Mitt Romney the king of talking out of both sides of his mouth.Mitt Romney's take:
Mitt Romney the king of talking out of both sides of his mouth.Mitt Romney's take:
Did Trump ask or try to settle? That would require admitting guilt in a way. There's no way Trump would ever admit he did something wrong...Mitt Romney's take:
Cultists are gonna cult, so….they don’t at all.Do any of you Trump supporters ever take a long, hard, objective look at him and think..."man, THIS is the guy I'm laying it all on the line for. This orange buffoon" ? And then freak out a little bit?
It takes two to reach a plea agreement. Trumps ego would never let him do that.Mitt Romney's take:
My point is simple. If you’re ok with the trial and verdict handed down on Trump this week because he broke the law (maybe he did )and was convicted by a jury of his peers (he was) and NO ONE is above the law after all (they shouldn’t be ….right?) Then why in the heck would you have a problem when the other side continues to go down the same path? We all know the answer….because next time it is going to be a Democrat. I’ve been saying it since all of this started and now the chickens are coming home to roost. My prediction was, and still is, the Dems are going to wish they hadn’t gone down this path. The truth, in this particular case, is that it will be overturned on appeal…..after the Dems are able to campaign on the verdict up to the election. What pisses me off the most is when they look right into the camera and boldly state that it wasn’t political . Of course it was. And it will be political when the worm turns and the GOP does the same damn thing. If you want to strut around about how this is all going down then power to you….just have some dignity and don’t start the sky screaming and pearl clutching when someone points out that two can play this game. It’s a bad look.
Menedez just accepted bribes. All of them get rich. They are just persecuting him. It isn't like Bob is doing anything that the rest of them don't do...... yada, yada, yada.IDK. It's not like anyone here is rushing to the defense of Bob Menendez. Pretty much the general consensus has been if someone commits a crime and is found guilty then cool.
Yeah, I probably could have worded that better.Sort of seemed that way:
It’s not.Why is it wrong to prosecute criminals?
Then why was it wrong to prosecute Trump?It’s not.
Prosecute and jail if found guilty...IDK. It's not like anyone here is rushing to the defense of Bob Menendez. Pretty much the general consensus has been if someone commits a crime and is found guilty then cool.
This is the post I responded to:Then why was it wrong to prosecute Trump?
If they want to investigate crimes then I have no issues, just apply equally regardless of party. Same for Blue State AGs and DAs.This is the post I responded to:
View attachment 5014
Polds posted it and I simply posted that nobody should have a problem with this in any way whatsoever if they agree with the way Trump is being handled. Jimmies were rustled, panties were wadded, and pearls were clutched. Per usual.
Yeah, I probably could have worded that better.
It’s not.
Then why was it wrong to prosecute Trump?
Right?Rational people: Trump committed a crime. It’s good he was convicted. The system worked. We look forward to criminals being prosecuted and convicted whatever their power, politics or position.
100 percent.So you can both co-sign on this statement….right?
Right?