Harris 2024 election thread

Donnyboy said:
If you stand up before a company wide meeting on the 13th and say you are going to retire there then get called into the board and them forcing you to resign on the 14th then yes.

Saying Biden “dropped out” is more mess like saying it’s just a stutter.

Vote for Harris for any of the reasons she presents in her campaign or just cause you hate Trump. Don’t continue the lunacy by acting like this was something other than him being ran out.
Click to expand...
... by not continuing to support him.
 
PF5 said:
I'll start...#1 she is not trump...
Click to expand...

I heard somebody say recently that in the old days, the Democrats would fall in love and the Republicans would fall in line meaning one would vote for their candidate and the other would just vote against that candidate. If that was true then it seems like we have come full circle with Republicans falling in love with Trump while Democrats are falling in line with whatever the party is telling them to accept.

I personally could never bring myself to vote for Trump so I completely understand why anyone else couldn't either. But I could also never bring myself to vote for Harris so I'll vote 3rd party and I wish more people would.
 
mugatu said:
... by not continuing to support him.
Click to expand...
Maybe we are all talking past each other because to me the phrase being forced out implies threat of violence or some other threat like 25th amendment. I do NOT believe either was present in this situation. Maybe to you being asked repeatedly (and probably sternly) to drop and told funding had dried up is forced out. That I do believe happened but it was HIS decision whether to act on those requests however persistent. Because I think it was HIS decision to actually drop I don't support the use of the phrase forced out... but whatever.

At this point I no longer care. I was going to vote for him assuming he wouldn't make it past a year or so anyway... so I'll now vote for the person I thought would finish the term anyway and continue to vote against Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PF5
mugatu said:
Maybe we are all talking past each other because to me the phrase being forced out implies threat of violence or some other threat like 25th amendment. I do NOT believe either was present in this situation. Maybe to you being asked repeatedly (and probably sternly) to drop and told funding had dried up is forced out. That I do believe happened but it was HIS decision whether to act on those requests however persistent. Because I think it was HIS decision to actually drop I don't support the use of the phrase forced out... but whatever.

At this point I no longer care. I was going to vote for him assuming he wouldn't make it past a year or so anyway... so I'll now vote for the person I thought would finish the term anyway and continue to vote against Trump.
Click to expand...
I think it was like Milton from Office Space. The donors fixed the glitch.
 
Rob B. said:
Kamala did a good thing for the guy who returned fire at the dirty cops.

Kamala did a bad thing here.

www.google.com

Kamala Harris-backed bail fund helped incarcerated man, now charged with murder, go free

A suspect released with the help of a nonprofit organization operating a Minnesota bail fund endorsed by Vice President Kamala Harris has now been charged with
www.google.com www.google.com
Click to expand...
The fund did a bad thing here. She supported them with post and donation in 2020. Did she instruct who received bail money 2 years later?
 
mugatu said:
The fund did a bad thing here. She supported them with post and donation in 2020. Did she instruct who received bail money 2 years later?
Click to expand...
Doesn't say, but supporting any organization that posts bond for repeat felons isn't a very good choice. I would hope she would research before giving support.
 
Rob B. said:
Kamala did a good thing for the guy who returned fire at the dirty cops.

Kamala did a bad thing here.

www.google.com

Kamala Harris-backed bail fund helped incarcerated man, now charged with murder, go free

A suspect released with the help of a nonprofit organization operating a Minnesota bail fund endorsed by Vice President Kamala Harris has now been charged with
www.google.com www.google.com
Click to expand...
It’s never a good look supporting people arrested for violent acts while “protesting” ..especially after telling people to never stop.
Now we have two Presidential candidates that are fair game for the opposition party to claim they supported riots.
 
Last edited:
mugatu said:
Are you comparing this to Jan 6...? The answer to your question is the same as the answer to this one. Where politicians rushed out by capital police while other police were fighting fir their lives trying to keep thousands out if the capital building? If so then yes, yes it would be am insurrection.
Click to expand...
I'm not comparing it to anything. Just asking if burning the flag, and replacing it with Palestinian one, while carrying Uncle Sam by a noose, at the nation's capital, should be considered an insurrection.
Treason maybe?
 
Rob B. said:
I'm not comparing it to anything. Just asking if burning the flag, and replacing it with Palestinian one, while carrying Uncle Sam by a noose, at the nation's capital, should be considered an insurrection.
Treason maybe?
Click to expand...
Treason requires aiding an enemy. Does this aide an enemy? It's a stupid annoying protest... in very poor taste but again constitutionally protected.
 
Rob B. said:
I'm not comparing it to anything. Just asking if burning the flag, and replacing it with Palestinian one, while carrying Uncle Sam by a noose, at the nation's capital, should be considered an insurrection.
Treason maybe?
Click to expand...
If they didn't have permission to assemble then and there it could be trespassing but I'm not sure the laws and stuff for assembly. Ask @CowboyJD he might know
 
mugatu said:
Just be clear. I hate to see this and it pisses me off but flag burning has been deemed a 1st amendment protected right.
Click to expand...
What about replacing a flag at a federal building and painting graffiti on federal building. Should that be deemed legal?
 
Rob B. said:
What about replacing a flag at a federal building and painting graffiti on federal building. Should that be deemed legal?
Click to expand...
No. Painting would be vandalism... not sure if the flag falls under that or not. If they kept it ir destroyed it thatcpuld fall under destruction of public property
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
No Labels 2024 Run
Replies
11
Views
606
Polds4OSU
P
P
Violence in Paris as Conservatives soundly defeated in General Election. UK Conservatives also soundly rejected by Voters
Replies
6
Views
192
PF5
PF5
P
Expelled Rep George Santos says he'll run for Congress again as independent after 'embarrassing showing' by GOP in House
Replies
1
Views
159
mugatu
mugatu
P
The RNC hires election denier Christina Bobb as a 'senior counsel for election integrity'
Replies
5
Views
375
Polds4OSU
P
P
Newsmax settles Smartmatic defamation suit over 2020 false election claims days before trial set to begin
Replies
2
Views
110
osu1983
O
Back
Top