2024 Presidential Election

The 9 GOP senators who could derail Trump’s Cabinet picks the hill

Multiple Republican senators are looming as potential obstacles to President-elect Trump’s controversial Cabinet picks, especially his two most polarizing choices: former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Trump has had a rocky relationship in the past with a handful of Republicans senators who won’t likely give him the same deference as loyal allies such as Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), who last week called on his GOP colleagues to “get out of the way” and approve Trump’s nominees.


Trump can afford three defections within the Senate GOP conference and still get his picks confirmed.

But four Republican senators would be enough to sink any of his nominees, and two moderates — Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) — have already voiced deep reservations about Gaetz, who was embroiled in a federal sex trafficking investigation, of leading the Justice Department.
...
 
The DOGE jokers are going to have to explain their impossible math. They are strutting around like fools discussing saving Trillions from a $213 billion budget. They point out that they are going after specific agencies yet the agencies they point out have the fewest employees. They use the word "bureaucrat" even though 15% of the federal workforce is administrative or clerical. The most common employees are in health care, mostly for veterans.

Either they are going to fail to do anything close to what they claim, or they are going to devastate the Veterans Administration and DOD.

Finally, they havent even mentioned a real source of government inefficiency in the workforce. The massive amount of federal work that has been given out in lucrative contracts to big business with sweetheart deals that feed congress with campaign funds. Elon isn't dumb, he knows not to complain about the golden egg even if it is the real problem. They are happy to whine about education and call it "local." What about farming, isn't that local? They don't mention getting rid of the Dept Of agriculture. Can't piss off the red state Senators.

View attachment 8391


Article:

Interesting - dismantling military support structures would seem to be their obvious attack point. Do we know anyone out there that would like to see the US military brought down a peg or two? Anyone? And would this TOTALLY THEORETICAL person be connected to Trump in any way?
 
The 9 GOP senators who could derail Trump’s Cabinet picks the hill

Multiple Republican senators are looming as potential obstacles to President-elect Trump’s controversial Cabinet picks, especially his two most polarizing choices: former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Trump has had a rocky relationship in the past with a handful of Republicans senators who won’t likely give him the same deference as loyal allies such as Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), who last week called on his GOP colleagues to “get out of the way” and approve Trump’s nominees.


Trump can afford three defections within the Senate GOP conference and still get his picks confirmed.

But four Republican senators would be enough to sink any of his nominees, and two moderates — Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) — have already voiced deep reservations about Gaetz, who was embroiled in a federal sex trafficking investigation, of leading the Justice Department.
...

I think Hedgeseth’s nomination has already been withdrawn. RFK Jr. might get through. But I can’t see Gaetz making it through the process, nor should he.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

It's unclear how Hegseth would lead the Defense Department, the largest federal department and among the world's largest bureaucracies. But he has made clear, in his own words, that he is critical of military service by women and more specifically opposes female troops serving in combat roles.

"It hasn't made us more effective, hasn't made us more lethal, has made fighting more complicated," Hegseth said on an appearance on "The Shawn Ryan Show" earlier this month.

On that show, he told the host that he was "straight-up saying we should not have women in combat roles."

He shared similar sentiments in his book published in June saying, "Women are life givers, regardless of what the abortion industry might want us to think."

Currently, around 3,800 women are serving in frontline Army combat roles across infantry, cavalry, armor and field artillery roles, according to service data reviewed by Military.com. The data includes active duty, reserve and National Guard, and encompasses enlisted and officers.

Among them, fewer than 10 female Green Berets serve in the Army's most elite units, according to multiple defense officials with direct knowledge. At least one of those women is transgender. Additionally, one woman is currently advancing through the rigorous Special Forces training pipeline, signaling a gradual but significant shift in the makeup of the Army's combat forces.

Meanwhile, 151 women have graduated from the Army's legendary Ranger school, a grueling 61-day combat leadership course.

In the Marine Corps, nearly 700 women are serving in combat roles, including 112 female infantry riflemen and 15 Marine officers. Since fiscal 2018, the number of Marine women in combat roles has more than tripled for enlisted and increased sixfold for officers.
...
Hegseth dedicates a significant portion of his recently published book to criticizing the inclusion of women in combat roles, strongly insinuating -- without offering evidence -- that they benefit from preferential treatment.

In certain cases, he claimed women are unfairly lauded as war heroes. Specifically, Hegseth cites several instances in which women have been awarded medals for valor, saying one woman who earned a Silver Star -- one of the top recognitions for combat bravery -- was swiftly awarded because there was "an agenda."
...
 

It's unclear how Hegseth would lead the Defense Department, the largest federal department and among the world's largest bureaucracies. But he has made clear, in his own words, that he is critical of military service by women and more specifically opposes female troops serving in combat roles.

"It hasn't made us more effective, hasn't made us more lethal, has made fighting more complicated," Hegseth said on an appearance on "The Shawn Ryan Show" earlier this month.

On that show, he told the host that he was "straight-up saying we should not have women in combat roles."

He shared similar sentiments in his book published in June saying, "Women are life givers, regardless of what the abortion industry might want us to think."

Currently, around 3,800 women are serving in frontline Army combat roles across infantry, cavalry, armor and field artillery roles, according to service data reviewed by Military.com. The data includes active duty, reserve and National Guard, and encompasses enlisted and officers.

Among them, fewer than 10 female Green Berets serve in the Army's most elite units, according to multiple defense officials with direct knowledge. At least one of those women is transgender. Additionally, one woman is currently advancing through the rigorous Special Forces training pipeline, signaling a gradual but significant shift in the makeup of the Army's combat forces.

Meanwhile, 151 women have graduated from the Army's legendary Ranger school, a grueling 61-day combat leadership course.

In the Marine Corps, nearly 700 women are serving in combat roles, including 112 female infantry riflemen and 15 Marine officers. Since fiscal 2018, the number of Marine women in combat roles has more than tripled for enlisted and increased sixfold for officers.
...
Hegseth dedicates a significant portion of his recently published book to criticizing the inclusion of women in combat roles, strongly insinuating -- without offering evidence -- that they benefit from preferential treatment.

In certain cases, he claimed women are unfairly lauded as war heroes. Specifically, Hegseth cites several instances in which women have been awarded medals for valor, saying one woman who earned a Silver Star -- one of the top recognitions for combat bravery -- was swiftly awarded because there was "an agenda."
...

When people say they are worried about their daughters with this administration this should be one reason why. If the new secretary of defense sees little value to women in the military you have to wonder what kind of opportunities for promotion will be denied them in favor of male counterparts.

And I know his issue is with women in combat roles, but if that's his attitude I don't see a way it doesn't expand beyond that.
 
When people say they are worried about their daughters with this administration this should be one reason why. If the new secretary of defense sees little value to women in the military you have to wonder what kind of opportunities for promotion will be denied them in favor of male counterparts.

And I know his issue is with women in combat roles, but if that's his attitude I don't see a way it doesn't expand beyond that.
he seems to have male chauvinist qualities...
 
When people say they are worried about their daughters with this administration this should be one reason why. If the new secretary of defense sees little value to women in the military you have to wonder what kind of opportunities for promotion will be denied them in favor of male counterparts.

And I know his issue is with women in combat roles, but if that's his attitude I don't see a way it doesn't expand beyond that.
Don't think it's just combat roles. He said he is critical of women serving. Way to help manning issues, remove half the population from being eligible.
 
how many of tRump's picks have sexual accusations against them?
1. tRump (not a pick, but the guy who is picking these characters)
2. gaetz
3. hegseth
 
how many of tRump's picks have sexual accusations against them?
1. tRump (not a pick, but the guy who is picking these characters)
2. gaetz
3. hegseth
Bill Clinton says hi.
Biden's daughter says sup.
 
It's in her diary.

Ok.

Think About It GIF by Big Potato Games
 
Back
Top