Middle East

[Polds4OSU]

NEW: U.S. officials say Russia is providing Iran with intelligence to target American forces in the Middle East, including the locations of U.S. warships and aircraft, WaPo reports. Pete Hegseth recently said Russia is “not really a factor here.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/03/06/russia-iran-intelligence-us-targets/

 

[Rob B.]

Can you please show us anything from Tennessee Holler that isn't just factual reporting of events that run counter to your belief system.

You mean aside from all the straight biased opinions he posts?

 

[GratefulPoke]

You mean aside from all the straight biased opinions he posts?

Rob, this is your main issue. It is the MAGA calling card. You (and MAGA) don't know the difference between bias and factual reporting. A source can be biased and factual. It can be unbiased and nonfactual and anything in between.

Your copy pastas of long facebook posts are biased and nonfactual. Sorry to break that to you.

 

[CowboyJD]

Rob, this is your main issue. It is the MAGA calling card. You (and MAGA) don't know the difference between bias and factual reporting. A source can be biased and factual. It can be unbiased and nonfactual and anything in between.

Your copy pastas of long facebook posts are biased and nonfactual. Sorry to break that to you.

 

[cowboyinexile]

NEW: U.S. officials say Russia is providing Iran with intelligence to target American forces in the Middle East, including the locations of U.S. warships and aircraft, WaPo reports. Pete Hegseth recently said Russia is “not really a factor here.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/03/06/russia-iran-intelligence-us-targets/

Or Iran could just follow Hegseth on social media. Dude is a walking spigot of intelligence. Which is ironic as intelligence is something he struggles with. I don't know how the guy is able to tie his shoes.

 

[cowboyinexile]

Rob, this is your main issue. It is the MAGA calling card. You (and MAGA) don't know the difference between bias and factual reporting. A source can be biased and factual. It can be unbiased and nonfactual and anything in between.

Your copy pastas of long facebook posts are biased and nonfactual. Sorry to break that to you.

Many people don't want to hear the truth. They just want to hear what they already believe reported as the truth.

 

[Polds4OSU]

Many people don't want to hear the truth. They just want to hear what they already believe reported as the truth.

Why I always try to post a link from social media that Includes an actual video of the words being spoken by the person saying them

I'm not looking at the source, I'm looking at the evidence of that person saying it so everyone can watch and see and hear it with their own ears


Many don't want to click it because of the source, I get it, but don't target the source when it contains an actual video of the actual person saying the actual things

I post links to social media based on the content you will get to see and hear with your own senses so you can draw your own conclusions and try to avoid social Media without evidence in it....but sometimes they say some stuff without evidence that is true and needs to be considered

 

[Rob B.]

Rob, this is your main issue. It is the MAGA calling card. You (and MAGA) don't know the difference between bias and factual reporting. A source can be biased and factual. It can be unbiased and nonfactual and anything in between.

Your copy pastas of long facebook posts are biased and nonfactual. Sorry to break that to you.

So it's ok to post biased non-factual things as long as it's from the left. Got it!

Seems like high horse but it's yours to ride.

 

[Rob B.]

Why I always try to post a link from social media that Includes an actual video of the words being spoken by the person saying them

I'm not looking at the source, I'm looking at the evidence of that person saying it so everyone can watch and see and hear it with their own ears


Many don't want to click it because of the source, I get it, but don't target the source when it contains an actual video of the actual person saying the actual things

I post links to social media based on the content you will get to see and hear with your own senses so you can draw your own conclusions and try to avoid social Media without evidence in it....but sometimes they say some stuff without evidence that is true and needs to be considered

You've posted things claiming they were from the Epstein files that were false. But it's ok as long as it made the right look bad. The hypocrisy in this "echo chamber" is unreal.

 

[GratefulPoke]

So it's ok to post biased non-factual things as long as it's from the left. Got it!

Seems like high horse but it's yours to ride.

That would be your takeaway from this exchange. Its literally the exact opposite of what I said.

 

[Rob B.]

That would be your takeaway from this exchange. Its literally the exact opposite of what I said.

Opposite of what you "say" is not opposite of what is allowed.

 

[PF5]

So it's ok to post biased non-factual things as long as it's from the left. Got it!

Seems like high horse but it's yours to ride.

 

[Rob B.]

View attachment 19150

Yep you're missing it for sure.

 

[Polds4OSU]

You've posted things claiming they were from the Epstein files that were false. But it's ok as long as it made the right look bad. The hypocrisy in this "echo chamber" is unreal.

And I've always worked to and updated and removed things for being called out as non factual and apologized when it happens.

You know that making an Effort part to relay factual information. If you take issues with ANY POST with facts I will be more than happy to research it and I will be more than happy to apologize and remove it if it is wrong

I actually WELCOME this, because if you haven't noticed I post things that I know I can nuke people like you on when you try to call it out

Challenge me please....I want that challenge. Make me prove what I post is true, because I'm willing to take that up and debate it ....please

 

[steross]

You mean aside from all the straight biased opinions he posts?

You were asked for an example of what you are complaining about by a person who isn't typically in the fray. If you can't even provide a single example, do you really think you are going to get people to think about change? Is there misinformation on both sides? Of course. Do I feel that this current administration and the media sources they use far surpass the misinformation of others? Absolutely. I'd be willing to have my mind changed. But, that certainly isn't going to do it.

 

[PF5]

Yep you're missing it for sure.

great comeback robbie...you sound like pee wee...

 

[cowboyinexile]

Something about pigeons and chess.

 

[CowboyJD]

So it's ok to post biased non-factual things as long as it's from the left. Got it!

Seems like high horse but it's yours to ride.

 

[TheMonkey]

Yep you're missing it for sure.

There you go, Rob. Unbiased and factual (the gif anyway). Well done!!!

 

[TheMonkey]

It is. And I realize @Rob B. thinks he is bringing balance to this den of Leftist propaganda. Ironically, though, he’s just reinforcing the stereotype that MAGA is a cult.

Meanwhile, I would truly appreciate some more conservative opinions being shared in here. But I would hope they would be done in good faith, unlike a few posters in here.

Also, there probably are a lot of things posted in here that come from left-leaning social media feeds, which are biased and/or not factual. I scroll past a lot of stuff posted by @Polds4OSU. Partly because of quantity and partly because of quality. I typically only read their posts that other members reply to. I don’t have time to read and verify all of those posts. Nor do I want to spend all my time on one side of the issues.