Bud Light Controversy Spreads to Target, Sending the Stock Lower
- Thread starter PF5
- Start date
He clearly said what he said just to provoke the homophobes like John Rich.
Heck, he called the folks boycotting Budweiser "a--holes" and told them they weren't welcome in his bar.
That's way more provocative that wishing homophobes an "uncomfortable month".
False. He is promoting "loving one another". Different motives altogether.
Sure thing pearlclutcher and all-knowing arbiter of every other person on earth's motives and intent.
PF5
Ranger
Interesting sentiment considering your post claiming to know his intent just two posts prior (quoted below).
He is telling homophobes to stay out and saying they are assholes. This sounds like the exact opposite of the message you want spread based on your comments on the other thread.
I quoted his post calling Bud Light boycotters assholes and saying they weren't welcome in his bar and pointed out that was more provocative than wisihing homophobes an "uncomfortable month".
And made fun of your repeated posts claiming to know people's intent and motives including this one to which I was responding where you commented on his motives and strategies....
You claim he seems to understand that being an a--hole isn't a great strategy.
He called people that disagree with him a--holes in his own statement. You're equating wishing someone an "uncomfortable month" with physical violence over and over again, but claim that calling a group of people a--holes is "understanding that being a a--hole isn't a great strategy"....and is a promoting "loving one another".....by calling other people a--holes.
Which is a moronic position to take.
He's not the one prowling around looking for a fight. He's responding to a specific inquiry on the subject. There's a big difference.
Calling people out for being a--holes is not the same as being an a--hole yourself. He's just taking the stance that he doesn't plan to accommodate a--holes, which is totally fair from the standpoint of being a business owner being asked specifically if he'll accommodate them.
I also noticed that you conveniently failed to address your own hypocrisy in the post above, and tried to wordsmith your way around it.
Last edited:
He's not telling them to stay out. He's just not going to accommodate their boycott.
I addressed your ridiculous claim of hypocrisy directly and explicitly you mope.
False. You sidestepped it.
PF5
Ranger
because a country music star opens a bar in Nashville, the 'capital' of country music??
Not really.....no.
You want to go to Nashville and absorb the atmosphere then do that. There are hundreds of old Nashville spots where history actually happened, take one of the many tours and learn who did what and where… but these celebrity named clip joints are the Family Dollar of bars that exist only to sell bad bar food and sell t shirts and tchotchkes to tourists. It’s not like Garth worked in this place or it was instrumental in the making of any of his music. It’ll be a TGI Friday’s with sawdust on the floor.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You presume a lot, but even if you are right about the nature of the bar….there isn’t anything particularly douchey about giving the mass of tourists what they want.
Probably wouldn’t be my cup of tea as I have my local Nashville joints that I prefer going to, but I don’t begrudge him opening it or the people that will want to go there.
Lots of people actually like TGI Friday’s. Maybe even prefer it over a…let’s say….a local hole in the wall taqueria or something. Different strokes and all that.
Similar threads
