Polds4OSU
Marshall
yes and just got one in the last few weeks that says Infidel in Arabic under his arm ...even though he leads Arabic TroopsDoes he really have that tattoo?
yes and just got one in the last few weeks that says Infidel in Arabic under his arm ...even though he leads Arabic TroopsDoes he really have that tattoo?
@JTOSUAt this point if you aren’t outraged your complicit.
Yes, he has 2 tatoos with white nationalist meanings and just got an "infidel" tatoo after becoming secretary of defense.Does he really have that tattoo?
No, I was laughing because one of the regular outrage machine consumers posted “if you aren’t outraged you are complicit”. Even after you smartly asked why other media was not covering this.@JTOSU
So based on your reaction to Vakarian, I assume you are fine with all this? Are we only pissed about it because we hate Trump and this isn't anything bad?
You claim to not like Trump, but never seem to agree to anything indicating he's ruining things and respond with a laugh to things that should cause very different reactions. Or is it the nervous laugh while thinking "we're effed"?
Isn't that DEI. Forced diversity in hiring based on something that shouldn't effect worthiness of the job.A Newsmax host advocated for university professors being required to list if they're Republicans or Democrats: “Until these universities get a balance, you know, something's got to be done. It might be a price to pay.”
And this is why Trump somehow still has a strong backing no matter how horrible he is.This is the current Republican party. They want a dictator with zero dissent.
They also have zero use for the Constitution.
Read the replies to the X post. They are nuts.
I think this concept can be applied across a wide variety of things. We didn't used to have X, why do we now? Because technology can now identify X where existing tech at the time could not. It's quite sad that such a simple thing is seemingly so far above many people's realm of understanding.From WSJ
View attachment 11018
RFK Jr doesn’t understand epidemiology. The reason for the increase in prevalence is because we’ve gotten much better at recognizing autism spectrum disorders. Here’s a for instance:
When I was in pharmacy school in the 80s the diagnostic criteria for diabetes was a fasting blood sugar of 200 or higher. Now the criteria is a fasting blood sugar of 126 or higher. Simply put, more people are going to meet the criteria with the lower number, the lower number is more sensitive. If you make the diagnostic criteria more sensitive then the prevalence increases because you diagnose more people.
This is what happened with ASD. All the Facebook posts “we didn’t have all this autism when I was in grade school” wasn’t because it didn’t exist, it was because we were unable to diagnose it. Our diagnostic criteria are much more sensitive in 2025 than they were in 1975 and thus the prevalence has increased. It’s not an epidemic, we are just better at diagnosing it and thus the prevalence has increased. If RFK Jr had a second year pharmacy or med student understanding of epidemiology he would know this. This isn’t a difficult concept.
I think this concept can be applied across a wide variety of things. We didn't used to have X, why do we now? Because technology can now identify X where existing tech at the time could not. It's quite sad that such a simple thing is seemingly so far above many people's realm of understanding.
We didn’t use seat belts. But a lot of people got closed head injuries.It applies to lots of things. Back in my day we all played with fire and turned out ok. This generation is just soft.
No, Janice. YOU turned out ok but not everyone did. That's why we don't let kids do that anymore.
Just like what causes gender dysphoria in children needs to be better known and prevented, so does autism.From WSJ
View attachment 11018
RFK Jr doesn’t understand epidemiology. The reason for the increase in prevalence is because we’ve gotten much better at recognizing autism spectrum disorders. Here’s a for instance:
When I was in pharmacy school in the 80s the diagnostic criteria for diabetes was a fasting blood sugar of 200 or higher. Now the criteria is a fasting blood sugar of 126 or higher. Simply put, more people are going to meet the criteria with the lower number, the lower number is more sensitive. If you make the diagnostic criteria more sensitive then the prevalence increases because you diagnose more people.
This is what happened with ASD. All the Facebook posts “we didn’t have all this autism when I was in grade school” wasn’t because it didn’t exist, it was because we were unable to diagnose it. Our diagnostic criteria are much more sensitive in 2025 than they were in 1975 and thus the prevalence has increased. It’s not an epidemic, we are just better at diagnosing it and thus the prevalence has increased. If RFK Jr had a second year pharmacy or med student understanding of epidemiology he would know this. This isn’t a difficult concept.
Government by Art Briles pass defense. They can't throw a flag for PI on every single pass so do it on every pass.I think it will be, but there is so much illegal and immoral things going on, its hard for anything to get into and stay in the news.
There has to be consequences for this.
It literally won't matter, and that's by design. People on this board will defend it. Or say "we have to wait til all the facts come out", which they never will because the news will be on to the next insane thing. Or they will never see it.Holy ever loving sh!t. How is this not all over the news on every channel?