Trump 2024 Run Thread

Mark Kelly on Fox News: "Mexico is the US's biggest trading partner. If Donald Trump kills trade with Mexico, he's killing jobs here in the US, and when you combine that with what he said about the CHIPS Act, his economic plan is really really awful for the state of Arizona."

 
Just pure fiction

In a message to Gun Owners of America, Trump claims that Harris is going to confiscate everyone’s guns: “That’s really putting her alongside some of the most dangerous dictators anywhere in history.”

 
Just pure fiction

In a message to Gun Owners of America, Trump claims that Harris is going to confiscate everyone’s guns: “That’s really putting her alongside some of the most dangerous dictators anywhere in history.”

Makes something up and then rails on her for said made up claim with additional exaggeration.
 

To solve this problem, Théo argued that pollsters should use what are known as neighbor polls that ask respondents which candidates they expect their neighbors to support. The idea is that people might not want to reveal their own preferences, but will indirectly reveal them when asked to guess who their neighbors plan to vote for.
It’s admirable but about 10 days after the dncc it was obvious
 
just watched trump's acceptance speech from the other day/night and...wow...good lord...bumbling, fumbling speech...'we' elected this fool...AGAIN...smh
 
Armstrong's plan for Trump to eliminate the federal income is incomprehensible how it would work. The easier part is where he thinks no corporate income tax would attract companies to the U. S. from around the world. Just lowering the corporate income tax to 15% would help. He has said deductions from your paycheck for SS and Medicare would remain. But no mention of any tariffs needed. Trump has though because he said tariffs funded the federal government during the 1890s. But is he ignorant that the federal government didn't need much money back then because it was so much smaller?

Martin Armstrong:
"...We do not need the income tax anymore because we create money anyway. We don’t need to get some money back like gold coins from the public so we can pay our bills. This is an old theory. So, income tax is something we do not need, and we certainly do not need to borrow anymore. Our national debt is exploding because of interest expenditures. . . . You eliminate the income tax, and you are going to have the biggest economic boom in absolute history. You will create so many jobs. You won’t have to worry about the debt. . . . We would get rid of the debt, and the equity would be private companies. If you wanted to create your own studio, there would be capital available to do that.”

The other side of the story says an 85% tariff would be needed.
 
Last edited:
Armstrong's plan for Trump to eliminate the federal income is incomprehensible how it would work. He thinks no corporate income tax would attract companies to the U. S. from around the world. Just lowering the income tax to 15% would help. He has said deductions from your paycheck for SS and Medicare would remain. No mention of any tariffs needed. Trump has though because he said tariffs funded the federal government during the 1890s. But is he ignorant that the federal government didn't need much money back then because it was so much smaller?

Martin Armstrong:
"...We do not need the income tax anymore because we create money anyway. We don’t need to get some money back like gold coins from the public so we can pay our bills. This is an old theory. So, income tax is something we do not need, and we certainly do not need to borrow anymore. Our national debt is exploding because of interest expenditures. . . . You eliminate the income tax, and you are going to have the biggest economic boom in absolute history. You will create so many jobs. You won’t have to worry about the debt. . . . We would get rid of the debt, and the equity would be private companies. If you wanted to create your own studio, there would be capital available to do that.”

The other side of the story says an 85% tariff would be needed.
It won't happen, and he won't even try it.

When I was in 10th grade, a guy ran for student class president saying we would get Mazzio's in the cafeteria and could wear hats all day. He won in a landslide. You know what we didn't get? Mazzios and hats.
 
Dude is one of the leaders of independent media where people can actually say what's on their mind without getting rode by someone with a corporate agenda. Rogan's had some of the leftist of the left on his show and has had great conversations that even I enjoyed listening to. I'm sure Harris will get her shot...

Blogs like Rogan's are the only places you are going to get unfiltered, unedited, and unmanaged opinions of some of the most interesting people in this country, and it blows my people can't see that.

As I mentioned before, if you listen to his podcast you are going to be subjected to viewpoints that you don't agree with. Some people can't handle that.
Unfiltered, unedited, and unmanaged independent media who turned down the chance to interview Zelensky?

If this is what one of the leaders of media does, we are really in trouble.

 
Unfiltered, unedited, and unmanaged independent media who turned down the chance to interview Zelensky?

If this is what one of the leaders of media does, we are really in trouble.


So, this is old and surprised to see it come up LOL. I mean WTF?

Either way the words unfiltered, unedited, and unmanaged were clearly in regard to the interview style itself not the choices of interviewees of one source. There are 100s of established independent blogs out there. I'm sure Zelenski has reached out to many of them.
 
Back
Top