2024 Presidential Election

BREAKING: A diverse group of House Republicans torpedoed Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-La.) proposal to fund the government on Wednesday, dealing an embarrassing blow to the GOP leader and derailing his strategy to avoid a shutdown at the end of the month.

 
God is a Republican??

Lauren Bobert: God will stand up a 'mighty army' to save Colorado from the left

 
While this is typically a partisan move, our state is so overwhelmingly MAGA that I wonder if this actually tips the balance at all?
agree...would like to see the stats on purge broken up by party, but doubt it matters...in 2020 'we' voted trump over Biden 2-1...I believe roughly 1 million vs. 1/2 million...
 
Good Old Democracy

Nebraska may change its electoral system at the last second to help Trump win

American democracy is in a fragile place. If you haven’t figured that out by this point, you haven’t been paying attention. The dangers are coming from all sides. Donald Trump has just survived his second apparent assassination attempt. The governor of Ohio has had to call in the state police to monitor a spate of bomb threats to local schools after falsehoods about Haitian immigrants eating cats and dogs in the area began circulating. That’s aside from all the usual mass shootings, Proud Boy marches and the rest of it. But inside this fomenting turmoil, the most dangerous spot in the whole country, the rock on which the American state may well founder, is the quiet congressional district of Omaha, Nebraska, the very heart of the American heartland.


Omaha is dangerous, not in itself, but due to the entirely weird position it inhabits inside the electoral college. In one of those strange freaks of American politics, Nebraska has a split electoral college vote, and for the past few elections the city of Omaha has reliably voted Democrat. The other two electoral districts vote solidly Republican. Ordinarily, this little hiccup in the system wouldn’t matter much. But 2024 represents a uniquely precarious moment.

As it stands, once you remove the settled Democrat and Republican states, the most direct path to a Kamala Harris victory is by way of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. With those three states, she would receive exactly 270 electoral college seats, the number she needs to win. In that case, she would win if, and only if, she holds that one electoral college vote in the congressional district of Omaha, Nebraska.


The Omaha congressional district hasn’t mattered much due to a kind of bipartisan detente, a balance of power. Nebraska is not the only state that splits its electoral system by district. So does Maine. And Maine, while mostly Democratic, has a similarly reliable Republican constituency, which will almost certainly give its electoral college seat to Trump. If Nebraska changes its system to give Trump an advantage, Maine has said it will reciprocate in order to cancel out any attempt to shift the balance of power.

Largely for this reason, the inclination to change the law has been muted in Nebraska, even though Republicans control the statehouse. Having a contested electoral college seat also makes Nebraska slightly more worthy of attention from both national parties, meaning the current division is, to some small degree, in the interests of Nebraskans on the whole.



Yet that state of detente may be set to unravel. The Maine legislature has now gone out of session, and last Friday, Jim Pillen, the governor of Nebraska, made a public statement: “I strongly support statewide unity and joining 48 other states by awarding all five of our electoral college votes to the presidential candidate who wins the majority of Nebraskans’ votes,” he said. “As I have also made clear, I am willing to convene the Legislature for a special session to fix this 30-year-old problem before the 2024 election. However, I must receive clear and public indication that 33 senators are willing to vote in such a session to restore winner-take-all.”

Pillen is effectively deflecting the electoral college question onto the state senators, but he is also opening the door to the possibility of the switch, which could alter the course of the election.


Republicans would not even need to switch the electoral college seat to win. They only need to muddy the waters. If, for example, the Nebraska legislature ensured that their electoral college votes were in dispute, and the courts had not decided the matter by 6 January, and no one had reached the threshold of 270, that state of affairs would automatically trigger a contingent election. In a contingent election, another abstruse mechanism of the US electoral system, each state delegation, whether it’s California or Wyoming, gets a single vote, which means that the Republicans would always win. (This possibility is the subject of a book I wrote with Andrew Yang, The Last Election.)

The sheer boredom of what I’m describing here, the banal technicalities of the complex legal structures in place, may, on the surface, seem less frightening than assassination attempts and bomb threats and cooked pets and armed militias. But don’t misunderstand: this is the real danger America faces. The complexity is the trap. The complexity makes it easy for people to believe that somehow they haven’t been tricked, that a functioning democratic system, however bizarre, is still in place, even when it clearly isn’t anymore.


It goes without saying that the nightmare I’ve described here – which could absolutely happen – is only one of several glitches in the electoral system which could undo the United States. (Georgia is a whole other nightmare.) The Republicans have set themselves up to maximize incoherence, exactly because they are aware of the vulnerability of the system.

Needless to say, incoherence of outcome is precisely the opposite of what the founders intended when they established the electoral college 240 years ago. They were living in a different world, though. The electoral college was the product of an 18th-century agrarian society whose Capitol sat a hundred miles from virgin forest. At this point in history, it is little more than a legitimacy crisis in progress.

The founders built their system to avoid exactly the kind of situation that the erasure of the district Omaha, Nebraska, would represent: the possibility of democracy in bad faith and by name only.
 
REP. GLENN GROTHMAN: Democrats are so radical that they want migrants voting immediately

C-SPAN HOST: What's the evidence that's happening?

GROTHMAN: I haven't seen it, but you know it's happening, right?

 
Apparently she and RFK Jr were having a relationship she had admitted to


Star political reporter Olivia Nuzzi is on leave from New York magazine after she acknowledged that she had a “personal” relationship with a former 2024 campaign subject while she was reporting on the campaign, the magazine said Thursday night.

 

🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

Lauren Boebert Compares Mike Johnson's Failed Bill to 'Diddy Freak Off'


Representative Lauren Boebert said that Speaker Mike Johnson's failed Continuing Resolution (CR) bill would "screw our country more times over than a Diddy freak off."

Appearing on Steve Bannon's War Room podcast on Wednesday, the Colorado lawmaker expressed her frustrations with the stopgap funding measure, which included the controversial Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act.


"The SAVE Act is a great bill that would secure our elections from illegal aliens voting in there, require voter ID," Boebert told host Mike Davis, who is filling in for Bannon while he serves a prison sentence.

"But this CR, this continuing resolution that we're going to vote on today, it's going to screw our country more times over than a Diddy freak off, so I am not voting for this," Boebert said.


"We've got to stop funding this chaos, this madness."

Newsweek has contacted Boebert by email and Johnson by phone for comment.

Boebert's comparison of Johnson's CR to a "Diddy freak off" referred to the recent allegations against music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs, who has been charged with multiple counts of sex trafficking and racketeering.


Federal prosecutors have accused Combs of orchestrating extended sexual performances that the rapper called freak offs, involving drugs, coercion and commercial sex workers, often electronically recorded for his own purposes.

Boebert was one of 14 Republicans who voted against CR, which would have extended government funding for another six months and included the SAVE Act to require voter ID in federal elections.

The bill, which was rejected in a 202-220 vote, was an attempt to avoid a government shutdown before March 2025.

While Democrats opposed the bill for the inclusion of the SAVE Act, Boebert and other Republicans argued that it does not go far enough in curbing government spending.

"I'm tired of the rubber-stamping," Boebert said in the podcast episode.

Fellow conservative Representatives Matt Gaetz and Nancy Mace were among those who also voted against the bill, echoing concerns about spending and government overreach.


Representative Thomas Massie went as far as calling Johnson's proposal "insincere and unserious," reflecting a broader tension within the Republican Party, as lawmakers on the right grapple with how to address both fiscal issues and controversial policies like voter ID requirements, while holding only a razor-thin majority in the House.

However, critics, including most Democrats, argue that the SAVE Act imposes unnecessary burdens on voters, given that noncitizens are already prohibited from voting in federal elections.

Nevertheless, former President Donald Trump has continued to push claims of widespread election fraud, encouraging Republicans to reject any CR that doesn't include the SAVE Act in full.
 
So I have a really dumb question and probably my lack of being fully familiar.

For things like the SAVE act, where it's making something illegal that is already illegal. What is the harm in passing it? Yes it's dumb and a waste of time and paper, but what in it makes things worse? I'm assuming there's a lot more there than what is described in the synopsis of "it prevents illegals from voting" or it's a path to add other GOP positions to a bill for passage.
 
So I have a really dumb question and probably my lack of being fully familiar.

For things like the SAVE act, where it's making something illegal that is already illegal. What is the harm in passing it? Yes it's dumb and a waste of time and paper, but what in it makes things worse? I'm assuming there's a lot more there than what is described in the synopsis of "it prevents illegals from voting" or it's a path to add other GOP positions to a bill for passage.
it would make it much harder to register to vote as ~25 Million LEGAL US CITIZENS wouldn't even be able to sign up to vote right now under the SAVE act.

9% of Americans (21 Million +) do NOT have a copy of their Proof Of Citizenship which the SAVE act would require you to provide in order to register to vote (right now you have to sign a legal affidavit saying your are a US citizen and agree to legal consequences if it is found you are lying. Meaning states that allow you to sign up to Vote when you sign up for an ID Card would require at least two more forms to get an ID and register to vote at the same time

3.8 MILLION LEGAL US CITIZENS do not even have access to their Proof Of Citizenship as it has been destroyed (mostly home or residential fires)

Every time you move or change polling locations the SAVE act would require you to provide Proof of Citizenship paperwork to re-register to vote at a new polling place

People on Federal Aid Programs would also be required to provide proof of Citizenship paperwork Every Year even though they already had to prove that when they signed up

Online Voting Registration would most likely go away or be made illegal as there needs to be a witness to the paperwork before it is uploaded with the registration

Furthermore, the bill’s language is as dangerously imprecise in some areas as it is draconian in others. There is nothing that makes clear whether a state would have to accept documents from someone whose name has legally changed due to marriage or gender transition. Voters would likewise be allowed to register only if they provide a birth certificate issued by “a state, unit of local government, or a Tribal government.”

That requirement could be waived with a naturalization certificate, say, but would have to be paired with a “valid government-issued photo identification card issued by a Federal, State or Tribal government.” As Del. Gregorio Kilili Camacho Sablan, D-Northern Marianas Islands, pointed out in the floor debate, the bill’s language manages to completely ignore the territories, disenfranchising his constituents even further.
 
Last edited:

Ohio Republican Governor Condemns Trump, Vance in NYT Op-Ed


Ohio Republican Governor Mike DeWine condemned comments made by former President Donald Trump and U.S. Ohio Senator JD Vance about his state, describing them as "disappointing" and "harmful" in an opinion column in The New York Times on Friday.

Amid the 2024 presidential election where immigration is a hot topic issue, Trump and Vance, the former president's running mate, have repeatedly promoted claims that Haitian immigrants, who are in the United States legally, have been "eating the pets" of their neighbors in Springfield, Ohio. During Trump's debate with Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harris on ABC News earlier this month, Trump said dogs and cats were being eaten by the migrants, despite local officials already saying there were no credible reports of this happening.


"In Springfield, they're eating the dogs—the people that came in," Trump claimed about Haitian immigrants. "They're eating the cats. They're eating the pets of the people that live there, and this is what's happening in our country, and it's a shame."

In an X, formerly Twitter, post earlier this month, Vance said his office had received "many inquiries from actual residents of Springfield who've said their neighbors' pets or local wildlife were abducted by Haitian migrants."

He added in a separate X post: "In short, don't let the crybabies in the media dissuade you, fellow patriots. Keep the cat memes flowing."

Springfield has faced a wave of bomb threats since Vance and Trump began amplifying the discredited claims about Haitian immigrants in the city. Hospitals, government buildings and local public schools have all been targeted, causing significant disruptions and concerns within the community.


Meanwhile, during a rally in New York on Wednesday, the former president announced that he would be visiting the city in the next few weeks.

In his op-ed for the Times titled, "I'm the Governor of Ohio. I Don't Recognize the Springfield That Trump and Vance Describe," DeWine wrote, "Springfield has a rich history of providing refuge for the oppressed and being a place of opportunity. As a stop on the Underground Railroad, the Gammon House, which still stands, was a safe haven for escaped slaves seeking freedom. It is disappointing to me that Springfield has become the epicenter of vitriol over America's immigration policy, because it has long been a community of great diversity."


The governor added: "As a supporter of former President Donald Trump and Senator JD Vance, I am saddened by how they and others continue to repeat claims that lack evidence and disparage the legal migrants living in Springfield. This rhetoric hurts the city and its people, and it hurts those who have spent their lives there."



DeWine also condemned the Biden administration's approach to its immigration policy, writing: "The Biden administration's failure to control the southern border is a very important issue that Mr. Trump and Mr. Vance are talking about and one that the American people are rightfully deeply concerned about. But their verbal attacks against these Haitians—who are legally present in the United States—dilute and cloud what should be a winning argument about the border."

Newsweek has contacted the Trump campaign and the Harris campaign for comment via email.

After half a century of economic decline, Springfield worked hard to lure back the manufacturing industry. The plan worked and began creating jobs that ended up attracting immigrants. Between 15,000 and 20,000 Haitian migrants have moved to the city, which had a population of just under 60,000 in 2020, over the space of four years, city officials say.


They are in the country legally, the City of Springfield's Immigration FAQ page says, many under the Immigration Parole Program, which, under certain conditions, allows noncitizens to remain in the U.S. temporarily without meeting standard visa or immigration requirements.

During an interview with ABC News' This Week on Sunday, DeWine was asked about the claims amplified by the Republican presidential ticket and conservative influencers online.

Do you see any evidence, as governor of the state, that Haitian immigrants are eating pets?" host Martha Raddatz asked the Ohio Republican.

"No, absolutely none," DeWine responded. "...There's a lot of garbage on the internet and this is a piece of garbage that was simply not true, there's no evidence of this at all."

Springfield's Mayor Rob Rue also criticized politicians for spreading misinformation about his city.


"All these federal politicians that have negatively spun our city, they need to know they're hurting our city, and it was their words that did it," he recently told local ABC affiliate channel 6 WSYX.

Where Did the 'Eating the Pets' Claim Originate?​

A Springfield resident by the name of Erika Lee made a Facebook post alleging that local Haitian immigrants were "eating pets," which led to significant national attention on the small city. Her post detailed the disappearance of a neighbor's cat and included her neighbor's suspicions that their Haitian residents were involved in the incident.

She admits that she had no direct evidence supporting such a claim and that the incident has left her ridden with guilt and anxiety due to the controversy it generated.

"It just exploded into something I didn't mean to happen," Lee told NBC News last week.

According to NewsGuard, an organization dedicated to combating internet misinformation, Lee was one of the first to spread the baseless rumor on social media, the screenshots of which were widely shared. The neighbor, identified as Kimberly Newton, reportedly got the information about the alleged incident from a third party, as per NewsGuard's findings and reported by NBC News.
 
it would make it much harder to register to vote as ~25 Million LEGAL US CITIZENS wouldn't even be able to sign up to vote right now under the SAVE act.

9% of Americans (21 Million +) do NOT have a copy of their Proof Of Citizenship which the SAVE act would require you to provide in order to register to vote (right now you have to sign a legal affidavit saying your are a US citizen and agree to legal consequences if it is found you are lying. Meaning states that allow you to sign up to Vote when you sign up for an ID Card would require at least two more forms to get an ID and register to vote at the same time

3.8 MILLION LEGAL US CITIZENS do not even have access to their Proof Of Citizenship as it has been destroyed (mostly home or residential fires)

Every time you move or change polling locations the SAVE act would require you to provide Proof of Citizenship paperwork to re-register to vote at a new polling place

People on Federal Aid Programs would also be required to provide proof of Citizenship paperwork Every Year even though they already had to prove that when they signed up

Online Voting Registration would most likely go away or be made illegal as there needs to be a witness to the paperwork before it is uploaded with the registration

Furthermore, the bill’s language is as dangerously imprecise in some areas as it is draconian in others. There is nothing that makes clear whether a state would have to accept documents from someone whose name has legally changed due to marriage or gender transition. Voters would likewise be allowed to register only if they provide a birth certificate issued by “a state, unit of local government, or a Tribal government.”

That requirement could be waived with a naturalization certificate, say, but would have to be paired with a “valid government-issued photo identification card issued by a Federal, State or Tribal government.” As Del. Gregorio Kilili Camacho Sablan, D-Northern Marianas Islands, pointed out in the floor debate, the bill’s language manages to completely ignore the territories, disenfranchising his constituents even further.
Thought there was a reason... and thats a lot of them. Thanks.
 
Back
Top