Trump 47
- Thread starter PF5
- Start date
GOGETUMPOKE
Ranger
Big8+4-2-2+2-2+4+4
New member
That’s about the level of deep thought I expected…
You cannot be this gullible. Enjoy the oligarchy.
JTOSU
Ranger
The oligarchy! LOL.
Dang, when you some of you drink your media kool-aid you down it!
PJ-OSU
New member
Monday (morning, no less), you say….
Will this finally be your FAFO moment?
Not gullible…actively complicit.
Yep. I wasn’t asking. It was a statement.
I still think that is GoGetUhm’s sock. Even has the same weak azz rebuttals.
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks like the protests are starting up.
What leads you to believe we’re not headed towards an oligarchy?
PF5
Sheriff
Mislead, misdirect, mischaracterize.Nice link to nothing.
i give you a link that says that it was classified and they did not have the clearance. You gave me nothing, not even logic.
So, what you are saying was that they had all the appropriate clearances, but went ahead and removed the director of security for no reason at all?
And, here is another link backing the claim that also has logic on its side. This media claims three sources. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...ing-elon-musks-doge-employees-acce-rcna190357
EDIT: Now I see why you did not provide the link to your "information from APNews". APNews says:
Musk’s DOGE crew lacked high enough security clearance to access that information, so the two USAID security officials — John Voorhees and deputy Brian McGill — believed themselves legally obligated to deny access.
BUT, they did quote someone from DOGE:
Kate Miller, who serves on an advisory board for DOGE, said in a separate post that no classified material was accessed “without proper security clearances.”
So, your claim that "APNews" said that was just a DOGE spokesperson making the claim. Gee, if your investigation of illegal activity begins and ends with asking the accused, there will probably never be any illegal activity. Nice try to cover the breaking of federal law that you favor because you are for party over country.
Your "missing" link- https://apnews.com/article/doge-mus...n=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter
I guess we can add deliberately deceive now.
Stillwater Townie
Ranger
Mexican cartels 'not worried' about Trump's crackdown, citing increased 'demand' for services.
www.themirror.com
Mexican cartels 'not worried' about Trump's crackdown amid increased 'demand'
Mexico's infamous cartels are reportedly "not worried" about President Trump's crackdown on immigration and the labeling of their groups as foreign terrorist organizations, citing an increased "demand" for services
www.themirror.com
mugatu
Ranger
He probably didn't/doesn't care that the orange one was storing boxes of classified (TS SCI and program level) in his bathroom and showing to visitors so why would he care about some silly old stuff that the Treasury Dept has...Nice link to nothing.
i give you a link that says that it was classified and they did not have the clearance. You gave me nothing, not even logic.
So, what you are saying was that they had all the appropriate clearances, but went ahead and removed the director of security for no reason at all?
And, here is another link backing the claim that also has logic on its side. This media claims three sources. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...ing-elon-musks-doge-employees-acce-rcna190357
EDIT: Now I see why you did not provide the link to your "information from APNews". APNews says:
Musk’s DOGE crew lacked high enough security clearance to access that information, so the two USAID security officials — John Voorhees and deputy Brian McGill — believed themselves legally obligated to deny access.
BUT, they did quote someone from DOGE:
Kate Miller, who serves on an advisory board for DOGE, said in a separate post that no classified material was accessed “without proper security clearances.”
So, your claim that "APNews" said that was just a DOGE spokesperson making the claim. Gee, if your investigation of illegal activity begins and ends with asking the accused, there will probably never be any illegal activity. Nice try to cover the breaking of federal law that you favor because you are for party over country.
Your "missing" link- https://apnews.com/article/doge-mus...n=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter
Some people don't care about protecting our country.
mugatu
Ranger
Dude. We've been run by oligarchy for a decade plus. Money from the ultra wealthy runs our government. Has at least since citizens united and is only getting stronger.
mugatu
Ranger
So who is vetting the people being hurriedly hired by DOGE to break into everything?
Elon Musk’s Friends Have Infiltrated Another Government Agency
Elon Musk’s former employees are trying to use White House credentials to access General Services Administration tech, giving them the potential to remote into laptops, read emails, and more, sources say.www.wired.com
mugatu
Ranger
It's Monday at about 7:30am EST. Looking at the market before opening and Dow is -600 (1.34%), Nasdaq is -380 (1.76%). and S&P is -93 (1.53%).
Still waiting for it to be not an issue by today.
Last edited:
Similar threads
