Funny Political Memes

You are new.
Or you got promoted.

So they are firing new people (maybe not unreasonable but given the hiring freeze most new people were in short staffed areas) or they are firing people who were good enough to get promoted to a new job.

The idea that this is in any way getting rid of poor performers is not realistic. Pretty much doing the opposite since poor performance tends to not get promoted.
Actually, pretty poor business runners
 
What may normally happen is not what is happening now.

My point that you can choose to believe or not, is that the current firing is simply getting rid of workers. They aren't getting rid of weaker workers. If anything, probably a little bit they are getting rid of better workers.
Is this your opinion?
 
Good luck with that. You are taking about millions of emails that no one is going to take the time to look at.

If you truly believe this, welcome to the libs. You can now purchase an electric vehicle (but not a tesla). For lunch their is ethically sourced vegan fare. The socialism now meeting is at 2.
Why wouldn't a manager be required to do it in the first place?
Seems like a lot of speculation going on just to get fired tf up to me.
 
Because of years of conditioning by far right at the government lazy people that are stealing their taxes.

I don't think people fully realized who government workers are. They thought of government workers as people in DC who spend their time making copies and hanging out at the water cooler. They don't think about their neighbor Jim who works at the park. Then all the sudden a bunch of people they know as decent hardworking people are out of a job. They didn't think that their vote would have a negative impact on them because they saw problems as far away, but unfortunately elections have consequences and this is one of them.
 
I don't think people fully realized who government workers are. They thought of government workers as people in DC who spend their time making copies and hanging out at the water cooler. They don't think about their neighbor Jim who works at the park. Then all the sudden a bunch of people they know as decent hardworking people are out of a job. They didn't think that their vote would have a negative impact on them because they saw problems as far away, but unfortunately elections have consequences and this is one of them.
If Jim isn't doing an acceptable job why should taxpayer money be paying them. Why should government employees be treated any different than non-gov.

I think you're overthinking this and are taking it as an assault on good workers and not a purging of unnecessary spending, which is necessary to even begin to pull us out of debt.
 
If Jim isn't doing an acceptable job why should taxpayer money be paying them. Why should government employees be treated any different than non-gov.

I think you're overthinking this and are taking it as an assault on good workers and not a purging of unnecessary spending, which is necessary to even begin to pull us out of debt.
Jim gets paid $50-$70 K a year in taxpayer money to do that job. + another $100K in Lifetime benefits...Jim has great reviews from his boss and has a solid history of performing well in his job.


Trump Spent $20 MILLION of Tax Payer Money so do hot laps in the Beast at the Daytona 500 and To attend the Super Bowl and leave at Halftime.

He has spent over $100 MILLION in Tax Payer Money protecting him and his folks while they play golf in Florida since he has been POTUS>

THAT IS AN ASSULT on good works and NOT PURGING unnecessary Spending.

Please explain to me why Jim's job isn't worth it and is a burden on Tax Payers, but Trump doing Hot laps at Daytona and Attending the Super Bowl isn't a burden and should be expected from the Tax Payers.


FYI it would Take 705 YEARS of Jim's Salary and Benefits to Cover Trump's Trip to the Dayton 500, Play Golf, and Attend the Super Bowl until Half Time


Cuts to Thee but Not to Me. SO are we REALLY trying to make savings here is we Aren't ALL going to attempt to save ? At what Point is Hypocrisy just too mush ???
 
Jim gets paid $50-$70 K a year in taxpayer money to do that job. + another $100K in Lifetime benefits...Jim has great reviews from his boss and has a solid history of performing well in his job.


Trump Spent $20 MILLION of Tax Payer Money so do hot laps in the Beast at the Daytona 500 and To attend the Super Bowl and leave at Halftime.

He has spent over $100 MILLION in Tax Payer Money protecting him and his folks while they play golf in Florida since he has been POTUS>

THAT IS AN ASSULT on good works and NOT PURGING unnecessary Spending.

Please explain to me why Jim's job isn't worth it and is a burden on Tax Payers, but Trump doing Hot laps at Daytona and Attending the Super Bowl isn't a burden and should be expected from the Tax Payers.


FYI it would Take 705 YEARS of Jim's Salary and Benefits to Cover Trump's Trip to the Dayton 500, Play Golf, and Attend the Super Bowl until Half Time
The Obamas spent 3 days on a "goodwill mission" to India and rented all 578 rooms of the Taj Hotel at a cost of around 250million.

Use a different argument.
 
If Jim isn't doing an acceptable job why should taxpayer money be paying them. Why should government employees be treated any different than non-gov.

I think you're overthinking this and are taking it as an assault on good workers and not a purging of unnecessary spending, which is necessary to even begin to pull us out of debt.
You keep going back to that assumption that Jim isn't doing an acceptable job. There is no selectivity to limit the mass firings to people not doing their jobs. Like we've all said. If DOGE wants to go through and fire everyone not pulling their weight, that's fine and appreciated. But what is happening isn't that.
 
Rob or ChatGPT? The reader can decide.View attachment 9964
Yep, I just make shit up.


 
Last edited:
Yep, I just make shit up.


it´s not you making $hi! up, itś just being gullible...

As FactCheck.org notes, there is no evidence to support the $200 million figure (other than the anonymous quote), and it seems like a serious stretch in light of the fact that the entire war in Afghanistan costs less on a daily basis.

Writing about the initial report, the Wall Street Journal calls it "demonstrably incorrect" even without considering the $200 million claim.

"It says the White House had blocked off the entire Taj Mahal Hotel in Mumbai - it hasn't - and that the press traveling with Mr. Obama will be staying there. We won't," writes Jonathan Weisman. "Besides, the press pays its own way at considerable cost to the media outlets, not the U.S. taxpayer."
 
This is what happens when an authoritarian attacks legit media for years, saying you can't believe any of it. That the only truths come out of his team. And then attacks the people fact checking his claims, saying you can't believe them either. It's terrifying
 
The Obamas spent 3 days on a "goodwill mission" to India and rented all 578 rooms of the Taj Hotel at a cost of around 250million.

Use a different argument.
Why use a different argument when that's the very type of fraud, waste, and unnecessary spending Trump is claiming to eliminate?

It's really hard to make the "whatabout....yeah, but...." response when it comes to wasteful spending when you've run on a "we won't do what Obama did" platform.
 
Back
Top