According to whom? BTW, I noticed you changed your signature line. Finally coming around?
According to whom? BTW, I noticed you changed your signature line. Finally coming around?
Even if your graph is correct, how does this support eliminating someone from a ballot?
Where did I "think" any of this? This works far better when I say what I feel and you say what you feel.Pretty much yeah. My point is you think its ok for one party to be able to run their candidate AND determine who the opposition candidate will be based on "crimes" that the opposing candidate has not been convicted of at this point. In what bizzario world does that make sense? You say that Trump is guilty of "insurrection". Convict him and then we can talk about the legality of him holding an elected office. Until then all of this is just a desperate grasp by a terrified party that got 81 million votes for a dementia riddled professional grifter and spent the entire campaign secluded in his basement as far away from a microphone as possible and still beat Trump. What's all the fuss about? If you can beat him with Biden surely you can beat him with anybody.
my graph has nothing to do with the ballots...you seem to make a habit of jumping in on someone else's back and forth and make no sense...try reading for comprehension...I merely was replying to an article calling joe a liar...I found it ironic...Even if your graph is correct, how does this support eliminating someone from a ballot?
according to politifact...btw, thanks for noticing, and coming around to what?? your backwards ways?? lol, no chanceAccording to whom? BTW, I noticed you changed your signature line. Finally coming around?
Fair enough. AI is a huge concern of mine as well.Where did I "think" any of this? This works far better when I say what I feel and you say what you feel.
I do not feel that it is wise for Trump to be removed without due process. Never said otherwise.
I do not feel that the comments that Clinton etc made come anywhere close to what Trump did but I can see that starting the "illegitimate" talk was a bad idea and led to Trump doubling down on it.
I have real concerns that AI will make it so that we have no idea what is reality in the future.
Palestine breathes a sigh of relief!according to politifact...btw, thanks for noticing, and coming around to what?? your backwards ways?? lol, no chance
So you’re ok with removing Biden from state ballots for treason, or taking bribes, or wire fraud, or just being an incredible dumbass? Hell, let’s just let the ruling party in each state remove all of the opposition candidates from their ballot and skip the election altogether. It is “democracy in action “ after all. What an absolutely ridiculous argument.States Rights!!! Until they start to exercise those rights and now it's all......that's unfair
Each state has a set of laws and processes to determine who can and can not be in the ballot......that's their decision to make ...because your state thinks differently doesn't mean your right and they are wrong.
If the citizens of a state are upset at who decides to keep Trump off the ballot then ..SHOCKER...the citizens of that state have a way to remove and replace those officials via voting.
This is exactly how strong states Rights works why is anyone surprised and upset by actual democracy in action??
If you support Texas enacting (correctly IMHO) laws to arrest illegals then you damn well better back states for choosing how their own elections are run ...same concept of State power and control
There is actual audio of Trump and and others trying to convince a State official to not certify an election while multiple people have plead guilty in in multiple states COURT of trying to sneak in fake electors to vote for Trump
If a state doesn't think that person who is entangled in a lawsuit in which multiple people have plead guilty to trying to subvert the 2020 election .than that is exactly what a state should decide in accordance with their own laws and rules
I was about to say this. Republicans are in charge of a majority of statesSo you’re ok with removing Biden from state ballots for treason, or taking bribes, or wire fraud, or just being an incredible dumbass? Hell, let’s just let the ruling party in each state remove all of the opposition candidates from their ballot and skip the election altogether. It is “democracy in action “ after all. What an absolutely ridiculous argument.
View attachment 2945
I was about to say this. Republicans are in charge of a majority of states
Biden will not be on New Hampshire or North Carolina primary ballotsSo you’re ok with removing Biden from state ballots for treason, or taking bribes, or wire fraud, or just being an incredible dumbass? Hell, let’s just let the ruling party in each state remove all of the opposition candidates from their ballot and skip the election altogether. It is “democracy in action “ after all. What an absolutely ridiculous argument.
View attachment 2945
And Biden is also under review to not appear on Florida , Massachusetts, and Tennessee primary ballots as well
But please go on and tell me how these blue States are attacking Trump only
Not even remotely the same.Biden will not be on New Hampshire or North Carolina primary ballots
Yes. The DNC is not holding primaries in those states and just submitting Biden as the winner.Isn’t this all because as I said above the DNC is choosing not to hold primaries in those states?
YepIsn’t this all because as I said above the DNC is choosing not to hold primaries in those states?
Yes. The DNC is not holding primaries in those states and just submitting Biden as the winner
Doesn't matter if it is the same...it is elected officials in their states choosing to keep a candidate name off their ballots following the rules and laws the state has in place and it's just how it is.Not even remotely the same.
Biden will not be on the New Hampshire primary ballot. What does that mean for voters?
President Joe Biden wasn't successful in unseating New Hampshire from the first-in-the-nation primary slot it has held for more than a century, but his decision not to appear on the state's 2024 primary ballot has nonetheless added a new wrinkle to the contest and created complications for his...www.pbs.org
The DNC adopted the president’s proposal and scheduled the South Carolina primary to lead the party’s nomination process on Feb. 3, with New Hampshire and Nevada to follow on Feb. 6.
However, New Hampshire indicated its intent to maintain its first-in-the-nation primary status in violation of party rules and risk possible penalties from the DNC down the road. Rather than flout the rules he urged the national party to adopt, Biden chose to stay off the ballot in New Hampshire.
Decision to put only Biden's name on the FL ballot in March 2024 spawned a federal lawsuit • Florida Phoenix
A Tampa attorney has filed a federal lawsuit against the Florida Democratic Party (FDP) for placing only President Joe Biden’s name on the ballot for the March 2024 presidential primary election in Florida. Other Democrats challenging Biden for the party’s nomination were excluded. Democratic...floridaphoenix.com