Kind of a side discussion. Why the heck is our state dept setup with an elected superintendent and appointed board members? That's completely backwards of what it should be in my opinion. This setup makes the board susceptible to just being a rubber stamp that supports the superintendent. It makes no sense. Why is it not set up like actual school districts?
If we had an appointed superintendent with elected board members then we likely would not be where we are right now. Walters could have been dealt with long ago without Republican leaders using a weak "will of the people" excuse to not remove him and it's possible the board might have had at least 1 person stand up to him. Someone please make this current setup make sense...
Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
If we had an appointed superintendent with elected board members then we likely would not be where we are right now. Walters could have been dealt with long ago without Republican leaders using a weak "will of the people" excuse to not remove him and it's possible the board might have had at least 1 person stand up to him. Someone please make this current setup make sense...
Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk