to A.V. only for me.
I might sneak a peek in November though. 😉

None of the Trump supporters are in the Trump thread defending Trump against the "dirt" being thrown. Therefore since it is all dirt it is not educational or interesting so a Trump supporter is going to leave.

Ok, got it.
 

trump is struggling...too old?!...

confusing Harris with Haley...forgot the word 'abortion' (needed a lifeline 'ask the audience')...and of course a shout out to his ole friend Hannibal Lecter...

He's clearly in cognitive decline. It's sad how his handlers treat an old man. It's time for him to step aside and let someone younger run.
 
Trump hush money prosecutors say conviction should stand despite immunity ruling reuters

NEW YORK, July 25 (Reuters) - The Manhattan prosecutors who secured Donald Trump's historic criminal conviction disputed the former U.S. president's claim that the verdict should be set aside in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.
In a court filing dated July 24 and made public on Thursday, the prosecutors said the Supreme Court's ruling had no bearing on their case, which stemmed from hush money paid to a porn star.

"All of the evidence that he complains of either concerned wholly unofficial conduct, or, at most, official conduct for which any presumption of immunity has been rebutted," prosecutors with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office wrote.
Trump, the Republican nominee in the Nov. 5 election, opens new tab, was convicted on May 30 on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to cover up his former lawyer Michael Cohen's $130,000 payment to porn star Stormy Daniels for her silence before the 2016 election about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump.

Trump denies any encounter with Daniels and has vowed to appeal the guilty verdict. He is the first U.S. president past or present to be convicted of a crime.
In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court on July 1 ruled that presidents cannot face criminal charges over official acts, and that evidence of official acts cannot be used in a prosecution on private matters.
Legal experts say Justice Juan Merchan is unlikely to grant Trump's request to toss the verdict, since much of the conduct at issue predated Trump's 2017-2021 presidency and relates to personal matters, not official acts.

But Merchan delayed Trump's sentencing from July 11 to Sept. 18, less than two months before the election, to allow his lawyers the chance to make their case.
Two weeks ago, Trump's defense lawyers urged the judge to toss the jury's guilty verdict because prosecutors relied on evidence of his official acts during the trial, which they said was improper in light of the justices' ruling.
Trump's lawyers took issue with introduction of evidence of Twitter posts Trump made in 2018 about Cohen, which prosecutors said showed Trump was aware that his former lawyer had paid off Daniels. Defense lawyers said those posts were official communications.
 
I think I his kinda creepy ..I don't have girls..is It normal for a dad to refer to their 17 yr old daughter this way??

Dad's with daughters chime in .I'm genuinely curious if this is normal or not

Donald Trump Jr. Calls His 17 yr old Daughter "Sexy"

Kai, what do you think?" Trump Jr. asks his daughter. "Gettin' makeup. Make me look sexy like you."

 
He legit said " we have lawyers at every poll booth"

Trump on Fox & Friends claims that he's instructed his supporters not to vote: "My instruction -- we don't need the votes. I have so many votes."

 
I think I his kinda creepy ..I don't have girls..is It normal for a dad to refer to their 17 yr old daughter this way??

Dad's with daughters chime in .I'm genuinely curious if this is normal or not

Donald Trump Jr. Calls His 17 yr old Daughter "Sexy"

Kai, what do you think?" Trump Jr. asks his daughter. "Gettin' makeup. Make me look sexy like you."

F@$* no it’s not normal. Furthermore there’s nothing normal about any of the Trumps.
 
I think I his kinda creepy ..I don't have girls..is It normal for a dad to refer to their 17 yr old daughter this way??

Dad's with daughters chime in .I'm genuinely curious if this is normal or not

Donald Trump Jr. Calls His 17 yr old Daughter "Sexy"

Kai, what do you think?" Trump Jr. asks his daughter. "Gettin' makeup. Make me look sexy like you."

no.gif
 
word of the day: ironic

trump's nickname for Harris: lyin' kamala
View attachment 6011
Honestly, just another thing to show how he is losing his touch. While most of his nicknames were crude and unprofessional, they were at least funny in a high school sense.
That nickname is boring, unoriginal, and she lies like every other politician. Not anywhere near the level that he does.
 
Last edited:

Senator Tammy Duckworth eviscerates Trump for painful comments about disabled Americans


Democrats commemorated the 34th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act by coming out swinging against Donald Trump, after his nephew claimed in a new memoir that the former president once suggested people with disabilities “should just die.”

“It’s hard to describe the pain millions of Americans with disabilities are feeling in response to Donald Trump’s newly-reported comments against folks with disabilities,” Senator Tammy Duckworth, who lost both of her legs serving in the Iraq War, said in a statement shared by the Democratic National Committee on Friday.


“But we know this is nothing new for him — he mocked a reporter with a physical disability, dismissed traumatic brain injuries as ‘not very serious,’ attempted to slash support for disabled veterans and so much more. Any human being who suggests that people with disabilities ‘should just die’ is fundamentally unfit to serve.”

Duckworth’s slam comes after the former president’s nephew, Fred Trump III, revealed shocking details from a private conversation the pair had following a meeting about patients with disabilities and their families at the White House at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic.

“Those people... The shape they’re in, all the expenses, maybe those kinds of people should just die,” Trump allegedly said in the Oval Office, according to Fred Trump III’s memoir, All in the Family: The Trumps and How We Got This Way.

Democrats also sought to tie Trump’s words about disability to Project 2025, the conservative Heritage Foundation’s blueprint for a potential second Trump administration. Trump has sought to distance himself from the program, despite the fact many former administration officials helped write it.


Sen Tammy Duckworth arrives for a briefing on Ukraine at the US Capitol on 20 September 2023 (Getty Images)


Friday marks 34 years since former President George H W Bush, a Republican, signed the Americans with Disabilities Act into law, thanks to bipartisan collaboration in Congress.

In recent years, there has been less agreeement between parties on disability rights. The DNC’s release points out that Trump faced multiple lawsuits during his presidency claiming that his properties did not comply with the ADA and also notes his attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, which would have reduced funding for Medicaid, which many people with disabilities rely on to receive care in their homes.



The Republican National Committee’s “research” account on X has also taken heat for mocking Vice President Kamala Harris in 2022 for describing what she was wearing, a common practice to aid people who are blind or who have low-vision. The Republican National Committee did not release a statement commemorating the law.

Democrats also noted how Project 2025 proposes eliminating the Department of Education, which enforces accommodations for students with disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Despite the eroding bipartisan consensus, a few areas of agreement remain on the issue. Numerous states with Republican governors have outlawed the practice of paying people with disabilities below the minimum wage, as have many Democratic governors.

Similarly, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, a recent candidate for the Republican nomination for president, recently signed legislation to allow for supported decision-making as an alternative to guardianship to allow for people with disabilities to still have control of their finances. Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom of California signed similar legislation.



Harris for her part was the first Democratic presidential candidate in the 2020 contest to release a disability policy.

“On the 34th anniversary of the ADA, we’re reminded how far we’ve come but how much work still remains, and we won’t go backward,” Duckworth sad. “The disability community cannot withstand another four years of Trump.”

The Independent is the world’s most free-thinking news brand, providing global news, commentary and analysis for the independently-minded. We have grown a huge, global readership of independently minded individuals, who value our trusted voice and commitment to positive change. Our mission, making change happen, has never been as important as it is today.
 
J D's rhetoric towards those without children growing in Trump's surrogates

Trump campaign partner Charlie Kirk says “the childless are the ones that are destroying the country.” He says “if you’re bad, you probably don’t have children.”

 
Back
Top