Trump 47

Trump to attend Saudi Wealth Fund meeting today - The Saudi Government backed investment arm will hold a meeting in Miami area today.​


President Donald Trump is expected to speak Wednesday at a meeting in the Miami area of business executives hosted by Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund. Trump is seeking to bolster investments from Saudi Arabia in the United States while at the same time trying to manage fallout from his call to displace Palestinians from the Gaza Strip as part of a U.S.-led rebuilding effort, a proposal that Saudi Arabia has condemned. Later Wednesday, Trump plans to sign more executive orders while returning to Washington on Air Force One, according to the White House.
 

So your not a wasteful Govt employee if you voted for Trump??? WTAF!!??​

MAGA actor begs Trump to save 'good' Trump-supporting federal workers caught in purge​


A Trump-supporting actor begged the president to hold back a little on tech billionaire Elon Musk's mass firings from the civil service, and at least spare the government workers who voted for him, The Independent flagged Tuesday.

Zachary Levi, who had the lead role in the acclaimed superhero film "Shazam!" and was the voice of Flynn Rider in Disney's "Tangled," made the comments this week in an interview with Fox News' Jesse Watters, saying that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency initiative is "complicated" and causing a lot of uncertainty for people who don't deserve it.


“Like there are a lot of people that are very afraid right now because there are truly good working people that work for the government, that are getting lost in the cracks,” said Levi. “And we have got to do something about that.”

“Please — Elon and all of your team and whatever needs to happen — please don’t let everybody fall through the cracks as we are doing what is necessary, which is to get in there and to like cut a cancer out, man,” he continued. “You know, sometimes they go in for cancer surgeries, doctors, and you lose some good healthy tissue along in that. They don’t want to do that, but it’s a part of like extracting that darkness out of there. And right now that’s what’s happening. But there are good people, people that voted for Donald Trump who are losing their job. And we got to make sure that we don’t leave those folks behind.”


Levi faced immediate criticism for the insinuation that only Trump voters deserve to be protected from the purge, and later walked this back in a social media post, saying, “I wasn’t pleading exclusively for Trump voters to keep their jobs. I was making a case for all Americans being lost in the shuffle, which you would understand if you listened to my earlier responses. I’m not fighting just for conservatives or MAGA or any other group of people, other than Americans. All of them.”
 
[td]

A Convenient Story

[td]
Elon Musk looks down while speaking from the Oval Office
[td]
(Aaron Schwartz / CNP / Bloomberg/ Getty)
[/td]​
[/td]
[/td]
View in browser
Last week, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene called the national debt “one of the biggest betrayals against the American people,” suggesting that Americans’ anger about debt “gave birth to the concept of DOGE.” The idea that Elon Musk and his band of government-efficiency crusaders can bring down the debt is a tidy one. But DOGE’s current plans would hardly put a dent in the deficit.
Musk has lamented that America is “drowning” in debt, which has indeed ballooned over the past decade: As of this month, the federal debt is $36 trillion, about $13 trillion higher than it was five years ago. Debt has not been a priority of either major political party for some time, my colleague Annie Lowrey, who covers economics, told me. And despite Taylor Greene’s claims about American anger over the debt, it’s not a top-of-mind issue for people at the polls, either, Annie argued.
If Musk’s team were serious about reducing the deficit, it could explore some unpopular but effective options: reduce spending for the military and the entitlement programs that make up the bulk of the federal budget—Medicare and Social Security—or simply raise taxes, Annie suggested. Instead, what Musk and DOGE have done thus far is ravage government agencies and departments (USAID, for example, which makes up a tiny portion of the budget, and the destruction of which won’t lead to major savings). They’ve also focused on slashing the federal workforce by offering buyouts to 2 million federal workers (and, over the weekend, axing thousands more federal-agency employees); so far, salaries for the workers who have accepted the buyout offer make up a minuscule portion of the national budget in total.
Musk, Trump, and their allies have also turned to a bit of magical thinking, claiming that rooting out fraud in the government is the key to saving money. In a meandering address from the Oval Office last week, Musk claimed without evidence that USAID workers were raking in millions in kickbacks, and that people as old as 150 were claiming Social Security benefits. He wrote on X last week that “at this point, I am 100% certain that the magnitude of the fraud in federal entitlements (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, Disability, etc) exceeds the combined sum of every private scam you’ve ever heard by FAR.”
Stumbling upon, and reclaiming, trillions of fraudulently spent funds would be rather convenient, and crying “fraud” is a useful way for Musk and his defenders to cast DOGE’s actions as in service of the American people. Trump has touted this same shaky logic, asserting that uncovering a bunch of fraud could mean America has less debt than previously thought. Fraud does exist in parts of the government: Some people intend to defraud government programs; others accidentally sign up for benefits they’re not actually eligible for. And the government does sometimes make payment errors—federal agencies estimated that more than $200 billion was lost in fiscal year 2023 because of such mistakes, and in past years fraud losses accounted for 3 to 7 percent of the budget. But there is no evidence that lowering the deficit is as simple as tamping down on fraud—or that fraud exists to the extent Musk claims.
Plus, by whacking the bureaucracy, Musk and his team are weakening programs that are already working to tamp down fraud. All federal programs have fraud-detection mandates. The Treasury, for example, announced in October that it had recovered or prevented $4 billion in fraud losses in the prior fiscal year, in part from employing AI machine-learning. And as he rails against what he calls fraud, Musk and his associates have effectively shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, whose mandate is to crack down on fraud in businesses (and which might have regulated Musk’s own companies).
The rhetorical trick of politicians referring to unpopular or disliked government spending as fraud isn’t new. But in an era of rampant scamming, claiming that the American government is swindling its own people hits on a salient national fear. Musk’s first few weeks running DOGE don’t bode well for his ability to solve the debt crisis. He may succeed, however, in further eroding trust in government, which could give him and his team even more leeway in their attempts to dismantle it.
 

The Trump administration has promised to prioritize the “worst first” when it comes to arrests and deportation. New ICE data shows 41% of detainees in the first 2 weeks of Feb had NO criminal records​


The Trump administration has promised to prioritize the “worst first” when it comes to arrests and deportations, but the number of detainees in Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody without a criminal conviction or pending criminal charges increased by more than 1,800 in the first two weeks of February, representing 41% of the 4,422 total new detainees in that period, according to new data obtained by NBC News.

During federal fiscal year 2024, the Biden administration made 113,431 immigration arrests, and of those, only 28% were of people who had no criminal convictions or pending criminal charges.

Asked for comment on the data, Tricia McLaughlin, a Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman, said immigrants without criminal records are often “far from innocent” but declined to provide further data.

The new detention data from ICE, which is a snapshot from late last week, shows that its detention centers are at the upper limits of their capacity. The number of people detained went from 39,238 in early February to 41,169 in mid-February. ICE’s detention capacity nationwide is 41,500. It’s unclear how many people who had been in detention were deported or were released through the Alternatives to Detention monitoring program during these two weeks.


NBC News previously reported that President Donald Trump was frustrated by the slow pace of immigrant arrests and deportations, and that two top ICE officials were demoted in response.

One factor in the pace has been the lack of detention space in ICE facilities. And the new data paints a much clearer picture of the dilemma that administration officials face as they try to clear out existing detainees to make room for more new arrestees.

According to the data, only 13% of those currently in ICE detention are on track for “expedited removal,” a designation indicating they can be deported without having a court hearing. The remaining 87% are facing deportation proceedings which could last for months or even years.

Immigration courts are facing a backlog of 3.6 million cases and, as a result, some pending cases may not be heard for years. At least 16,000 current ICE detainees have notices to appear in court, which means they are waiting for a court date.


To relieve space, the administration is now using new detention locations in Texas and Kentucky. It is also seeking to expand detention capacity available to its Denver field office, which includes Colorado and Wyoming, by at least 900 beds, according to new public documents.

The Trump administration has also begun transferring immigration detainees to Guantanamo Bay, where it eventually plans to hold as many as 30,000 people. It has already brought 112 detainees there, and more flights are in the works.

The total number of detainees with criminal convictions or pending criminal charges arrested by ICE and currently in detention did rise over the last two weeks, going up 18% in the last two weeks, from about 14,000 to more than 16,500.

The administration’s public messaging continues to center around alleged criminality. ICE’s page on X highlights the arrests of people it says have been convicted of murder, domestic violence, manslaughter, theft, child pornography and other crimes.


Detainee demographics

The new detainees are overwhelmingly male, a consistent trend. Just 22 female detainees were booked over the last two weeks, according to the data: 11 with criminal convictions or charges, and 11 without.

Available data on total ICE arrests during the Trump administration is less precise. ICE had been posting daily arrest totals to X in the early days of the Trump's second term, but that effort stopped Feb. 1. It’s unclear if the average number of arrests per day is still surpassing the Biden administration’s average of 282 in September 2024, the most recent month from which data is available.

A dashboard that ICE launched in December 2023 that summarized arrests, deportation and detention data has not been updated since September 2024.

The federal government has also stopped tracking the number of transgender people in ICE detention, which was a part of its previous data collection efforts. Data from mid-January showed 47 transgender detainees in ICE facilities.
 

The Trump administration has promised to prioritize the “worst first” when it comes to arrests and deportation. New ICE data shows 41% of detainees in the first 2 weeks of Feb had NO criminal records​


The Trump administration has promised to prioritize the “worst first” when it comes to arrests and deportations, but the number of detainees in Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody without a criminal conviction or pending criminal charges increased by more than 1,800 in the first two weeks of February, representing 41% of the 4,422 total new detainees in that period, according to new data obtained by NBC News.

During federal fiscal year 2024, the Biden administration made 113,431 immigration arrests, and of those, only 28% were of people who had no criminal convictions or pending criminal charges.

Asked for comment on the data, Tricia McLaughlin, a Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman, said immigrants without criminal records are often “far from innocent” but declined to provide further data.

The new detention data from ICE, which is a snapshot from late last week, shows that its detention centers are at the upper limits of their capacity. The number of people detained went from 39,238 in early February to 41,169 in mid-February. ICE’s detention capacity nationwide is 41,500. It’s unclear how many people who had been in detention were deported or were released through the Alternatives to Detention monitoring program during these two weeks.


NBC News previously reported that President Donald Trump was frustrated by the slow pace of immigrant arrests and deportations, and that two top ICE officials were demoted in response.

One factor in the pace has been the lack of detention space in ICE facilities. And the new data paints a much clearer picture of the dilemma that administration officials face as they try to clear out existing detainees to make room for more new arrestees.

According to the data, only 13% of those currently in ICE detention are on track for “expedited removal,” a designation indicating they can be deported without having a court hearing. The remaining 87% are facing deportation proceedings which could last for months or even years.

Immigration courts are facing a backlog of 3.6 million cases and, as a result, some pending cases may not be heard for years. At least 16,000 current ICE detainees have notices to appear in court, which means they are waiting for a court date.


To relieve space, the administration is now using new detention locations in Texas and Kentucky. It is also seeking to expand detention capacity available to its Denver field office, which includes Colorado and Wyoming, by at least 900 beds, according to new public documents.

The Trump administration has also begun transferring immigration detainees to Guantanamo Bay, where it eventually plans to hold as many as 30,000 people. It has already brought 112 detainees there, and more flights are in the works.

The total number of detainees with criminal convictions or pending criminal charges arrested by ICE and currently in detention did rise over the last two weeks, going up 18% in the last two weeks, from about 14,000 to more than 16,500.

The administration’s public messaging continues to center around alleged criminality. ICE’s page on X highlights the arrests of people it says have been convicted of murder, domestic violence, manslaughter, theft, child pornography and other crimes.


Detainee demographics

The new detainees are overwhelmingly male, a consistent trend. Just 22 female detainees were booked over the last two weeks, according to the data: 11 with criminal convictions or charges, and 11 without.

Available data on total ICE arrests during the Trump administration is less precise. ICE had been posting daily arrest totals to X in the early days of the Trump's second term, but that effort stopped Feb. 1. It’s unclear if the average number of arrests per day is still surpassing the Biden administration’s average of 282 in September 2024, the most recent month from which data is available.

A dashboard that ICE launched in December 2023 that summarized arrests, deportation and detention data has not been updated since September 2024.

The federal government has also stopped tracking the number of transgender people in ICE detention, which was a part of its previous data collection efforts. Data from mid-January showed 47 transgender detainees in ICE facilities.
so he lied??!!??!! GASP...
 
Not sure what to expect here, or what they are trying to rile people up about.

Take away about 2.4 Million of those accounts, because they are in DOD. Each military (and possibly civilian) member (active and reserve) has a gov travel card (credit card). Valid expenses are paid off by the DOD, but each member is responsible for it, it has to get turned on for each trip, and any use that isn't allowed get flagged and isn't reimbursed. On top of that, every command would have command credit cards to use for official expenses.

I'd imagine any dept/agency that travels a lot would use similar approaches.

Do you see that as a problem?
That explains the number of cards. That was blowing my mind. Thanks for that. This wasn't a Elon Tweet to enrage people. It was a government department tweet giving information. The number of cards issued was blowing my mind.
 
There is LITERALLY ZERO probelm with this. This IS HOW the Govt works for ALL purchases under $10,000 for Goods or Services. They are done via something called a P-Card or Purchase Card and the US Govt has been using these for at LEAST the last 27 Years that I have been in the Private Sector selling stuff to the US Govt.

IN fact it was all started in 1982 via Executive Order By Reagan
View attachment 9810

They are Very limited to be given out and you have to FIND the person with the P-Card that has authorized the purchase to go chase down the Payment (This can be a huge Pain)

They are treated like gold because it is the only way the Govt Entity can buy anything

And I've been told by NUMEROUS entities I've sold to that tell me the P - Cards to purchase goods and services for a office, branch, new construction etc etc etc are extremely hard to get one issued to a person and that is why they are rare and they are HEAVILY audited EVERY year.

They are required to fill out paperwork before the purchase is authorized and get the purchase Approved,.

Then that paper and that exact transaction and what is going to be purchased is submitted from that form to a Controller

That Controller then goes through all the other Govt Purchases by that dept in that location and surrounding locations and ensures there are no other duplicate requests for the same material being purchased as well ( and if there is, then you have to go into a WHOLE thing to PROVE the orders with the same materials are for different Jobs or Needs)

Once the Controller is satisfied the purchase is legit they will green light the Purchase and the Form

Then the person can place the Order and they will pay with a P-Card and they must collect and save every single reciept and submit it to match it up with the Preapproved paperwork that was approved before the purchase.

IF the receipt and the Pre approval differ by more than $10. The payment will be canceled and stopped (Have had this happen about 40 times because of Unexpected Freight Cost weren't included in the original Quote). Then had to start the whole process over.

All in all this entire process takes upwards of 4-6 months to do. PRIOR to P-Cards the Govt worked with issuing WRITTEN PO #'s..and this process would take ~ 1 year

Here is step by step guide of how the Govt uses them to purchase Goods and Services for Offices Etc



and in 2008 the GSA implemented Smart 2 Pay software that Monitors all of the P-Card purchases of the Govt and uses an AI like Algorithm to track and Monitor over 100 MILLION P-Card Transactions per Year and it has the ability and authority to lock a card and reject Payments it doesn't like.

for example

Transactions that might raise red flags include purchases made on the weekend or at locations far from an employee's home base, or sales from unusual vendors such as jewelers, liquor stores, sports-ticket outlets or classic car parts dealers. Of course, a human still has to check out specific transactions — for instance, that liquor store purchase might have been a military chaplain buying sacramental wine.

And let me tell you. I spent 17 months Chasing a Payment from a P-Card Holder on a Sale where we had already shipped the Goods, but this Damn computer system flagged it as Suspicious and canceled the Payment and it became the bane of my existence for almost 2 years trying to get it authorized, unblocked and get the funds paid out.

Thanks for the info. This is why I put the question out here. Figured someone would know what was going on and why so many cards.
 
That explains the number of cards. That was blowing my mind. Thanks for that. This wasn't a Elon Tweet to enrage people. It was a government department tweet giving information. The number of cards issued was blowing my mind.
Elon is DOGE and DOGE is Elon.

It was an Elon tweet to enrage folks.
 

'No such power': Judge blocks Trump's 'unlawful' attempt to fire Biden-appointed member of civil service board​


A federal judge on Tuesday reinstated, for now at least, a member of the Merit Systems Protection Board after she sued to regain her position following her removal by President Donald Trump.

On Feb. 10, the 45th and 47th president sent Cathy Harris packing without an explanation. This would-be firing, however, came with a conclusive termination letter that did not offer an explanation.


Under federal law, members of the MSPB are appointees who serve from their appointment until the end of their term unless they are removed “for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.”

In a 21-page memorandum opinion and order, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras, a Barack Obama appointee, determined that the statute’s three firing mechanisms simply do not cover “differences of political opinion.” Moreover, the court ruled, the federal worker board must maintain a certain level of independence from politics.


At a basic level, the judge credits the words of the originating statute, the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA), as fully controlling when it comes to determining how membership on the MSPB pans out.

“Any member may be removed by the President only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office,” Contreras recites the statute.


In order to determine the extent of what this phrase in the statute means, however, the judge turns to case law.

Here, the removal language in question falls under the purview of a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court case that keeps quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial agencies largely insulated from the whims of the president.

“Because the MSPB falls within the scope of [the high court case], Congress has the power to specify that members of the MSPB may serve for a term of years, with the President empowered to remove those members only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office,” the court’s order reads. “The President did not indicate that any of these reasons drove his decision to terminate Harris. The Court thus concludes that Harris has demonstrated that she is likely to show her termination as a member of the MSPB was unlawful.”


The work of the MSPB itself is integral to how the court views the removal language in light of precedent.

The court helpfully sums the agency up:


“In enacting the CSRA, Congress exercised its power to regulate the civil service,” the order goes on. “It defined certain prohibited personnel practices, to include discrimination, loyalty oaths, coercion to engage in political activity, and retaliation against whistleblowers.”
Any bets on if she gets re-fired in a few months with a new letter claiming inefficiency or neglect of duty?
 


[td]

A Convenient Story





[td]
Elon Musk looks down while speaking from the Oval Office







[td]
(Aaron Schwartz / CNP / Bloomberg/ Getty)

[/td]​

[/td]


[/td]




View in browser
Last week, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene called the national debt “one of the biggest betrayals against the American people,” suggesting that Americans’ anger about debt “gave birth to the concept of DOGE.” The idea that Elon Musk and his band of government-efficiency crusaders can bring down the debt is a tidy one. But DOGE’s current plans would hardly put a dent in the deficit.
Musk has lamented that America is “drowning” in debt, which has indeed ballooned over the past decade: As of this month, the federal debt is $36 trillion, about $13 trillion higher than it was five years ago. Debt has not been a priority of either major political party for some time, my colleague Annie Lowrey, who covers economics, told me. And despite Taylor Greene’s claims about American anger over the debt, it’s not a top-of-mind issue for people at the polls, either, Annie argued.
If Musk’s team were serious about reducing the deficit, it could explore some unpopular but effective options: reduce spending for the military and the entitlement programs that make up the bulk of the federal budget—Medicare and Social Security—or simply raise taxes, Annie suggested. Instead, what Musk and DOGE have done thus far is ravage government agencies and departments (USAID, for example, which makes up a tiny portion of the budget, and the destruction of which won’t lead to major savings). They’ve also focused on slashing the federal workforce by offering buyouts to 2 million federal workers (and, over the weekend, axing thousands more federal-agency employees); so far, salaries for the workers who have accepted the buyout offer make up a minuscule portion of the national budget in total.
Musk, Trump, and their allies have also turned to a bit of magical thinking, claiming that rooting out fraud in the government is the key to saving money. In a meandering address from the Oval Office last week, Musk claimed without evidence that USAID workers were raking in millions in kickbacks, and that people as old as 150 were claiming Social Security benefits. He wrote on X last week that “at this point, I am 100% certain that the magnitude of the fraud in federal entitlements (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, Disability, etc) exceeds the combined sum of every private scam you’ve ever heard by FAR.”
Stumbling upon, and reclaiming, trillions of fraudulently spent funds would be rather convenient, and crying “fraud” is a useful way for Musk and his defenders to cast DOGE’s actions as in service of the American people. Trump has touted this same shaky logic, asserting that uncovering a bunch of fraud could mean America has less debt than previously thought. Fraud does exist in parts of the government: Some people intend to defraud government programs; others accidentally sign up for benefits they’re not actually eligible for. And the government does sometimes make payment errors—federal agencies estimated that more than $200 billion was lost in fiscal year 2023 because of such mistakes, and in past years fraud losses accounted for 3 to 7 percent of the budget. But there is no evidence that lowering the deficit is as simple as tamping down on fraud—or that fraud exists to the extent Musk claims.
Plus, by whacking the bureaucracy, Musk and his team are weakening programs that are already working to tamp down fraud. All federal programs have fraud-detection mandates. The Treasury, for example, announced in October that it had recovered or prevented $4 billion in fraud losses in the prior fiscal year, in part from employing AI machine-learning. And as he rails against what he calls fraud, Musk and his associates have effectively shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, whose mandate is to crack down on fraud in businesses (and which might have regulated Musk’s own companies).
The rhetorical trick of politicians referring to unpopular or disliked government spending as fraud isn’t new. But in an era of rampant scamming, claiming that the American government is swindling its own people hits on a salient national fear. Musk’s first few weeks running DOGE don’t bode well for his ability to solve the debt crisis. He may succeed, however, in further eroding trust in government, which could give him and his team even more leeway in their attempts to dismantle it.


I read this then look at polling for DOGE. The number of people that support the cuts and getting the budget under control is almost a 2 to 1 margin. Getting spending under control is obviously a much higher polling priority than is being shown with current polling methods. Maybe this shit show will get congress to act. It's the only way the budget gets fixed.
 

Eric Adams' Lawyers Offered Trump DOJ an ‘Ever-Present Partner'​


Eric Adams and his lawyers insist there was no deal. In no universe, they've said repeatedly, did the Justice Department agree to drop the bribery case against the Mayor of New York City in return for his cooperation on the Trump administration's deportation agenda.

But on Feb 3., in a letter that received little public scrutiny, two of Adams' lawyers explicitly asked Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove to make the mayor's charges go away so he could help Donald Trump on immigration.


"As his trial grows near, it will be untenable for the Mayor to be the ever-present partner that DHS [the Department of Homeland Security] needs to make New York City as safe as possible," Alex Spiro and Bill Burck wrote in a letter to Bove, memorializing their meeting of January 31 and advocating "strongly in favor of dismissal."

A week later, Bove gave the lawyers exactly what they wanted - a request for dismissal - using their very same logic: that Adams had to "devote" himself to fighting "illegal immigration." But Adams still isn't able to be that omnipresent partner to the feds, and may never be.

The Trump administration's top immigration enforcer treated Adams like a half-competent intern on national television, and told him he expected more compliance. Eight Justice Department officials quit over what they saw as a corrupt deal. The Department's reputation for independence - for sometimes bucking the president's priorities, for keeping politics largely out of prosecutions - has been kicked in the gut. And Adams still isn't off the hook; the Deputy Attorney General made sure that charges against Adams can be brought up again after the November mayoral election. The judge in his case hasn't yet agreed to actually dismiss the case, and has ordered Adams and his lawyers to be in court at 2 p.m. Wednesday.



For months, the mayor and his team did everything they could to reach this moment. Adams went down to Mar-a-Lago and to Donald Trump's inauguration. The mayor met up with Trump at an Ultimate Fighting Championship event, and told his staff not to criticize the new president in public. It was all so over-the-top, Trump and his team laughed at the "thirsty" mayor. Adams eventually got a deal from Trump, but it's clear his strategy has backfired spectacularly.

"New Yorkers know exactly what this is. And I think a lot of people were willing to give the mayor grace until he bent the knee," Crystal Hudson, a New York City Council Member from Adams' home borough of Brooklyn tells me. "They're willing to let him, you know, go to the boxing match, or MMA, or whatever it was. But once he went all in, people were like, ‘Oh, nah, nah. We're not having it.'"


In their letter, Spiro and Burck made light of what they saw as a relatively thin case against their client. But they focused largely on the political and policy implications of a mayor facing five felony counts.

"We wanted to address questions you have raised with respect to the indictment's impact on Mayor Adams's ability to lead New York City, including by working with the federal government on important issues of immigration enforcement," they wrote in the letter to Bove.

Adams wanted to be helpful to the Trump administration as it "seeks to aggressively enforce immigration laws and remove undocumented immigrants," they continued. But "Mayor Adams's political muscle is weakened by an indictment."

"Leaders of various city agencies such as the NYPD," the lawyers went on, "serve at the Mayor's pleasure and are subject to removal by him. Yet, to the extent that city officials perceive the Mayor to be politically weakened, on the ropes, or not long for the office, he loses some ability to make sure officials and their agencies are complying."


It's worth noting that the NYPD is strictly prohibited from working with federal authorities on civil immigration matters. And if it was Adams' political juice the attorneys were looking to refill, the exact opposite has happened.

The lawyers didn't respond to a request for comment. But in a separate letter to the judge in the case, Spiro and Burck are adamant that this is all above board. "We told the Department that ending the case would lift a legal and practical burden that impeded Mayor Adams in his official duties," they write. "We never said or suggested to anyone that Mayor Adams would do X in exchange for Y."

By announcing the deal on the same day they paused foreign bribery prosecutions, Trump Justice Department officials made it look like they were functionally decriminalizing corruption. By choosing to investigate the line prosecutors who led the case against Adams, those officials made it look like the case was practically a pretext for seizing control of the Justice Department's Southern District of New York - its most autonomous office, the so-called "sovereign district." By dismissing Adams' case only temporarily, they made it seem like they were forcing the mayor into subservience.


The Rev. Al Sharpton - who has known Adams since the then-cop was the activist's bodyguard - expressed his disgust with the arrangement. ("They're talking to New Yorkers as if we have no sense of a game being played, when we have the ability to spot one before it even starts," he said last week.) Sharpton was one of a number of local political leaders who met with New York Governor Kathy Hochul on Tuesday, as she considers removing the mayor from office.

Eric Adams, who once proclaimed himself the future of the Democratic Party, is on political life support. His administration, long teetering on a chaotic edge, has been pushed further into dysfunction with the resignations of the four deputy mayors who ran much of the city bureaucracy day-to-day. His bet to cozy up to Trump appears to have been a bust. The mayor's joint TV appearance with Trump "border czar" and former U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement chief Tom Homan only made matters worse. He warned Adams that he would be "up his butt" if he wasn't sufficiently helpful to Homan's deportation push.


"This is a time when the City of New York needs a guardian at the gate, right? And instead, what we have is a mayor who's rolling out the red carpet and rose petals for the ICE cowboy," says Justin Brannan, who represents Coney Island on the City Council and is running for city comptroller.

"The challenge with Trump's whole chaos and cruelty theater is that people who aren't even necessarily targeted are also scared to death," he continues. ‘It has such a chilling effect on communities - even folks that are here legally … And that's the whole point. So to have the Mayor of the City of New York doing anything but standing up against that is very depressing - and disqualifying."

Some political observers ask what Adams was supposed to do instead. There was no way for him to govern, much less run for reelection, while facing his April trial. This is one of the arguments the mayor's lawyers used in their letter to Bove. "Conservatively, Mayor Adams will be spending 75 percent of his waking hours preparing for or on trial," they wrote. At least this way, the argument goes, he stays out of jail.


But those same lawyers echoed sentiments common throughout the New York legal community that the case against him was riddled with "legal and factual weaknesses." (Although the acting Southern District chief did say she was preparing a superseding indictment that included an obstruction of justice charge.) Still, there's a chance Adams could've beaten the rap - or successfully cast himself as the victim of a justice system out of control - and endeared himself to just enough New Yorkers to win reelection. Donald Trump was indicted over and over again on felony charges, and it only drove his poll numbers up.

Adams has brought down crime as promised, and helped the city rebound from Covid. There's a record to run on, if an uneven one. Even now, there are still Adams supporters, like A.T. Mitchell-Mann, who Adams named in 2022 as the co-chair of his gun violence prevention task force. "He is unfairly being targeted. And I don't like the fact that he's undergoing so much of this consistent scrutiny," he tells me. "Like, you can't win to save his life."


Adams himself has been one step ahead of investigators for years. In 2010, as chairman of the state Senate's wagering committee, he "demanded" a particular gambling company get a license to operate a slot parlor in Queens. He celebrated with company executives when they won the bid - and then he gave less-than-candid testimony when asked about the deal, according to a state inspector general report. In 2014, the city's Department of Investigation found his One Brooklyn Fund nonprofit, meant to help local residents, failed to comply with local conflict-of-interest rules. From 2015 to 2019, real estate developers and lobbyists looking for favors from Adams contributed hundreds of thousands to the fund.

By 2021, his many trips to Turkey and China and his questionable fundraising tactics were known. "You've been investigated for corruption everywhere you've gone," mayoral candidate Andrew Yang said to Adams at one debate. Years later, the trips to - and donations from - Turkey would form the basis of the bribery and corruption case against him.


Instead, Adams' lawyers chose another path, one that has backfired in the worst possible way for him. And the craziest part is, they saw it all coming. "As Mayor Adams continues to help with DHS' ramping enforcement operations, the risk that his political opponents - and in particular, the City Council - will try to remove him from power will only increase," they wrote to Bove. "Governor Hochul also could conclude that, at a certain point, the Mayor can no longer devote the attention that his position requires and accordingly take steps to remove him."

A little more than two weeks later, she was very publicly contemplating doing exactly that.

Link to the Article
 

Republican House Member questions citizenship status of Latino county elected official at public meeting​

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., questioned the citizenship status of an elected county official in New York during a discussion about Immigration and Customs Enforcement at a public meeting Tuesday.

The remark by Lawler came after José Alvarado, the vice chair of Westchester County’s Board of Legislators, asked the congressman what documentation people should be expected to produce if they are stopped by ICE.


“I’m speaking to you, Mr. Lawler — somebody that looks like me, right, is approached by ICE. What would your immediate expectation would be for me to do? What should I carry on me to demonstrate that this immigrant is the vice chairman of this board?” Alvarado, a Democrat, asked.

Lawler said he should cooperate if that were to happen, before suggesting Alvarado might not be a citizen.

“Well, like every other person that is engaged by law enforcement, if you are asked for information, cooperate. I wouldn’t expect you as a — I don’t know. I assume you’re a citizen. Maybe you’re not. Maybe you are,” Lawler said during the board's weekly meeting.

Some attendees laughed, while one person could be heard calling Lawler's comments “unbelievable,” to which Lawler responded, “Well, you’re telling me about ICE approaching you.”

Alvarado then told Lawler that he was in fact a citizen, and that he would not be able to serve in his elected position on the board if he weren't.


“I didn’t realize that you didn’t know that in order to be elected you have to be a citizen," Alvarado said. "In order to vote you have to be a citizen.”

A few minutes later, Lawler said his point was that Alvarado, like anyone who might be approached by ICE, should provide the documentation officers asked of them.

“Back to your previous comment. Yes, I understand, obviously, to vote you have to be a citizen. Yes, I understand to hold office you have to be a citizen. Your question was specific to what papers you should show as an immigrant. My point to you was, like everyone else who is a citizen, if you are encountered by law enforcement and they ask you for documentation, you provide it. That’s it,” Lawler said.

ICE and President Donald Trump’s border czar Tom Homan are making a push for an immigration crackdown in New York. Earlier this month, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced a Justice Department lawsuit against New York and several of its leaders over the state’s immigration policies.


A spokesperson for Lawler defended the congressman’s remarks in an email.

“Congressman Lawler was simply making the point that people in this country, legally and obeying the law, have nothing to fear from ICE,” Nate Soule said. “The reality is that Democrats can’t win this argument on the merits, so all they have left is character assassination and lies. The Democrats’ defense of sanctuary city, county, and state policies was roundly rejected in the last election — including by the Hispanic community, who overwhelmingly moved toward Republicans.”

Alvarado's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday night.

In 2001, Alvarado became Westchester County’s first Latino legislator. He has served on the Board of Legislators for eight non-consecutive terms and was elected to serve as vice chairman in January 2024, according to the board’s website.

Lawler has represented New York's 17th Congressional District since 2023. He won re-election last year, beating Democratic opponent Mondaire Jones by more than 6 percentage points.
 
Of all the immigration stuff Trump has done this is the one to me that is completely crazy. These people should have be given refugee status which is what TPS is leading to. A large part of the political upheaval and persecution they are facing is our fault. Not to mention they are mostly educated and skilled workers who can make a solid contribution. But yeah lets send em back to a place there is a real chance they get tossed in a cell to die for the crime of opposing the Maduro.

 
Of all the immigration stuff Trump has done this is the one to me that is completely crazy. These people should have be given refugee status which is what TPS is leading to. A large part of the political upheaval and persecution they are facing is our fault. Not to mention they are mostly educated and skilled workers who can make a solid contribution. But yeah lets send em back to a place there is a real chance they get tossed in a cell to die for the crime of opposing the Maduro.

Trump LITERALLY ran an entire section of his campaign promising to End LEGAL Refugee Status for Haitian Refugees in Ohio who had been given legal status. Revoke their Legal Status and Deport them.....Accused them of eating Pets and Demonized them in the Media for Months.

Even had Trump Supporters so riled up they were driving to Springfield to try to Prove they were eating the pets Etc.

and you think he would even consider ANY new Refugee Status ?
 
I read this then look at polling for DOGE. The number of people that support the cuts and getting the budget under control is almost a 2 to 1 margin. Getting spending under control is obviously a much higher polling priority than is being shown with current polling methods. Maybe this shit show will get congress to act. It's the only way the budget gets fixed.
I´m all for getting budget ´under control´ (whatever that means - ha), however, I do not trust who is in charge...any millionaire/billionaire worth their weight does not give a ratś @$$ about the average working class people...I wonder how many ´working class´ people will end up losing their jobs vs people at the top?! It is a normal cycle that is America...the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, and the middle class pretty much stays the same; but actually goes further down little by little...doge will end up patting themselves on the back for a job well done, but we will not see any actual change in the economy and/or our paychecks/taxes/spending, and musk and his elite/rich friends will make another small fortune off of their ´work´... why not go after Congress and Supreme Court?? and while we´re at it, go after the mill/billionaires?? NOPE, we will just remove average people from their jobs, cut funding to people who really need help, and a bunch of poor to middle class will get all excited cuz ´their party´ cut the fat...
god, I just read back what I wrote...how depressing...I´m gonna go put more bourbon in my coffee...have a great day!
 

NY Times reporting one Deported migrant has tried to commit suicide at the Hotel. Also reporting that many of the deported Migrants have had their Passports and Phones confiscated and taken away from them​



Migrants deported from US hold up hand written signs pleading for help as they report being locked in Panama hotel​

Panama City, Panama - Panama's government denied Tuesday that migrants deported by the US who were seen holding up signs to hotel windows pleading for help were being held against their will.

Public Security Minister Frank Abrego said the migrants were not being "deprived of their freedom" while they await repatriation.

"They are in our custody for their protection," he said.

Police were seen guarding the Decapolis Hotel in Panama City, where women believed to be part of the group held up handwritten signs to journalists below saying "Please help us" and "We are not safe in our country."

According to Abrego, the group includes migrants from China, India, Iran, and Vietnam.

Those who do not go home voluntarily would be transferred to a shelter in the Darien jungle, near the border with Colombia, while the International Organization for Migration and the UN refugee agency organize their relocation to another country, Abrego said.

"We're providing them with all the necessary medical care and comforts, and we will continue to do so until the last of them leaves our country, which is what was agreed with the United States government," he added, saying Panama has complied "with all international regulations."


Deported migrants in Panama reportedly "locked in a hotel"​


The minister appeared before the press after The New York Times reported that the migrants had their passports and most of their cellphones taken from them.

They were "locked in a hotel, barred from seeing lawyers and told they would soon be sent to a makeshift camp near the Panamanian jungle," the newspaper said.


At least one person at the hotel "tried to commit suicide," according to the newspaper, which said it had spoken to several people inside who identified themselves as asylum seekers and alleged that they were detained against their will.

On his first day in office last month, President Donald Trump declared a national emergency at the Southern border and vowed to deport "millions and millions" of migrants.

During a recent Latin American tour by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Panama and Guatemala agreed to serve as a bridge for migrants of other nationalities deported by Trump's administration.

On Monday, Costa Rica also agreed to collaborate on such migrant repatriations.

 
I´m all for getting budget ´under control´ (whatever that means - ha), however, I do not trust who is in charge...any millionaire/billionaire worth their weight does not give a ratś @$$ about the average working class people...I wonder how many ´working class´ people will end up losing their jobs vs people at the top?! It is a normal cycle that is America...the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, and the middle class pretty much stays the same; but actually goes further down little by little...doge will end up patting themselves on the back for a job well done, but we will not see any actual change in the economy and/or our paychecks/taxes/spending, and musk and his elite/rich friends will make another small fortune off of their ´work´... why not go after Congress and Supreme Court?? and while we´re at it, go after the mill/billionaires?? NOPE, we will just remove average people from their jobs, cut funding to people who really need help, and a bunch of poor to middle class will get all excited cuz ´their party´ cut the fat...
god, I just read back what I wrote...how depressing...I´m gonna go put more bourbon in my coffee...have a great day!
A billionaire with a tiny touch of common sense wants a very strong and large middle and upper middle class. That is where they make their money.
 
I´m all for getting budget ´under control´ (whatever that means - ha), however, I do not trust who is in charge...any millionaire/billionaire worth their weight does not give a ratś @$$ about the average working class people...I wonder how many ´working class´ people will end up losing their jobs vs people at the top?! It is a normal cycle that is America...the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, and the middle class pretty much stays the same; but actually goes further down little by little...doge will end up patting themselves on the back for a job well done, but we will not see any actual change in the economy and/or our paychecks/taxes/spending, and musk and his elite/rich friends will make another small fortune off of their ´work´... why not go after Congress and Supreme Court?? and while we´re at it, go after the mill/billionaires?? NOPE, we will just remove average people from their jobs, cut funding to people who really need help, and a bunch of poor to middle class will get all excited cuz ´their party´ cut the fat...
god, I just read back what I wrote...how depressing...I´m gonna go put more bourbon in my coffee...have a great day!
I disagree with one thing. I think it will impact the economy. When you cut support to people in need and also lay off a bunch of people in areas often dominated by the fed gov, it can be a drag on the economy. Add to that the potential tariffs and ensuing cost spikes from a trade war, and those impacts can be exacerbated.
 
Back
Top