Georgia Poke
Ranger
If I understand it correctly, we own the tie-breakers over OU and KSU, but ISU has it on us. Is this correct?
ISU's remaining games are Texas and KSU.
ISU's remaining games are Texas and KSU.
The media could be wrong. In fact, local media will say what they want in order to bring grief to OSU.According to media reports if it's a 3 way tie between OU KState and us... the fact we beat them both is irrelevant because they didn't play each other. So we might actually miss out on the game because it goes to record over next highest placed team which could be Iowa State. If it's Kansas the we get in. So much dumb from the Big 12.
Have you even read the tiebreaker rules?The more I look into this. As long as kstate wins out they are in if it's a 3 way tie. Their wins over ku and isu get them in as OU and OSU are each 1-1. We are toast even if we win out.
In order for us to get in we need to win out AND OU or kstate need to lose 1. This is not good.
OU hasn't played Kstate. It goes to next highest team. If ISU is 1-1 the next 2 weeks they are ahead of KU who will have lost to KSU. If ISU loses both they tie with KU if KU beats Cincinnati. Then since they are both tied you look at cumulative and Kstate would be 2-0. OU and us 1-1. Kstate gets in.Three (or more) team-ties
In the event of a tie between more than two teams, the following procedures will be used. After one team has an advantage and is “seeded”, all remaining teams in the multiple-team tiebreaker will repeat the multiple-team tie-breaking procedure. If at any point the multiple-team tie is reduced to two teams, the two-team tie-breaking procedure will be applied.
- Head-to-head (best cumulative win percentage in games among the tied teams). If not, every tied team has played each other, go to step 2.
- Record against the next highest placed common opponent in the standings (based on record in all games played within the conference), proceeding through the standings. Note: When arriving at another group of tied teams while comparing records, use each team’s win percentage against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to that group’s own tie-breaking procedure) rather than the performance against individual tied teams.
- Win percentage against all common conference opponents (must be common among all teams involved in the tie).
- Combined win percentage in conference games of conference opponents (ie, strength of conference schedule).
- Total number of wins in a 12-game season. The following conditions will apply to the calculation of the total number of wins: 1. Only one win against a team from the NCAA Football Championship Subdivision or lower division will be counted annually. 2. Any games that are exempted from counting against the annual maximum number of football contests per NCAA rules. (current Bylaw 17.10.5.2.1) shall not be included.
- Highest ranking by SportSource Analytics (team Rating Score metric) following the last weekend of regular-season games.
- Coin toss
OU hasn't played Kstate. It goes to next highest team. If ISU is 1-1 the next 2 weeks they are ahead of KU who will have lost to KSU. If ISU loses both they tie with KU if KU beats Cincinnati. Then since they are both tied you look at cumulative and Kstate would be 2-0. OU and us 1-1. Kstate gets in.
This is my thought. As @CowboyJD has said, the second sentence of #1 is poorly worded. In my opinion it reads,I would argue that whether the other two played is a moot point. One would win and the other lose. Regardless, Neither would have as high a percentage of wins amongst the three teams as we do. The only way percentages don’t matter is if all three are 50% amongst the three if they all played each other.
YesView attachment 2352
We are going to get screwed aren’t we?
Most likely in this scenario the next common opponent would fall to UCF...View attachment 2352
We are going to get screwed aren’t we?
Iowa StateMost likely in this scenario the next common opponent would fall to UCF...