Always a tweet or a video of Trump doing exactly what he scolded in the past. Always.
Middle East
- Thread starter PF5
- Start date
Avodah Zarah 37a | Sefaria Library
The Gemara explains the reason for this opinion: Since a nine-year-old boy is fit to engage in intercourse, he also imparts ritual impurity as one who...
www.sefaria.org
Man, Whit. I don't know. I mean that's terrible and all, but that post seems pretty antisemitic.
Avodah Zarah 37a | Sefaria Library
The Gemara explains the reason for this opinion: Since a nine-year-old boy is fit to engage in intercourse, he also imparts ritual impurity as one who...
Whit, what is your obsession with sexually deviant Jews? First, why are you focused on underaged sex? Second, you do realize pedophilia is an issue in every culture and people group, right? Third, you’re using an ancient text to accuse modern Jews of endorsing underage sex.
Here’s another ancient Jewish text that conveys killing young boys and keeping young girls as sex slaves is OK:
“Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man intimately. However, all the girls who have not known a man intimately, keep alive for yourselves.”
Oops! This is in our Judeo Christian Bible. It’s from Numbers 31:17-18 (NASB2020).
And here’s an explanation of the Talmud verse you cited:
What Avodah Zarah 37a Actually Discusses
The passage is not a permission or endorsement of child sex — it is a discussion of ritual purity laws (tumah/tahara), specifically about when a person can transmit a particular kind of ritual impurity called ziva. The ages mentioned (3 years for girls, 9 years for boys) are the Talmud’s legal thresholds for when the body is considered physiologically capable of intercourse for the purpose of determining ritual contamination — not a license to engage in such acts. This type of age-threshold reasoning appears throughout ancient legal codes when establishing when biological events have legal ritual consequence
Last edited:
That Jake Shields guy is a self described white nationalist.
This guy is a self described white nationalist and this is an antisemetic post.
I'm going to give you a warning here Whit. I don't want antisemetic stuff posted on the site and it is against site rules. Israel and Israelis are up to a lot of terrible things, and you are welcome to post about that. You are welcome to post about zionism. But if you keep going after jewish people for their ethnicity by posting things like "jews do ....." or "jews are bad, etc" Its going to be a temp ban.
Last edited:
Polds4OSU
Marshall
OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct?
GABBARD: That's right
OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC assess that there was an imminent nuclear threat?
GABBARD: The only person who can determine what is or is not an imminent threat is the president
OSSOFF: False
www.threads.com
GABBARD: That's right
OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC assess that there was an imminent nuclear threat?
GABBARD: The only person who can determine what is or is not an imminent threat is the president
OSSOFF: False
Aaron Rupar (@aaron.rupar) on Threads
OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct? GABBARD: That's right OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian...
www.threads.com
OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct?
GABBARD: That's right
OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC assess that there was an imminent nuclear threat?
GABBARD: The only person who can determine what is or is not an imminent threat is the president
OSSOFF: False
Aaron Rupar (@aaron.rupar) on Threads
OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct? GABBARD: That's right OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian...
Follow up: Doesn't he have people that do that for him?
That's kind of her job right?
Stillwater Townie
Ranger
Fears are Iran could escalate war by shutting down the Red Sea and desalination plants.
Similar threads
