No. But a tax on unrealized capital gains is a dumb policy. Doesn’t matter if it is to 100% of population or .1% of population.I knew you were the resident billionaire! You can't stealth wealth your way outta this one!
No. But a tax on unrealized capital gains is a dumb policy. Doesn’t matter if it is to 100% of population or .1% of population.I knew you were the resident billionaire! You can't stealth wealth your way outta this one!
Well, I am impressed you admit it is not a fair and just policy. Kudos.No, just policy talk that affects 0.14% of Americans . If Trump wants to win this, he doesn't spend time focusing and complaining about Policy that affects less than 70,000 total Americans
Especially a very small group of Americans he has already told at Mar A Lago he was going to give them a massive tax break too.
So the wealthiest class in this country have found a tax loophole by financing debt in order to avoid paying taxes. This seems like an attempt to address that loophole.No. But a tax on unrealized capital gains is a dumb policy. Doesn’t matter if it is to 100% of population or .1% of population.
Address that issue by making borrowing more than your basis in the stock you use as collateral taxable. If you borrow $50M against a stock that has a basis of $10M —- then you have a $40M taxable capital net gain. To keep from getting double taxed you receive a step-up to your basis.So the wealthiest class in this country have found a tax loophole by financing debt in order to avoid paying taxes. This seems like an attempt to address that loophole.
Closing the billionaire borrowing loophole would strengthen the progressivity of the U.S. tax code
How closing the borrowing loophole on the super wealthy would combat U.S. income inequality and raise more than $100 billion for our nation.equitablegrowth.org
Lol, no wonder we're close to agreeing here! Thanks for the info btw. I don't have any strong opinions on this except that taxing unrealized gains on every American would be terrible. I actually don't agree with taxing realized gains either since we're the ones taking all the risk.Address that issue by making borrowing more than your basis in the stock you use as collateral taxable. If you borrow $50M against a stock that has a basis of $10M —- then you have a $40M taxable capital net gain. To keep from getting double taxed you receive a step-up to your basis.
This would be a more fair, just, and feasible way to enforce.
EDIT: Just now reading your link and see they propose a similar solution. I guess we both read Bill Ackman.
BREAKING: RFK Jr. claims Trump asked for him to join his administration.
"He has asked to enlist me in his administration."
American Bridge 21st Century (@american_bridge) on Threads
BREAKING: RFK Jr. claims Trump asked for him to join his administration. "He has asked to enlist me in his administration."www.threads.net
Trump's tax cuts were not fair and just. For some reason, no cries out of you about those.So that makes it fair and just?
Trump's tax cuts were not fair and just. For some reason, no cries out fo you about those.
JT only cares about lowering taxes. It's literally his only wish in this world. He wants to not pay taxes no matter what has to be given up. All taxes are unjust to him so anything that lowers them is the best thing ever.Trump's tax cuts were not fair and just. For some reason, no cries out fo you about those.
You are close to correct. Personal freedoms that don’t negatively affect public safety are definitely my #1 political issue. And taxes definitely play a part in that.JT only cares about lowering taxes. It's literally his only wish in this world. He wants to not pay taxes no matter what has to be given up. All taxes are unjust to him so anything that lowers them is the best thing ever.
Maybe a bit if exaggeration but not much.
Picking certain industries that are favored over others is not just, not fair, and is unjust to far more people than a tax on 0.14% of the population.Not just? Government revenue is money taken from taxpayers. Taking less from taxpayers and giving more personal freedoms to citizens should be something we all value. Even with the reduction, government revenues increased.
Not fair? JTCA not only lowered most every tax bracket, and according to both the NYTimes and WaPo lowered overall incomes taxes for a majority of Americans, but it has also doubled the standard deduction.
So pro-seniors and anti-future citizens.You are close to correct. Personal freedoms that don’t negatively affect public safety are definitely my #1 political issue. And taxes definitely play a part in that.
To be clear, I don’t advocate zero taxes. And very pro Social Security for our seniors. Just limited taxes to go with a limited government.