Harris 2024 election thread

Hell of a Readers Note


View attachment 5948
Police officer continued to attack him even after he surrendered and put down his recently fired gun. Glad the cop was charged and admitted his guilt.

But that doesn’t change the fact Stallings fired his gun at a SWAT vehicle during the riots. That’s no bueno!
Not sure why someone would view this as a good thing for Harris.
 
Police officer continued to attack him even after he surrendered and put down his recently fired gun. Glad the cop was charged and admitted his guilt.

But that doesn’t change the fact Stallings fired his gun at a SWAT vehicle during the riots. That’s no bueno!
Not sure why someone would view this as a good thing for Harris.
It isn't viewed as a positive for Harris ..Trump's campaign social media literally called her a radical liberal and dangerously incompetent for raising money used for bailing out a person accused of a crime, they were yet to stand trial for


How is doing this completely legal act of helping an accused person legally bail out of jail prior to their court date make her Liberal or dangerous??
 
Police officer continued to attack him even after he surrendered and put down his recently fired gun. Glad the cop was charged and admitted his guilt.

But that doesn’t change the fact Stallings fired his gun at a SWAT vehicle during the riots. That’s no bueno!
Not sure why someone would view this as a good thing for Harris.
I see nothing wrong with what Harris did...read the first article...


 
How is doing this completely legal act of helping an accused person legally bail out of jail prior to their court date make her Liberal or dangerous??
Not debating the legal right for Harris to support people committing felonies and destroying property during the Floyd riots/protests.

Just like considering pardoning people who were convicted of rioting… Fundraising to support people committing felonies is questionable decision for a political leader. And certainly fair game for criticism.
 
Not debating the legal right for Harris to support people committing felonies and destroying property during the Floyd riots/protests.

Just like considering pardoning people who were convicted of rioting… Fundraising to support people committing felonies is not a great look. And certainly fair game for criticism.
Stallings was acquitted...and tr Trump campaign SPECIFICALLY attack her on THIS case

1000002458.png
 
Not debating the legal right for Harris to support people committing felonies and destroying property during the Floyd riots/protests.

Just like considering pardoning people who were convicted of rioting… Fundraising to support people committing felonies is questionable decision for a political leader. And certainly fair game for criticism.
95% of Floyd protests were peaceful...how did she support people committing felonies?...is that similar to people supporting a person committing felonies for president?!
 
95% of Floyd protests were peaceful...how did she support people committing felonies?...is that similar to people supporting a person committing felonies for president?!
$2B of damage occurred during summer riots. They were not peaceful.

Yes, as I said. Supporting fundraising to support people committing felonies deserves similar questions as Trump considering pardons for J6 felons.
 
In his Tuesday show, Gerald Celente forecasted that Harris would win the election due to abortion rights. He doesn't like her hypocritical stand for being pro mandatory on vaccines and is full of sh!t, but she will win, barring a wild card. He also said that the Feds will lower interest rates to pump up Harris and that means higher gold prices.
 
Police officer continued to attack him even after he surrendered and put down his recently fired gun. Glad the cop was charged and admitted his guilt.

But that doesn’t change the fact Stallings fired his gun at a SWAT vehicle during the riots. That’s no bueno!
Not sure why someone would view this as a good thing for Harris.
He was acquitted because they fired first, were not marked as police, his gun was legal, and he surrendered immediately when it was clear they were police. He acted as a citizen should. The police were no bueno.
 
He was acquitted because they fired first, were not marked as police, his gun was legal, and he surrendered immediately when it was clear they were police. He acted as a citizen should. The police were no bueno.
In the MIDDLE of riots he fired at a vehicle with people inside and you think that is how a citizen should act??
Maybe if he lived at the OK Corral.
 
In the MIDDLE of riots he fired at a vehicle with people inside and you think that is how a citizen should act??
Maybe if he lived at the OK Corral.
The POLICE SHOT FIRST ..FROM AN UNMARKED VAN....and did NOT identify themselves as police before they shot and he was carrying a legal firearm and returned fire when he was first Fired upon...I don't care if he did it in the middle of a riot or out on a walk in his own in the middle of night.....he did Everything any normal person legally carrying would have done in that instance

Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted and you think THIS guy was in the wrong ?!!?
 
Not debating the legal right for Harris to support people committing felonies and destroying property during the Floyd riots/protests.

Just like considering pardoning people who were convicted of rioting… Fundraising to support people committing felonies is questionable decision for a political leader. And certainly fair game for criticism.
Who did she support that committed a felony or destroyed property in this case?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PF5
Back
Top