tie breakers

[orngblkzebra]

The other funny part about all the flubbering is...there are 2 games left. Its not as though OSU, KSU, ut, or utn are guaranteed to win out...havent looked to see if its possible but what if it ends up being ISU & KU? (To the goon crybabies) Just shut up already...

 

[Cowboyshoopspride]

Absolute classic:

https://x.com/dryfitvenables/status/1724908061951955268?s=46&t=uQxvOJYIvmPSClucRxfnYw

Non con should matter in conference rules…….

 

[Functianalyst]

Go take a look at the rule on their website. Not one word changed. All they did today was tell us that head-to-head is the first tiebreaker. Which is the way it poorly reads. The way it reads now (and always has) does NOT say what many interpreted it to say.

That's how I see it as well. People keep saying they changed the rule and I don't see where any written language changed. They merely articulated their interpretation of the rule as it currently reads. So no change but simple clarification of the guideline.

As a K-State fan I very much want to get back to the title game, but anyone claiming it's not the Pokes to lose is simply being irrational at the moment. I must say that if OSU loses and allows OU back into the title game, I will be pissed. No pressure.

 

[PF5]

midnight toker:

 

[CptnQuirk]

midnight toker:


View attachment 2406

Well, toker is in his name.

 

[Midnight Toker]

That is ridiculous flawed logic. If something is obviously wrong, it should be corrected, or clarified as soon as it can be, regardless of when that is. If it was one day before it would be better to correct it than to have some misplaced sense of proper timing that caused the conference to allow a flawed Rule to adversely and unfairly affect the outcome of a season. You act like it would make some sort of difference in how hard the teams played. It has no bearing on games or a team’s performance other than to correct an egregious wrong before allowing it to happen and cause an unjust outcome. Stop crying!

Nobody is crying. If anyone is crying it'd be a ksu fan. I am observing that rules changes should never occur in season.

Nobody thought there was anything wrong with it when everyone agreed to it. Not until they saw who it would have screwed over that it suddenly becomes a problem.

 

[Midnight Toker]

@Midnight Toker

but im right

 

[Midnight Toker]

See?

Absolutely no need to “talk it out”.

Now go cry yourself to sleep.

Just doing what you did.

You're wrong, it's not a big deal, you're wrong.

 

[Midnight Toker]

The other funny part about all the flubbering is...there are 2 games left. Its not as though OSU, KSU, ut, or utn are guaranteed to win out...havent looked to see if its possible but what if it ends up being ISU & KU? (To the goon crybabies) Just shut up already...

if anyone is crying, it'd be the team who gets screwed by the rules change- fans of kansas state. this changes nothing for OU's trajectory so there's no reason to misrepresent my response

 

[Midnight Toker]

midnight toker:


View attachment 2406

I make relevant points whether you like it or not

 

[Midnight Toker]

That's how I see it as well. People keep saying they changed the rule and I don't see where any written language changed. They merely articulated their interpretation of the rule as it currently reads. So no change but simple clarification of the guideline.

As a K-State fan I very much want to get back to the title game, but anyone claiming it's not the Pokes to lose is simply being irrational at the moment. I must say that if OSU loses and allows OU back into the title game, I will be pissed. No pressure.

Articulated it for who? the member schools were already aware and agreed to the tie breaker rules.

 

[Midnight Toker]

Absolute classic:

https://x.com/dryfitvenables/status/1724908061951955268?s=46&t=uQxvOJYIvmPSClucRxfnYw

Non con should matter in conference rules…….

That would really suck for osu, getting blown out by a g5 is pretty bad

 

[Duke Silver]

7 post in a row trying to get the last word on every single post.


Lunatic

 

[Midnight Toker]

7 post in a row trying to get the last word on every single post.


Lunatic

If youre so desperate to get in the last word, i'll let you have it and then we can lock the thread. Then you win.

 

[Duke Silver]

If youre so desperate to get in the last word, i'll let you have it and then we can lock the thread. Then you win.

Another last word

 

[Midnight Toker]

Another last word

yep.

BUT, If youre so desperate to get in the last word, i'll let you have it and then we can lock the thread. Then you win.

Deal?

 

[PF5]

 

[CowboyJD]

Just doing what you did.

You're wrong, it's not a big deal, you're wrong.

Good to see you back after a night crying in your pillow like I instructed.

Cool beans.

Thanks for proving my point.

 

[CptnQuirk]

T

Nobody is crying. If anyone is crying it'd be a ksu fan. I am observing that rules changes should never occur in season.

Nobody thought there was anything wrong with it when everyone agreed to it. Not until they saw who it would have screwed over that it suddenly becomes a problem.

They didn’t change the rule. They clarified it. I said what it was before they clarified it.

 

[007Poke]

Trying to have an intelligent conversation with a goon is somewhat like conversing with a rock, with the main difference being the rock will at some point understand what is being said.