Trump 47

Last edited:
I have a buddy who is a Tulsa Police officer. He started polling the homeless people he had contact with and 75% of them were from DFW where they were offered a choice of bus tickets to OKC or Tulsa.
On a more serious side. Did Texas decide it wasn't worth it to ship homeless to blue states and thought "OK is closer,l/cheaper and they won't notice"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PF5

I assume this means they will lay off everyone but her to effectively shut it down without congress officially doing so. Wonder what's going to happen when states bring cases against the administration regarding not using congressionally appropriated funds again.
 

@CowboyJD is this an action that should cause concern? I am unfamiliar if this is a normal thing or an example of the White House ignoring the courts.
IMO, it's not an example of the White House ignoring the courts like you are worried about.

There's been a civil subpoena filed against Charles Ezell to testify in court.

If he doesn't comply with that subpoena, there is a whole host Motions that can be filed to enforce or quash the subpoena and compel his attendance. Ultimately, the court does have the authority to find him in contempt of the subpoena and fine/jail him, etc. which then can be appealed yada, yada, yada.

It's fairly common to squabble over subpoenas for testimony in these types of situations.....at least in civil situations/lawsuits.

This is all subject to the caveat that I am primarily practice in criminal and con-law fields as opposed to civil lawsuits and that has been the case for 35 years or so.
 
IMO, it's not an example of the White House ignoring the courts like you are worried about.

There's been a civil subpoena filed against Charles Ezell to testify in court.

If he doesn't comply with that subpoena, there is a whole host Motions that can be filed to enforce or quash the subpoena and compel his attendance. Ultimately, the court does have the authority to find him in contempt of the subpoena and fine/jail him, etc. which then can be appealed yada, yada, yada.

It's fairly common to squabble over subpoenas for testimony in these types of situations.....at least in civil situations/lawsuits.

This is all subject to the caveat that I am primarily practice in criminal and con-law fields as opposed to civil lawsuits and that has been the case for 35 years or so.
Thanks. Holding hope that courts keep things in check at leasylt to sone extent and don't get ignored, so wanted to make sure this wasn't a big deal yet.
 

In the past with US Intel the US would have informed Ukraine when the missile was launched allowing them time to sound alarms and remove people from the targeted area. Trump is accidently going to get American's overseas Killed with this

US Intel Blockage against Ukraine Blamed for Russian Missile Strike that hit hotel where Americans and British volunteers had just checked in


What To Know​

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on social media platform Telegram that a Russian missile struck a hotel in central Ukraine on Wednesday night and that it claimed the lives of four people and injured more than 30. He wrote that just before the strike, volunteers from a humanitarian organization from the U.S., U.K. and Ukraine checked into the hotel.

Zelensky added that many civilian facilities adjacent to the hotel were damaged in the strike.

The Ukrainian, British and American volunteers managed to survive the strike by escaping in time, according to both Zelensky and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine.

Kryvyi Rih has been one of Moscow's frequent targets throughout the war as it is the Ukrainian president's hometown, according to Reuters.

The strike swiftly followed the U.S.'s announcement that it has banned its allies, including the U.K., from sharing American intelligence with Ukraine, jeopardizing Kyiv's ability to coordinate strikes against Russian aggression.


Speaking to Fox News, CIA Director John Ratcliffe said that the U.S.'s move, as well as its pause on the provision of military aid, could be lifted if Washington works with Kyiv toward peace.

Although allies will be prevented from sharing U.S. intelligence, assets inside Ukraine will likely continue to do so. This U.S.-generated information passed on within the country, however, would not include time-sensitive and high-value intelligence which is needed for precision strikes on movable Russian targets.


What People Are Saying

Denis Kazansky, a Ukrainian journalist, wrote on X: "Trump paused intelligence sharing with Ukraine to stop retaliatory strikes against Russia. But Russia has not stopped striking Ukraine and now continues to kill Ukrainians who cannot defend themselves. Today Russian army just attacked a hotel in city of Krivyi Rig. There are dead and wounded. Does it look like Putin wants peace?"

Svitlana Morenets, a Ukrainian journalist based in the U.K., wrote on X: "Trump wanted to 'stop the killings' so badly that he cut aid to Ukraine and halted intelligence sharing, preventing air defences from receiving real-time information for long-range strikes. Now, even more Ukrainian civilians will die. Kryvyi Rih right now."

Brian Krassenstein, a political commentator, wrote on X: "BREAKING: Russian President Vladimir Putin has reportedly launched a ballistic missile strike on a hotel filled with innocent civilians in Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine. This devastating attack comes just hours after Trump halted the sharing of intelligence with Ukraine—intel that may have directly impacted their defensive operations. Putin appears to have exploited this gap, using it as an opportunity to strike, and now innocent lives have been lost as a result. Trump is helping Putin kill innocent people. STOP THIS INSANITY!"


What Happens Next​

France's Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu said that Paris has "intelligence resources that we use to help the Ukrainians." This could help fill the gap of U.S. intelligence.
 
What a complete sh!t show

BREAKING: Trump says, in a social media post, that "Mexico will not be required to pay tariffs on anything that falls under USMCA agreement"

1000004214.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BREAKING: President Trump is considering a major change to the U.S.’ participation in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, according to three current and former senior U.S. officials and one congressional official to NBC News.

 
NEW: Some U.S. allies are considering scaling back the intelligence they share with Washington in response to the Trump administration’s conciliatory approach to Russia, sources with direct knowledge of the discussions tell NBC News.
 
Back
Top