US continues to go forward

I’m all for increased market-place competition…but does having a MAGA-heavy social media (TruthSocial) and a left-heaving social media (BlueSky) mean “US continues to move forward”? Just seems like we now have another echo chamber.
we will always have echo chambers...I don't know enough about bluesky to have an opinion if it is the 'opposite' of truth social (that name still cracks me up...oh, the irony)...but I'm all for having choices...will bluesky hurt twitter/x, will it fade away, will it hurt elon's ego?;
in the words of George Washington/Nate Bargatze nobody-knows-snl.gif

however, to answer your question, YES!
 
I agree this moves America forward if he goes away. I think him not going back to Congress is a good thing…..I also think he is about to be as high as he can be ranked without confirmation hearings so we may be putting his name in the US goes backwards thread soon.
Agreed. I'm sure Trump will put him somewhere that falls just below the confirmation line.
 
A new light is being shown on actions dividing Americans: New Rutgers University study shows that anti-racism trainings can lead people to accuse others of racism even when they’re not racist.

After going through DEI training the participants who were exposed to the racism scenario (vs control group) significantly imagined more racism, thought there was a lot more bias, and concluded actions of micro aggressions even when none were included in additional activities.

Additionally, the participants in the DEI study also wanted to punish the offenders even in the additional activities without racial components.


Full study review for those that want to read it: https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/Instructing-Animosity_11.13.24.pdf
 
This. Living the romanticized “1950’s lifestyle” is absolutely well within most people’s reach. It’s just that people in the 50’s dined at home, had one vehicle for the whole family, a landline if that, hand-me-down clothing, and most importantly look at that house. We’ve come to demand houses that are unnecessarily huge.
 
This. Living the romanticized “1950’s lifestyle” is absolutely well within most people’s reach. It’s just that people in the 50’s dined at home, had one vehicle for the whole family, a landline if that, hand-me-down clothing, and most importantly look at that house. We’ve come to demand houses that are unnecessarily huge.

You aren't wrong, but they also did it mostly on one income and there were good jobs available that didn't require a college degree, and if they did people didn't have to take on 6 figures of debt to pay for the degree.

I think its a combination of factors. We do try to live more extravagantly than people did 70 years ago, but it costs more to maintain a basic lifestyle our grandparents enjoyed.
 
You aren't wrong, but they also did it mostly on one income and there were good jobs available that didn't require a college degree, and if they did people didn't have to take on 6 figures of debt to pay for the degree.

I think its a combination of factors. We do try to live more extravagantly than people did 70 years ago, but it costs more to maintain a basic lifestyle our grandparents enjoyed.

I would say, adjusted for inflation, it would be close. It may even be cheaper now. But again, your house would be smaller, you wouldn’t have 1,000 channels, no cell phone, etc

Groceries are a lot cheaper now adjusted for inflation. I think we’ve been led to believe everything is worse now because hate and anger sells.
 
Last edited:
I would say, adjusted for inflation, it would be close. It may even be cheaper now. But again, your house would be smaller, you wouldn’t have 1,000 channels, no cell phone, etc

Groceries are a lot cheaper now adjusted for inflation. I think we’ve been led to believe everything is worse now because hate and anger sells.

Groceries may be less healthy now-Im not sure. There are more regulations in place to ensure a safe food supply but there are more processed foods that are terribly unhealthy as well. I'm not sure how that would factor into the cost of Healthcare which is certainly more expensive.

And then there is this:

FB_IMG_1733680638950.jpg
 
NJ governor signs law prohibiting book bans the hill

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) signed a law Monday prohibiting book banning in state libraries and schools.

The law says school boards and the governing boards of public libraries need to create standards for how books are removed from shelves and how complaints are addressed.


Books will not be allowed to be removed based on “the origin, background, or views of the material or of its authors,” nor can books be censored based “on a disagreement with a viewpoint, idea, or concept, or solely because an individual finds certain content offensive, unless they are restricting access to developmentally inappropriate material for certain age groups.”

The governor is also providing legal protections for librarians from civil or criminal lawsuits around book banning.

“The Freedom to Read Act cements New Jersey’s role on the forefront of preventing book bans and protecting the intellectual freedom of our educators and students. Across the nation, we have seen attempts to suppress and censor the stories and experiences of others. I’m proud to amplify the voices of our past and present, as there is no better way for our children to prepare for the future than to read freely,” Murphy said in a statement.

New Jersey is the third state to sign a law against book banning, following Minnesota and Illinois.

The move comes amid reports of increases in book bans in recent years, especially in Republican states such as Florida.

It also was signed ahead of a new Trump administration, while some advocates are worried the Department of Education could create rules on which books are allowed on school shelves.
 
Back
Top