No just treat people equally. And have the government work for citizens instead of citizens working for the government.So pro-seniors and anti-future citizens.
Really not hard to understand.
No just treat people equally. And have the government work for citizens instead of citizens working for the government.So pro-seniors and anti-future citizens.
Nope, the ideal isn't hard to "understand." It is the math of it that isn't possible.No just treat people equally. And have the government work for citizens instead of citizens working for the government.
Really not hard to understand.
Trump is literally proposing tariffs of up to 100% and actually said he was going to do it in a way it's not a tax on the American people.....if you reject tax hikes u have to reject Trump on Tariffs aloneNo just treat people equally. And have the government work for citizens instead of citizens working for the government.
Really not hard to understand.
I do. 100% tariffs are a horrible idea.Trump is literally proposing tariffs of up to 100% and actually said he was going to do it in a way it's not a tax on the American people.....if you reject tax hikes u have to reject Trump on Tariffs alone
So is an unrealized gains tax. I just don't think the issue is a matter of "fairness" as there is a TON of unfairness in government policy, most of which is geared toward benefiting the people this tax would hit.I do. 100% tariffs are a horrible idea.
Nate Silver out w a 1.9 point weekly bump for Harris after day 3 but before day 4 and her speech. Also before the bribe to RFK jr.He just constantly creates his own reality and all the people around him keep the grift up for him and pretend it's real
"She's not having success. I'm having success!" Former President Trump dismisses the notion that VP Kamala Harris is having "success" in polls. (TLP)
Chris Sapphire (@mrchrissapphire) on Threads
"She's not having success. I'm having success!" Former President Trump dismisses the notion that VP Kamala Harris is having "success" in polls. (TLP)www.threads.net
I get what you are saying now and largely agree, but do we know that those officers in that picture were there in endorsement of Trump rather than as part of some security detail?
I certainly don’t and I’m not really challenging you to prove it one way or the other. Your point is still valid either way.
I don’t even know Michigan law, so I can say with any level of assurance.Michigan sheriff under investigation for hosting Trump campaign stop
Two complaints filed with the state allege Livingston County Sheriff Mike Murphy violated the Michigan Campaign Finance Act.www.mlive.com
So... maybe some aspects of it weren't legal
I think the investigation is is that it is illegal to hold political events at tax payer funded buildings and the sheriff let trump hold his event at the sheriff's headquarters building ....I think that is the part that is against Michigan state lawI don’t even know Michigan law, so I can say with any level of assurance.
Should we really judge people how they acted 40 years ago? Walz got a DUI 30 years ago and made changes, I am not going to judge him for that. Why should I judge RFK Jr about how he acted in college IF he has changed.Best selling author claims RFK Jr sold him Coke at Harvard
"A friend told me about a kid in our class who was selling coke. The dealer was Bobby Kennedy," Kurt Andersen wrote in The Atlantic.
The Daily Beast (@thedailybeast) on Threads
"A friend told me about a kid in our class who was selling coke. The dealer was Bobby Kennedy," Kurt Andersen wrote in The Atlantic.www.threads.net
He blatantly utilizes others work and ignores intellectual property like ChinaTrump's campaign has illegally used songs from at least 18 different artists. He can no longer claim it was just an accident...
...it was intentional and blatant copyright infringement, aka THEFT.
18 Artists Who Have Hit Out At Donald Trump For Using Their Songs
Beyoncé and Céline Dion are the latest musicians to take issue with the former US president.www.huffingtonpost.co.uk
Agree. People go through challenges and judging them for something from decades if they have changed since then. Same for not canceling people for jokes from decades ago.Should we really judge people how they acted 40 years ago? Walz got a DUI 30 years ago and made changes, I am not going to judge him for that. Why should I judge RFK Jr about how he acted in college IF he has changed.
People already aren't being treated equally and that's the problem. We literally live in a country where the wealthiest of us are above the law. Money controls so much of our political system and our political system just keeps being rewritten to benefit the monied class.No just treat people equally. And have the government work for citizens instead of citizens working for the government.
Really not hard to understand.