Sounds like gun sales when Dems win.
They only way either of these hard-hitting social subjects ever move is by way of the supreme court. Elected officials are not making the moves on these subjects. Lifetime appointed officials will.
Sounds like gun sales when Dems win.
And who appoints those lifetime appointed officials?They only way either of these hard-hitting social subjects ever move is by way of the supreme court. Elected officials are not making the moves on these subjects. Lifetime appointed officials will.
Elon Musk Is Pissing Off Everyone on Trump’s Team
“He wants to be seen as having say in everything (even if he doesn’t),” one person in Trump’s orbit said.newrepublic.com
Musk starting to piss off Trump's inner circle by acting like Trump is endedited to him and like they are co-presidents.
When two grifters with huge egos collide, there is absolutely no way they don’t end up trying to grift each other.Elon Musk Is Pissing Off Everyone on Trump’s Team
“He wants to be seen as having say in everything (even if he doesn’t),” one person in Trump’s orbit said.newrepublic.com
Musk starting to piss off Trump's inner circle by acting like Trump is endedited to him and like they are co-presidents.
And who appoints those lifetime appointed officials?
Elected officials.
Elon Musk Is Pissing Off Everyone on Trump’s Team
“He wants to be seen as having say in everything (even if he doesn’t),” one person in Trump’s orbit said.newrepublic.com
Musk starting to piss off Trump's inner circle by acting like Trump is endedited to him and like they are co-presidents.
And so it begins.Elon Musk Is Pissing Off Everyone on Trump’s Team
“He wants to be seen as having say in everything (even if he doesn’t),” one person in Trump’s orbit said.newrepublic.com
Musk starting to piss off Trump's inner circle by acting like Trump is endedited to him and like they are co-presidents.
Yeah, they usually let reporters use their names in these articles, so they’ll get fired. What’s up with the secrecy, wussies?OMG, kill me for giving that a click. Really, you got three anonymous quotes from who knows who? Just, WTF?
Yeah, they usually let reporters use their names in these articles, so they’ll get fired. What’s up with the secrecy, wussies?
What part do you find unbelievable?
The SCOTUS ruled that the doctors suing over misoprostol did not have legal standing therefore the FDA decisions on that stand.No doubt about it.
For better or worse, trumps biggest stamp on term one was the appointment of 3 supreme court justices. It's crazy honestly. Hopefully he has made his last appointment.
My point is, nothing is going to change on these topics come January 20th (or whatever the date is). There is no reason to run out and stock up on guns or pills.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fda-rules-tv-drug-ads-144242476.htmlThe combo. And it seemed like they ran one commercial per missed tackle. So, a lot!
I met with a lot of animal pharma reps when I was in the Veterinary industry. Anything thing that happens to the animal during the trial gets put on the label. If they get pancreatitis during, the med will say it could cause that. Doesn’t matter if it actually can or not.At the VA we recently made a formulary conversion from the DPP4 inhibitor alogliptin to a different medication in the class, sitagliptin. In my opinion, sitagliptin is the superior agent, and the VA saved a lot of money in the swap. However, patient information leaflets went out with sitagliptin and mentioned in the list of potential adverse effects was “kidney problems (including dialysis).” The thing is, kidney problems are common to diabetes and nearly every diabetes medication lists kidney problems, including the alogliptin which the sitagliptin replaced. Yet, I was getting all kinds of phone calls from patients who were refusing to take sitagliptin because “I don’t want to take that s**t if it’s going to kill my kidneys.” This leaves me explaining over and over why the PI leaflet says that and how likely it is to happen and how it’s my job specifically to monitor for adverse effects which includes monitoring their kidney function.
People simply don’t understand how adverse effects become listed for medications. They don’t understand the patient information leaflets and those are written specifically for broad understanding. Placing more emphasis on them in commercials won’t help. It would be better to simply do away with the commercials. All DTC pharma advertising does is increase costs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep. Anything that causes a patient to seek health care when they are on a study medication has to be listed as a potential adverse effect of the study medication, even if the patient is on placebo. If a patient is in a phase III trial and walks out in the street and is hit by a bus and killed, "accidental death" is listed as a potential adverse effect.I met with a lot of animal pharma reps when I was in the Veterinary industry. Anything thing that happens to the animal during the trial gets put on the label. If they get pancreatitis during, the med will say it could cause that. Doesn’t matter if it actually can or not.
LOL! Goes on to attack this article in particular.I'm not even attacking this article in particular.
On Wall Street Journal Editorial Report this morning they were talking about the new administration using recess appointments to get all or most of their appointments through because appointees like Gaetz and Hedgeseth face opposition not only from Democrats but also from Republican senators. Doing this wholesale, using recess appointments this way would be the swampiest of the swampiest.I was channel flipping this morning and CBS Face the Nation was on. A republican Senator was asked "Matt Gaetz was serving as a public official. The US taxpayer has paid for a House Ethics Investigation on him and that investigation is complete. Why isn't the report being release?"
He gave a complete non-answer about committees and precedence and blah, blah, blah.
There is no bigger joke than this crew claiming they are going to "drain the swamp." There is nothing swampier than a US Representative with evidence he paid for sex with 17-year-olds who is somehow able to resign to avoid the investigation's release and then go for a Cabinet position.