Links please.
The internet is full of vague claims that so-and-so said. I need something concrete, specifics, like Vance laid out.
J D Vance Trump VP pick
- Thread starter Polds4OSU
- Start date
The internet is full of vague claims that so-and-so said. I need something concrete, specifics, like Vance laid out.
You know you’re not getting facts from him.
mugatu
Ranger
I will say I'm not a fan of the rental tax credit. I'm afraid that will just exacerbate the housing cost issue. Needs to instead be regulation on what can be charged.
Even I know I will at some point be dumb enough to respond to him again. No way he doesn’t respond to you.
Gun control, environmental policies , hate speech etc. I'm not saying total freedom is a panacea, but the republicans claiming freedom is yet another falsehood.
More mischaracterization and misleading.
I’m haven’t defended what Harris proposed while running for the nomination in 2020.
I’ve not once indicated I am in favor of those proposals.
Not once.
I’ve merely accurately established what those proposals actually are in response to your mischaracterizations.
And you posted two articles, thank you by the way, that confirmed my initial statement about her financial transaction tax.
Suggestion: Might want to read the article you post prior.
You clearly didn’t read beyond the headline to see what she actually said.
Par for the course.
Here’s a tip for you….headlines aren’t facts….quotes are facts.
You are funny
1) Transactional tax proposal: JD accidentally confirmed the accuracy of what I posted with his article links.
2) Defund the Police: I posted one article from CNN this week that included that in the headline. But of course “it’s (D)ifferent”. Not sure why people can’t read what she is quoted as saying.
3) Most liberal Senator by GovTrack
FACT CHECK: Was Kamala Harris Ranked The Most Liberal Senator By GovTrack?
GovTrack ranked Harris as the most liberal senator in 2019.
checkyourfact.com
Actually I erred here. She was talking about AOC and not Warren.
Last edited:
PF5
Ranger
I simply asked what defund the police means to you…I assume that you immediately think like a lot of repubs, and think it’s to do away with police…I also now must assume that you do not read the articles…finally I now assume that you like to argue to argue…I had a friend once who did that…wanted to argue and take a side to Anything but always lost on technicalities of not knowing wtf he was talking about…not saying that is you, just reminds me of him…
Then don’t be hypocritical. The inconsistency is remarkable. I started in this thread agreeing that what Vance said was stupid. Just like things that Harris has backed and said are worrisome to me. Yet, now you are splitting hairs of Harris’s word salad about defunding the police. Or CowboyJD remarkable lack of understanding regarding taxing transactions in 401Ks.
For me, I am much more worried about Harris raising taxes, introducing new taxes on retirement savings, and backing progressive policies that take away freedoms than I am with Vance’s stupid unconstitutional voting suggestion that takes away freedoms.
Last edited:
Speaking of hypocrisy and inconsistency…..
This “huge” tax bill someone’s claiming comes to $2,000 when I cash out a million dollars worth of stock from my 401(k).
And was specifically to fund a proposal that is no longer being advanced by Harris.
This “huge” tax bill someone’s claiming comes to $2,000 when I cash out a million dollars worth of stock from my 401(k).
And was specifically to fund a proposal that is no longer being advanced by Harris.
PF5
Ranger
Ok I’m done with the defund police talk…well, one more: she’s not wanting to do away with police!!
Where are you getting your info on her plans for taxes? I didn’t think she had come out with a plan yet…and what progressive policies?! Is that just a repub catch phrase?!