Every time I see someone use Nebraska as an example of why not to fire a coach I always want to ask, what proof do you have that Nebraska would not be in the exact same situation they are in now if they had kept their coach? Did Solich go to another blue blood program and build a dynasty? If he was such a good coach how come he was never pulled away from Ohio? You assume that they would be better but you have no idea.
Same with Mack brown, are you assuming that he would have won more national championships at Texas? In the last 5 years UNC is 1-3 in bowl games with a win over temple.
Did both of those coaches get fired prematurely? Yes I would say so, but to pretend that you know for a fact that those two programs would be better off if they had kept those coaches is false.
No one knows what will happen after Gundy but I know for a fact that he has 1 Big XII championship in 18 years, if that’s acceptable to you then ya you probably don’t support a change.
Mack Brown was a Colt McCoy blown shoulder away from winning a second BCS championship at Texas. Even after McCoy went down they still had a chance to win with Gilbert Godfried at QB.
One Big 12 championship in 18 years doubled the number of Big 8/12 championships in our entire history. Am I happy with that? No. I am ecstatic that I have seen two in my lifetime.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk