mugatu
Ranger
That'll get the millennial vote out. Gotta have that avocado toast.
Trump 2024 Run Thread
- Thread starter Polds4OSU
- Start date
Polds4OSU
Marshall
Mark Kelly on Fox News: "Mexico is the US's biggest trading partner. If Donald Trump kills trade with Mexico, he's killing jobs here in the US, and when you combine that with what he said about the CHIPS Act, his economic plan is really really awful for the state of Arizona."
www.threads.net
Aaron Rupar (@aaron.rupar) on Threads
Mark Kelly on Fox News: "Mexico is the US's biggest trading partner. If Donald Trump kills trade with Mexico, he's killing jobs here in the US, and when you combine that with what he said about the CHIPS Act, his economic plan is really really awful for the state of Arizona."
www.threads.net
Polds4OSU
Marshall
Just pure fiction
In a message to Gun Owners of America, Trump claims that Harris is going to confiscate everyone’s guns: “That’s really putting her alongside some of the most dangerous dictators anywhere in history.”
www.threads.net
In a message to Gun Owners of America, Trump claims that Harris is going to confiscate everyone’s guns: “That’s really putting her alongside some of the most dangerous dictators anywhere in history.”
Ron Filipkowski (@ronaldfilipkowski) on Threads
In a message to Gun Owners of America, Trump claims that Harris is going to confiscate everyone’s guns: “That’s really putting her alongside some of the most dangerous dictators anywhere in history.”
www.threads.net
mugatu
Ranger
Makes something up and then rails on her for said made up claim with additional exaggeration.Just pure fiction
In a message to Gun Owners of America, Trump claims that Harris is going to confiscate everyone’s guns: “That’s really putting her alongside some of the most dangerous dictators anywhere in history.”
Ron Filipkowski (@ronaldfilipkowski) on Threads
In a message to Gun Owners of America, Trump claims that Harris is going to confiscate everyone’s guns: “That’s really putting her alongside some of the most dangerous dictators anywhere in history.”
GOGETUMPOKE
Ranger
To solve this problem, Théo argued that pollsters should use what are known as neighbor polls that ask respondents which candidates they expect their neighbors to support. The idea is that people might not want to reveal their own preferences, but will indirectly reveal them when asked to guess who their neighbors plan to vote for.
It’s admirable but about 10 days after the dncc it was obvious
GOGETUMPOKE
Ranger
I called it a lot sooner than that.
Yeah. I was giving them grace
They need to get Letitia James under control or she might ruin the whole party for a generation
Stillwater Townie
Ranger
Armstrong's plan for Trump to eliminate the federal income is incomprehensible how it would work. The easier part is where he thinks no corporate income tax would attract companies to the U. S. from around the world. Just lowering the corporate income tax to 15% would help. He has said deductions from your paycheck for SS and Medicare would remain. But no mention of any tariffs needed. Trump has though because he said tariffs funded the federal government during the 1890s. But is he ignorant that the federal government didn't need much money back then because it was so much smaller?
Martin Armstrong:
"...We do not need the income tax anymore because we create money anyway. We don’t need to get some money back like gold coins from the public so we can pay our bills. This is an old theory. So, income tax is something we do not need, and we certainly do not need to borrow anymore. Our national debt is exploding because of interest expenditures. . . . You eliminate the income tax, and you are going to have the biggest economic boom in absolute history. You will create so many jobs. You won’t have to worry about the debt. . . . We would get rid of the debt, and the equity would be private companies. If you wanted to create your own studio, there would be capital available to do that.”
usawatchdog.com
The other side of the story says an 85% tariff would be needed.
www.forbes.com
Martin Armstrong:
"...We do not need the income tax anymore because we create money anyway. We don’t need to get some money back like gold coins from the public so we can pay our bills. This is an old theory. So, income tax is something we do not need, and we certainly do not need to borrow anymore. Our national debt is exploding because of interest expenditures. . . . You eliminate the income tax, and you are going to have the biggest economic boom in absolute history. You will create so many jobs. You won’t have to worry about the debt. . . . We would get rid of the debt, and the equity would be private companies. If you wanted to create your own studio, there would be capital available to do that.”
Trump Wins, Eliminates Federal Income Tax, Economy Booms – Martin Armstrong | Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog
By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Saturday Post) Legendary financial and geopolitical cycle analyst Martin Armstrong is back with some important predictions in his last appearance before the 2024 Election. First, Armstrong's Socrates computer is still predicting a Trump landslide. Socrates...
usawatchdog.com
The other side of the story says an 85% tariff would be needed.
Can Trump Eliminate The Income Tax? Maybe With An 85% Tariff
The idea of eliminating the income tax is an attractive one to anyone that has ever had to cut a check to Uncle Sam—but it is far from practical.
www.forbes.com
Last edited:
It won't happen, and he won't even try it.Armstrong's plan for Trump to eliminate the federal income is incomprehensible how it would work. He thinks no corporate income tax would attract companies to the U. S. from around the world. Just lowering the income tax to 15% would help. He has said deductions from your paycheck for SS and Medicare would remain. No mention of any tariffs needed. Trump has though because he said tariffs funded the federal government during the 1890s. But is he ignorant that the federal government didn't need much money back then because it was so much smaller?
Martin Armstrong:
"...We do not need the income tax anymore because we create money anyway. We don’t need to get some money back like gold coins from the public so we can pay our bills. This is an old theory. So, income tax is something we do not need, and we certainly do not need to borrow anymore. Our national debt is exploding because of interest expenditures. . . . You eliminate the income tax, and you are going to have the biggest economic boom in absolute history. You will create so many jobs. You won’t have to worry about the debt. . . . We would get rid of the debt, and the equity would be private companies. If you wanted to create your own studio, there would be capital available to do that.”
Trump Wins, Eliminates Federal Income Tax, Economy Booms – Martin Armstrong | Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog
By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Saturday Post) Legendary financial and geopolitical cycle analyst Martin Armstrong is back with some important predictions in his last appearance before the 2024 Election. First, Armstrong's Socrates computer is still predicting a Trump landslide. Socrates...
The other side of the story says an 85% tariff would be needed.
Can Trump Eliminate The Income Tax? Maybe With An 85% Tariff
The idea of eliminating the income tax is an attractive one to anyone that has ever had to cut a check to Uncle Sam—but it is far from practical.
When I was in 10th grade, a guy ran for student class president saying we would get Mazzio's in the cafeteria and could wear hats all day. He won in a landslide. You know what we didn't get? Mazzios and hats.
PF5
Sheriff
Trump on Day 1: Begin deportation push, pardon Jan. 6 rioters and make his criminal cases vanish
Donald Trump has ambitious Day 1 plans for when he moves back into the White House in January.
apnews.com
Yeah that’s a weak move by Rogan.
Everything he does is weak. He a grifter just like the rest and so many have fallen for it.
But no one should get their news from Rogan. /s
So, this is old and surprised to see it come up LOL. I mean WTF?
Either way the words unfiltered, unedited, and unmanaged were clearly in regard to the interview style itself not the choices of interviewees of one source. There are 100s of established independent blogs out there. I'm sure Zelenski has reached out to many of them.
I used to regularly listen to Rogan. He would have Alex Jones on but would make fun of him and reiterate time and again that his podcast shouldn’t be your news source. He’s gone too crazy for me now. It’s literally for dumb people now. No offense to anyone here.
Admit it. You mean a little offense
A. The argument was about independent media. Joe Rogan is a prime example and the point I was pushing is that he offers sources that wouldn't have an open unedited platform just that.
B. I'm not going back in time to check but I believe that debate was kicked of by your posting of a duo of interviewees on Rogan speaking about the medical industry. I listened to it and found it informative. More so than anything I would get from traditional media. Folks were saying they wouldn't listened because of Rogan. I thought that was silly and was calling it as such.
C. Speaking of Yang, I also got the most out of him with a Rogan interview. Same with Bernie. Same with many. It's a good thing.
D. Specifically with Rogan, he hasn't entertained a lot of foreign dignitaries. I can't name any, but I don't listen to all of them. That type of interview just doesn't seem in his lane.
E. Yes, his podcast and any other is never going to be sole source media.
