Cowboy4life9688
Ranger
Agree no question but doesn’t mean he absolve of criticism. Yes he’s taken the football to new heights…but at the same time 2011 was the programs peak just like 2016 seems to be the peak of baseball. Notre Dame is a nice win but let’s not act he beat a vintage notre dame squad in an era where players opt out of bowl games. Football has top 10 facilities over the years.During Gundy's tenure we have reached new highs in football. He established strong winning tradition from a team that was historically average. He beat Texas often and more recently Notre Dame, etc. It is more difficult for a school with limited resources and tradition to achieve what Gundy has. I think many here feel that OSU has a national reputation in baseball and a notable winning history and a brand-new stadium. I bet the consensus is that Holiday is underachieving. It is even more clear that Boynton is underachieving. It benefits all students and alumni to be excited and supportive of their sports programs and for the administration to not get too passive with expectations. There is potential to do better and there are things an AD can do short of firing the head coach.
Point I’m trying to make it both deserve their share of criticism. At the end of the day, it’s about fan expectations. If you expect Omaha trips yearly, Holliday is underachieving, If you expect March madness trips annually , boynton is underachieving. I would say both have been. If you’re happy with winning seasons and having a bowl streak, gundy is right on track. Some fans might not be happy with one conference title in 18 years. Some fans might not be happy and that’s okay.