Now THAT'S logical and reasonable!Yeah sure.
As the most logical and reasonable poster here I predict a 4-8 record for the squats. That's going to be the norm for new Nebraska for a while.
Now THAT'S logical and reasonable!Yeah sure.
As the most logical and reasonable poster here I predict a 4-8 record for the squats. That's going to be the norm for new Nebraska for a while.
Now THAT'S logical and reasonable!
Yeah sure.
As the most logical and reasonable poster here I predict a 4-8 record for the squats. That's going to be the norm for new Nebraska for a while.
Hang the f*****g banner!Final Thoughts
Most Sensible: Cowboyinexile stands out
![]()
good jobWTLDFR
I see you outsourced your thinking to AI. For most this is a bad idea, but for you its probably not the worst thing.good job
- jobob85 (Bent Member, Patreon Supporter)
- Posting Style: Jobob85 posts moderately (6 posts) with a sarcastic, questioning tone. They challenge Midnight Toker’s optimism (e.g., “In the SEC? Hoping to beat out Vanderbilt?”) and use humor, like the “Gomer Jones” reference, to mock OU’s coaching.
- Reasonableness: They are reasonably skeptical, pointing out the difficulty of OU competing in the SEC. However, their posts lean more toward sarcasm than detailed critique.
Additional Observations: Jobob85’s posts are consistent with the board’s OSU-leaning tone, and they seem to enjoy challenging Midnight Toker’s optimism without escalating to personal attacks.
I see you outsourced your thinking to AI. For most this is a bad idea, but for you its probably not the worst thing.
You have been validated as being most sensible by a 3rd party objective observer, good job.Final Thoughts
Most Sensible: Cowboyinexile stands out
![]()
Yeah sure.
As the most logical and reasonable poster here I predict a 4-8 record for the squats. That's going to be the norm for new Nebraska for a while.
I just asked it to make observations about posters on this thread. I already made my own biased observations, but in this context, asking it to evaluate content like this, Ai is unbiased and objectiveI see you outsourced your thinking to AI. For most this is a bad idea, but for you its probably not the worst thing.
I dunno about that, nothing will be as bad as last year by losing 7+ offensive starters, having a horrible OC completely in over his head, and a young inexperienced qb who shat down his leg all year and still winning 6 games. It was a miracle that they were 2 plays away from being 8-4 despite all of those circumstances.Now THAT'S logical and reasonable!
Bless your heart.I just asked it to make observations about posters on this thread. I already made my own biased observations, but in this context, asking it to evaluate content like this, Ai is unbiased and objective
Whuuuut? You bet? What happened to I never bet?You have been validated as being most sensible by a 3rd party objective observer, good job.
Then you went and said a really unsensible thing sir. Honestly though, I would really love to see you putting money on OU winning less than 5 games, the odds on that would be pretty spectacular. I put money on the over of 6.5 but the odds were a pretty sad at -200, so I have to bet a lot to win anything. I wonder what 4-8 odds are, like -10000
I dunno about that, nothing will be as bad as last year by losing 7+ offensive starters, having a horrible OC completely in over his head, and a young inexperienced qb who shat down his leg all year and still winning 6 games. It was a miracle that they were 2 plays away from being 8-4 despite all of those circumstances.
it's reasonable to assume injuries wont devastate them like last year
You have been validated as being most sensible by a 3rd party objective observer, good job.
Then you went and said a really unsensible thing sir. Honestly though, I would really love to see you putting money on OU winning less than 5 games, the odds on that would be pretty spectacular. I put money on the over of 6.5 but the odds were a pretty sad at -200, so I have to bet a lot to win anything. I wonder what 4-8 odds are, like -10000
good job
- jobob85 (Bent Member, Patreon Supporter)
- Posting Style: Jobob85 posts moderately (6 posts) with a sarcastic, questioning tone. They challenge Midnight Toker’s optimism (e.g., “In the SEC? Hoping to beat out Vanderbilt?”) and use humor, like the “Gomer Jones” reference, to mock OU’s coaching.
- Reasonableness: They are reasonably skeptical, pointing out the difficulty of OU competing in the SEC. However, their posts lean more toward sarcasm than detailed critique.
Additional Observations: Jobob85’s posts are consistent with the board’s OSU-leaning tone, and they seem to enjoy challenging Midnight Toker’s optimism without escalating to personal attacks.
I don't gamble on stuff like that. Too many variables (i.e. Bama laying a complete egg last year. If I gambled though I'd take the under on 6.5 all day long.
Probably 3-1 in non conference because you aren't beating Michigan. Now find 4 more SEC wins being objective.
As for long term, your HC isnt the guy and I dont know that your school has enough rich boosters to remain competitive in your conference. To be fair its a concern both fan bases should share but for us its less of a liability due to conference affiliation. Around you, the Texas schools and Arky have scary money. I think Mizzou struggles and Kentucky puts most of their NIL into basketball so you probably got them. After that you have the SEC egos of schools like Tennessee, Bama, LSU, and Florida to name a few so they aren't going to get outspent by Texas. Mississippi State and Vandy you probably beat long term too.
So you will have a potential cash advance over what, 4 schools in the conference and most of the schools there are probably willing to throw money at kids to keep them away from competitors. You are a quarter century away from your last natty and over 50 years from being a dynasty type school. I don't see how you can objectively look and think you will be competitive at the top of your conference any time soon.