That's a wild statement unless you know him personally.My guess is the latter. There is nothing in his character that would indicate otherwise. Most of his past actions indicate the opposite, actually.
That's a wild statement unless you know him personally.My guess is the latter. There is nothing in his character that would indicate otherwise. Most of his past actions indicate the opposite, actually.
I'm not a lawyer and I haven't read Gundy's contract, but I would assume there is some boilerplate language about causing financial harm and embarrassment to the university. It could be argued (not saying they would win) that his comments about loser fans caused embarrassment and financial harm.What would be the "cause"? His comments about loser fans? Is that really a $10 million comment?
There have been a lot of “wild statement unless you know him…..” posts the last two weeks.That's a wild statement unless you know him personally.
How do you know they are wild? Do you know these people personally?There have been a lot of “wild statement unless you know him…..” posts the last two weeks.
Gundy, the BoR, potential coaching hires, coaches that allegedly changed their minds, Shrum, Weiberg, etc…..
How is it we know minds were changed?There have been a lot of “wild statement unless you know him…..” posts the last two weeks.
Gundy, the BoR, potential coaching hires, coaches that allegedly changed their minds, Shrum, Weiberg, etc…..
How is it we know minds were changed?
Lol, okay keyboard warrior.How do we know that the BOR only stepped in because they saw Gundys methods as a problem and not because some members had an axe to grind with him?
Get behind our program or GTFO.
Lol, okay keyboard warrior.
It’s a pretty simple question.
Ask @007Poke the same questions.No one knows if you aren't a squat troll. Are you?
That's a pretty simple question as well.
Are you twelve, or just incapable of hearing any other point of view, or both?No one knows if you aren't a squat troll. Are you?
That's a pretty simple question as well.
Ask @007Poke the same questions.
I was able to pay my bills this month, and guess what, I feel like a 3-9 season really isn't too bad.He might be as well. I don't have much use for people who are trashing the program at this point.
Maybe some those guys really can't pay their bills and took stuff way too personally.
So is 2 big 12 championship appearances in the last 4 years.I was able to pay my bills this month, and guess what, I feel like a 3-9 season really isn't too bad.
Also, the three-quarterback system is very underrated.
I was able to pay my bills this month, and guess what, I feel like a 3-9 season really isn't too bad.
Also, the three-quarterback system is very underrated.
I’m younger than that. I’ve witnessed the end of Les and all Mike. I’m still with him. What he does off the field is just as important as on, in regards to how our program looks, how clean it is, etc. It’s often very overlooked.How old are you?
Not knocking your age, but I wonder if you were around in the before times.
In my 4 years, I had 3 of them with Simmons and 1 with Les. No bowl games and we had to get a tetanus shot when entering the stadium. Bedlam in 2000 was more red than orange.
Some people now say the bowl streak was overrated. It's easy to say when you barely remember when just making one was a really big deal. The change in our culture happened for many reasons but a really really big one was the current HC. I think alot of people forget that.
No. He was refusing meetings with Weiberg and then later Weiberg & Shrum together. He hadn’t made any contract concessions or communicated any plans for staff changes.I thought he had essentially agreed to take the pay cut for NIL purposes before the meeting was even scheduled.
I don’t think it was that.What would be the "cause"? His comments about loser fans? Is that really a $10 million comment?
The spin on this is hard to fathom. People actually thinking Gundy is responsible for all these changes and re-structuring his contract. It's beyond hilarious.No. He was refusing meetings with Weiberg and then later Weiberg & Shrum together. He hadn’t made any contract concessions or communicated any plans for staff changes.
I don’t think it was that.
Ask @007Poke the same questions.