Trump 47

Monday (morning, no less), you say….

Time Watch GIF


Will this finally be your FAFO moment?
Mixed Martial Arts Sport GIF by UFC
 
Here is also information from APNews:
No classified material was accessed “without proper security clearances”.

Based on that information, care to edit your concern? So why again do you claim this is not legal?
Nice link to nothing.

i give you a link that says that it was classified and they did not have the clearance. You gave me nothing, not even logic.

So, what you are saying was that they had all the appropriate clearances, but went ahead and removed the director of security for no reason at all?

And, here is another link backing the claim that also has logic on its side. This media claims three sources. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...ing-elon-musks-doge-employees-acce-rcna190357





EDIT: Now I see why you did not provide the link to your "information from APNews". APNews says:
Musk’s DOGE crew lacked high enough security clearance to access that information, so the two USAID security officials — John Voorhees and deputy Brian McGill — believed themselves legally obligated to deny access.

BUT, they did quote someone from DOGE:
Kate Miller, who serves on an advisory board for DOGE, said in a separate post that no classified material was accessed “without proper security clearances.”

So, your claim that "APNews" said that was just a DOGE spokesperson making the claim. Gee, if your investigation of illegal activity begins and ends with asking the accused, there will probably never be any illegal activity. Nice try to cover the breaking of federal law that you favor because you are for party over country.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Your "missing" link- https://apnews.com/article/doge-mus...n=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter
 
Last edited:
Nice link to nothing.

i give you a link that says that it was classified and they did not have the clearance. You gave me nothing, not even logic.

So, what you are saying was that they had all the appropriate clearances, but went ahead and removed the director of security for no reason at all?

And, here is another link backing the claim that also has logic on its side. This media claims three sources. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...ing-elon-musks-doge-employees-acce-rcna190357





EDIT: Now I see why you did not provide the link to your "information from APNews". APNews says:
Musk’s DOGE crew lacked high enough security clearance to access that information, so the two USAID security officials — John Voorhees and deputy Brian McGill — believed themselves legally obligated to deny access.

BUT, they did quote someone from DOGE:
Kate Miller, who serves on an advisory board for DOGE, said in a separate post that no classified material was accessed “without proper security clearances.”

So, your claim that "APNews" said that was just a DOGE spokesperson making the claim. Gee, if your investigation of illegal activity begins and ends with asking the accused, there will probably never be any illegal activity. Nice try to cover the breaking of federal law that you favor because you are for party over country.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Your "missing" link- https://apnews.com/article/doge-mus...n=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter
Mislead, misdirect, mischaracterize.

I guess we can add deliberately deceive now.
 
Nice link to nothing.

i give you a link that says that it was classified and they did not have the clearance. You gave me nothing, not even logic.

So, what you are saying was that they had all the appropriate clearances, but went ahead and removed the director of security for no reason at all?

And, here is another link backing the claim that also has logic on its side. This media claims three sources. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...ing-elon-musks-doge-employees-acce-rcna190357





EDIT: Now I see why you did not provide the link to your "information from APNews". APNews says:
Musk’s DOGE crew lacked high enough security clearance to access that information, so the two USAID security officials — John Voorhees and deputy Brian McGill — believed themselves legally obligated to deny access.

BUT, they did quote someone from DOGE:
Kate Miller, who serves on an advisory board for DOGE, said in a separate post that no classified material was accessed “without proper security clearances.”

So, your claim that "APNews" said that was just a DOGE spokesperson making the claim. Gee, if your investigation of illegal activity begins and ends with asking the accused, there will probably never be any illegal activity. Nice try to cover the breaking of federal law that you favor because you are for party over country.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Your "missing" link- https://apnews.com/article/doge-mus...n=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter
He probably didn't/doesn't care that the orange one was storing boxes of classified (TS SCI and program level) in his bathroom and showing to visitors so why would he care about some silly old stuff that the Treasury Dept has...

Some people don't care about protecting our country.
 
The oligarchy! LOL.

Dang, when you some of you drink your media kool-aid you down it!
Dude. We've been run by oligarchy for a decade plus. Money from the ultra wealthy runs our government. Has at least since citizens united and is only getting stronger.
 


Dumb question here. Are any of his contracts going to be canceled..?
Wonder how many companies are going to sue over breach of contract and cost the gov even more due to legal fees.
DOGE has ZERO authority to cancel spending appropriated by Congress. Remember Congress sets all the spending and controls all the purse strings and they are they are doing nothing to protect their OWN govt functions.
 
Back
Top