Trump 2024 Run Thread

Black Trump supporter claims he was called a ‘slave’ by right-wing organization he was canvassing for​


Adie-hard Trumper in Florida says he was discriminated against by a right-wing political advocacy group, claiming he was called a “slave” during his 12 days with the organization before it fired him for complaining.

Carl Baxter, who is Black, is suing Americans for Prosperity, the nonprofit “grassroots” conservative operation run by Charles and David Koch, the billionaire siblings and hard-line climate change deniers.


Baxter serves as president of the Republican Club of North & East Fort Myers, and is not at all shy about his outsized affection for Donald Trump. He can be seen on social media at Trump appearances, waving a MAGA flag at a “Trump Truck Parade,” at charity galas giving the camera a Trumpian “thumbs-up,” and donning a red MAGA hat and posing with, among others, a county tax collector who has come out as a vociferous opponent of critical race theory.

AFP, which has been around since 2004, gained prominence after Barack Obama was sworn in as president. It has traditionally focused on hollowing out workers’ rights, blocking Medicaid expansion, kneecapping green energy initiatives, and pushing down the minimum wage. Since 2010, some 42 percent of AFP’s ads have been rated “false” by PolitiFact, the nonpartisan fact-checking website; none have been rated “true.” The group backed Trump’s UN ambassador Nikki Haley in the 2024 presidential race before the former South Carolina governor bowed out in March.


Trump chafed at AFP’s support of Haley, posting last January to his flailing Twitter clone, Truth Social: “American’s [sic] for No Prosperity, who made more money during the Trump years than at any other time, are stupid people who are backing Birdbrain as she goes down tubes. Bad timing Charles!”


Baxter’s lawsuit, which was filed Monday and obtained by The Independent, describes him as “an African-American businessman who is active in local politics.” It says he was brought on by AFP in June 2023 to work as a part-time “grassroots associate.” Baxter’s duties “consisted of canvassing neighborhoods to talk with voters about AFP-selected policy issues and driving to and from those neighborhoods,” according to the suit.



AFP agreed to pay Baxter $20 an hour for the door-knocking duties, plus an unspecified mileage reimbursement, the lawsuit states. He started on June 14, 2023, and his job performance, according to the suit, “was exemplary.”

However, the lawsuit says Baxter quickly became disenchanted with AFP.

“Early in Plaintiff’s tenure, AFP’s Deputy Director [of] Grassroots… met Plaintiff at the Oasis restaurant in downtown Ft. Myers and offered Plaintiff $500 in bribe money to provide ‘dirt’ on Cape Coral councilmember, Patty Cummings,” the suit alleges. “Plaintiff declined. AFP’s goal was to stop President Donald J. Trump from winning the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential primaries and, locally, to oppose politicians who support President Trump.”

Baxter also felt AFP was not giving him “credit for all the hours he worked and for all the doors that he knocked on,” and shorting him on his pay, the lawsuit contends. So, 12 days into the job, the suit says he raised his concerns on a phone call with his supervisor, AFP Grassroots Engagement Director Roxanne Buckels.


Buckels, who is white, according to Baxter’s suit, “then proceeded to call [him] a ‘slave’ and demanded that he confirm he is a ‘slave,’ stating as follows: ‘I know you are doing the work and I can see the doors that you are hitting on my iPad on my side. At least you are working as a slave (sarcastically) but at least you are getting paid, many slaves today do get paid, many used to never get paid. Are you a slave?’”


Baxter was “highly offended,” and “demanded to speak with Ms. Buckels’ immediate supervisor,” the lawsuit goes on. Buckels then arranged a conference call with her boss, who is also white, according to the suit, to discuss Baxter’s concerns. A few minutes later, the supervisor called back, with AFP’s state operations director on the line — a white woman, the lawsuit says — and “terminated Plaintiff’s employment without notice, effective immediately.”

The lawsuit says Baxter still has not received the wages AFP owes him, nor has he been paid back for any of his mileage. By the same token, Baxter claims in his suit that AFP paid its white employees without issue. The suit accuses AFP of race discrimination, retaliation, and wage theft, and demands back pay and legal fees, as well as exemplary, punitive, and compensatory damages “for Plaintiff’s emotional pain and suffering.”


An AFP spokesperson told The Independent, “While we do not comment on current litigation, we take all allegations of violations of the law extremely seriously and will fully investigate those made in this complaint.”

Baxter’s attorney, Jay Lechter, told The Independent, “My client simply wants justice and to ensure that this does not happen to anyone else.”

A source with direct knowledge of the situation noted that Baxter was technically working for AFP as a contractor, and said AFP was not in fact his direct employer.

Buckels did not respond to a request for comment.
 

RFK Jr. vows to stop chemtrails after watching video pushing conspiracy​


"I fall for misinformation on the Internet all the time."
- actual RFK Jr quote

Kennedy Should Be in an Insane Asylum:
 
Why is anyone surprised Tulsi endorsed Trump?? They act like she's some left leaning Democrat that switched sides to Trump. Do they just have terrible memory? She was hardly a Democrat when she was running for the Dem ticket. This shouldn't be surprising to anyone...

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
 
Why is anyone surprised Tulsi endorsed Trump?? They act like she's some left leaning Democrat that switched sides to Trump. Do they just have terrible memory? She was hardly a Democrat when she was running for the Dem ticket. This shouldn't be surprising to anyone...

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
Mitt Romney tried to warn everyone 2.5 YEARS ago

1724790031504.png
 

Trump economic agenda would increase deficit by more than $4 trillion: Analysis​


Former President Donald Trump’s tax and spending proposals would increase the deficit by more than $4 trillion over the next decade, according to a new analysis.

Trump's plans for tax cuts would see revenues fall by $5.8 trillion over the next decade, according to the estimate from the Penn-Wharton Budget Model, a group housed at the University of Pennsylvania’s business school that analyzes the fiscal effects of public policies. Under current law, the government is supposed to take in about $63 trillion in revenues, according to congressional projections.


On a dynamic basis, though, meaning an analysis that takes into consideration the added economic growth from the tax cuts, deficits are forecast to increase by $4.1 trillion.

Among the economic proposals that were modeled is Trump's call to extend expiring individual and business portions of his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, better known as the Trump tax cuts. He also wants to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits and has proposed lowering the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15%.

“Permanently extending the expiring individual income tax provisions of TCJA would add $3.4 trillion to deficits (before interest costs) over the next ten years,” the report says. “Restoring the original TCJA regime for taxing business investment adds another $623 billion to increase the total cost of TCJA extension to more than $4 trillion.”

Trump recently floated the idea of eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits for seniors. Seniors receiving Social Security income pay taxes on 50% of their income from the program, and in some cases, as high as 85% if their combined income from other sources pushes them above a certain threshold.



The budget model found that the additional cost of eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits is $1.2 trillion over the decade and the additional cost of lowering the corporate tax rate to 15% would be $595 billion.

The report found that the Trump economic agenda would increase gross domestic product growth from the baseline over the coming 10 years, although, in 2034, GDP is forecast to fall by 0.4% and would fall by 2.1% in 30 years.

“Low, middle, and high-income households in 2026 and 2034 all fare better under the campaign proposals on a conventional basis,” the report says. “These conventional gains and losses do not include the additional debt burden on future generations who must finance almost the entirety of the tax decreases.”

But not all of Trump's economic agenda was examined by the Penn-Wharton model. The forecast didn’t include the idea of imposing 10% across-the-board tariff on all imports or Trump’s push to not tax tips earned by servers and bartenders. That is because a significant number of additional details about the plans would be needed to sufficiently model their long-run economic footprint.



The economy has been the biggest matter on the campaign trail. Republicans are pushing to win Congress and the White House in order to renew expiring provisions of the Trump tax cuts. A large chunk of middle-class voters would experience tax increases if the 2017 law is allowed to completely expire.

Budget hawks have raised concerns about the policy proposals of both Republicans and Democrats and have warned that further increasing the national debt and deficits could put the United States on a precarious fiscal footing.

Last month, the total national debt hit the milestone of $35 trillion.


Debt held by the public, which is separate from the national debt in that it excludes intragovernmental holdings of federal debt, is predicted to rise from 99% of gross domestic product this year to 122% of GDP by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

The Medicare trust fund is forecast to be exhausted in 2036, and the combined Social Security trust fund will become exhausted in 2035, the program’s trustees projected in May.
 

Trump economic agenda would increase deficit by more than $4 trillion: Analysis​


Former President Donald Trump’s tax and spending proposals would increase the deficit by more than $4 trillion over the next decade, according to a new analysis.

Trump's plans for tax cuts would see revenues fall by $5.8 trillion over the next decade, according to the estimate from the Penn-Wharton Budget Model, a group housed at the University of Pennsylvania’s business school that analyzes the fiscal effects of public policies. Under current law, the government is supposed to take in about $63 trillion in revenues, according to congressional projections.


On a dynamic basis, though, meaning an analysis that takes into consideration the added economic growth from the tax cuts, deficits are forecast to increase by $4.1 trillion.

Among the economic proposals that were modeled is Trump's call to extend expiring individual and business portions of his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, better known as the Trump tax cuts. He also wants to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits and has proposed lowering the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15%.

“Permanently extending the expiring individual income tax provisions of TCJA would add $3.4 trillion to deficits (before interest costs) over the next ten years,” the report says. “Restoring the original TCJA regime for taxing business investment adds another $623 billion to increase the total cost of TCJA extension to more than $4 trillion.”

Trump recently floated the idea of eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits for seniors. Seniors receiving Social Security income pay taxes on 50% of their income from the program, and in some cases, as high as 85% if their combined income from other sources pushes them above a certain threshold.



The budget model found that the additional cost of eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits is $1.2 trillion over the decade and the additional cost of lowering the corporate tax rate to 15% would be $595 billion.

The report found that the Trump economic agenda would increase gross domestic product growth from the baseline over the coming 10 years, although, in 2034, GDP is forecast to fall by 0.4% and would fall by 2.1% in 30 years.

“Low, middle, and high-income households in 2026 and 2034 all fare better under the campaign proposals on a conventional basis,” the report says. “These conventional gains and losses do not include the additional debt burden on future generations who must finance almost the entirety of the tax decreases.”

But not all of Trump's economic agenda was examined by the Penn-Wharton model. The forecast didn’t include the idea of imposing 10% across-the-board tariff on all imports or Trump’s push to not tax tips earned by servers and bartenders. That is because a significant number of additional details about the plans would be needed to sufficiently model their long-run economic footprint.



The economy has been the biggest matter on the campaign trail. Republicans are pushing to win Congress and the White House in order to renew expiring provisions of the Trump tax cuts. A large chunk of middle-class voters would experience tax increases if the 2017 law is allowed to completely expire.

Budget hawks have raised concerns about the policy proposals of both Republicans and Democrats and have warned that further increasing the national debt and deficits could put the United States on a precarious fiscal footing.

Last month, the total national debt hit the milestone of $35 trillion.


Debt held by the public, which is separate from the national debt in that it excludes intragovernmental holdings of federal debt, is predicted to rise from 99% of gross domestic product this year to 122% of GDP by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

The Medicare trust fund is forecast to be exhausted in 2036, and the combined Social Security trust fund will become exhausted in 2035, the program’s trustees projected in May.
Compare Trump's $4 Trillion deficit increase to Harris's $1.7 Trillion.. The Harris/Walz Ticket is BY FAR the MORE CONSERVATIVE (oddly enough both SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY) of the two voting options this term.

Harris' economic plan would add over $1.7T to national debt: CRFB​


Akey part of Vice President Kamala Harris' newly released economic agenda would add $1.7 trillion to America's growing national debt, according to a budget watchdog.

The plan, dubbed an "Agenda to Lower Costs for American Families," was released Friday as Harris lays out her platform in her campaign for president. It includes expansions of the Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit, as well as an extension of the health insurance premium subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare) that are due to expire at the end of next year. It would also establish a new $25,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers, expand tax credits for building affordable housing, create a $40 billion housing innovation fund, and seek to lower prescription drug prices through negotiations and increased transparency.


A rapid analysis by the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) found that these plans would increase federal budget deficits by $1.7 trillion over the next decade. That figure would rise to $2 trillion if temporary housing policies the vice president has proposed are eventually made permanent.


The think tank noted that although the fact sheet released by the Harris campaign "is lacking certain details that would be necessary for a full analysis of these policies, many of them resemble proposals in the Biden-Harris Administration's most recent budget."

Based on CRFB's analysis of what the Harris campaign released, the cost of new tax credits and spending would total about $1.95 trillion over fiscal years 2026 to 2035 – which would rise to $2.25 trillion if the housing policies were made permanent.


That figure would be partially offset by about $250 billion in savings from lower prescription drug costs, resulting in a $1.7 trillion increase to the deficit over that period.

The most expensive component of the plan would be the expansion of the Child Tax Credit (CTC) by making it fully refundable and increasing the base credit from $2,000 to $3,000, or to $3,600 for children under the age of 6.

That would cost a total of $1.1 trillion over 10 years relative to the extension of the CTC and related policies as structured under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, while that figure would rise to $1.8 trillion when compared to current law given that CTC policies are slated to expire.

It would also boost the credit for children in the first year of their lives to $6,000, which would cost a further $100 billion over a decade.


Extending the expansion of the ObamaCare premium tax credit would cost $400 billion over the decade. Increasing the Earned Income Tax Credit for workers without child dependents for tax purposes would cost $150 billion.

The $25,000 first-time homebuyer credit, which is scheduled to be in place for four years based on Harris' plan, would cost $100 billion over a decade based on her campaign's estimate of 4 million eligible homebuyers – though CRFB believes that number could be higher and result in additional costs.


Additional affordable housing policies included in her plan would also be in place for four years and would also cost $100 billion over 10 years, although CRFB notes that cost could differ due to not-yet-specified details of Harris' proposal.

While the proposal released by her campaign didn't specify how they would be funded through higher taxes or spending reductions, Harris and her vice presidential nominee, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, have said they plan to "fulfill their commitment to fiscal responsibility, including by asking the wealthiest Americans and largest corporations to pay their fair share – steps that will allow us to make necessary investments in the middle class, while also reducing the deficit and strengthening our fiscal health."

Harris' announcement on Friday represents just a portion of her overall economic agenda. She has also said that she plans to release plans for education, child care and long-term care, among other policies.
 
Trump campaign staff had altercation with official at Arlington National Cemetery

Two members of Donald Trump's campaign staff had a verbal and physical altercation Monday with an official at Arlington National Cemetery, where the former president participated in a wreath-laying ceremony, NPR has learned.

A source with knowledge of the incident said the cemetery official tried to prevent Trump staffers from filming and photographing in a section where recent U.S. casualties are buried. The source said Arlington officials had made clear that only cemetery staff members are authorized to take photographs or film in the area, known as Section 60.

When the cemetery official tried to prevent Trump campaign staff from entering Section 60, campaign staff verbally abused and pushed the official aside, according to the source.



Trump participated in an event to mark the third anniversary of a deadly attack on U.S. troops in Afghanistan as U.S. forces withdrew from the country; 13 U.S. service members were killed in the attack. The Trump campaign has blamed President Biden and Vice President Harris, now the Democratic presidential nominee, for the chaotic withdrawal.

In a statement to NPR, Steven Cheung, the Trump campaign's spokesman, strongly rejected the notion of a physical altercation, adding: "We are prepared to release footage if such defamatory claims are made.

"The fact is that a private photographer was permitted on the premises and for whatever reason an unnamed individual, clearly suffering from a mental health episode, decided to physically block members of President Trump's team during a very solemn ceremony," Cheung said in the statement.

The Trump campaign declined to make that footage immediately available.

In a statement to NPR, Arlington National Cemetery said it "can confirm there was an incident, and a report was filed."


"Federal law prohibits political campaign or election-related activities within Army National Military Cemeteries, to include photographers, content creators or any other persons attending for purposes, or in direct support of a partisan political candidate's campaign," according to the statement. "Arlington National Cemetery reinforced and widely shared this law and its prohibitions with all participants."
 
"Federal law prohibits political campaign or election-related activities within Army National Military Cemeteries, to include photographers, content creators or any other persons attending for purposes, or in direct support of a partisan political candidate's campaign," according to the statement. "Arlington National Cemetery reinforced and widely shared this law and its prohibitions with all parparticipants.
It should be illegal. Politicization of a military cemetery is so beyond disgusting and offensive. Shows how little he cares about people and soldiers in particular.
 

Black Trump supporter claims he was called a ‘slave’ by right-wing organization he was canvassing for​


Adie-hard Trumper in Florida says he was discriminated against by a right-wing political advocacy group, claiming he was called a “slave” during his 12 days with the organization before it fired him for complaining.

Carl Baxter, who is Black, is suing Americans for Prosperity, the nonprofit “grassroots” conservative operation run by Charles and David Koch, the billionaire siblings and hard-line climate change deniers.


Baxter serves as president of the Republican Club of North & East Fort Myers, and is not at all shy about his outsized affection for Donald Trump. He can be seen on social media at Trump appearances, waving a MAGA flag at a “Trump Truck Parade,” at charity galas giving the camera a Trumpian “thumbs-up,” and donning a red MAGA hat and posing with, among others, a county tax collector who has come out as a vociferous opponent of critical race theory.

AFP, which has been around since 2004, gained prominence after Barack Obama was sworn in as president. It has traditionally focused on hollowing out workers’ rights, blocking Medicaid expansion, kneecapping green energy initiatives, and pushing down the minimum wage. Since 2010, some 42 percent of AFP’s ads have been rated “false” by PolitiFact, the nonpartisan fact-checking website; none have been rated “true.” The group backed Trump’s UN ambassador Nikki Haley in the 2024 presidential race before the former South Carolina governor bowed out in March.


Trump chafed at AFP’s support of Haley, posting last January to his flailing Twitter clone, Truth Social: “American’s [sic] for No Prosperity, who made more money during the Trump years than at any other time, are stupid people who are backing Birdbrain as she goes down tubes. Bad timing Charles!”


Baxter’s lawsuit, which was filed Monday and obtained by The Independent, describes him as “an African-American businessman who is active in local politics.” It says he was brought on by AFP in June 2023 to work as a part-time “grassroots associate.” Baxter’s duties “consisted of canvassing neighborhoods to talk with voters about AFP-selected policy issues and driving to and from those neighborhoods,” according to the suit.



AFP agreed to pay Baxter $20 an hour for the door-knocking duties, plus an unspecified mileage reimbursement, the lawsuit states. He started on June 14, 2023, and his job performance, according to the suit, “was exemplary.”

However, the lawsuit says Baxter quickly became disenchanted with AFP.

“Early in Plaintiff’s tenure, AFP’s Deputy Director [of] Grassroots… met Plaintiff at the Oasis restaurant in downtown Ft. Myers and offered Plaintiff $500 in bribe money to provide ‘dirt’ on Cape Coral councilmember, Patty Cummings,” the suit alleges. “Plaintiff declined. AFP’s goal was to stop President Donald J. Trump from winning the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential primaries and, locally, to oppose politicians who support President Trump.”

Baxter also felt AFP was not giving him “credit for all the hours he worked and for all the doors that he knocked on,” and shorting him on his pay, the lawsuit contends. So, 12 days into the job, the suit says he raised his concerns on a phone call with his supervisor, AFP Grassroots Engagement Director Roxanne Buckels.


Buckels, who is white, according to Baxter’s suit, “then proceeded to call [him] a ‘slave’ and demanded that he confirm he is a ‘slave,’ stating as follows: ‘I know you are doing the work and I can see the doors that you are hitting on my iPad on my side. At least you are working as a slave (sarcastically) but at least you are getting paid, many slaves today do get paid, many used to never get paid. Are you a slave?’”


Baxter was “highly offended,” and “demanded to speak with Ms. Buckels’ immediate supervisor,” the lawsuit goes on. Buckels then arranged a conference call with her boss, who is also white, according to the suit, to discuss Baxter’s concerns. A few minutes later, the supervisor called back, with AFP’s state operations director on the line — a white woman, the lawsuit says — and “terminated Plaintiff’s employment without notice, effective immediately.”

The lawsuit says Baxter still has not received the wages AFP owes him, nor has he been paid back for any of his mileage. By the same token, Baxter claims in his suit that AFP paid its white employees without issue. The suit accuses AFP of race discrimination, retaliation, and wage theft, and demands back pay and legal fees, as well as exemplary, punitive, and compensatory damages “for Plaintiff’s emotional pain and suffering.”


An AFP spokesperson told The Independent, “While we do not comment on current litigation, we take all allegations of violations of the law extremely seriously and will fully investigate those made in this complaint.”

Baxter’s attorney, Jay Lechter, told The Independent, “My client simply wants justice and to ensure that this does not happen to anyone else.”

A source with direct knowledge of the situation noted that Baxter was technically working for AFP as a contractor, and said AFP was not in fact his direct employer.

Buckels did not respond to a request for comment.
No Way Wow GIF
 
Trump is now saying that GOD saved him from assassination in order for him to save America


Trump says that God saved him from assassination because our country is being destroyed and God wants him to save it.

 
The first rioter to breach the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 attack was sentenced to more than four years in prison Tuesday after he told a judge he still believes Donald Trump's lies about the 2020 election.

 
Back
Top