F*** you for making me link to The Oklahoman.
www.oklahoman.com
Dude, I'm a pro-life conservative Christian who has still never voted for a Democrat in a national election. And I will always be a pro-life conservative Christian, though I have broken away from the evangelicals. I also have a very close relationship with my daughter. I don't need you to tell me how to parent her.
I might be wrong but I think Drummond said to das not to prosecute most of them and the state Supreme Court agreed?F*** you for making me link to The Oklahoman.
Abortion law: Amid presidential debate, other state votes, where does Oklahoma stand?
The abortion issue is still very much alive in Oklahoma. Both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris had something to say at the debate.Is abortion legal in Oklahoma?
Oklahoma's current law makes abortion illegal and the procedure cannot be performed unless it's necessary to protect the mother's life.
And murdered babies evidently won't change yours.
Nope. Because I've spent years dealing with these issues, and calling them "murdered babies" is not reality, it is political fodder like "Pay their fair share" or "Black/All live matter" or "no human is illegal." It pulls up emotion and misses the complexity of the situation. And, of course, I already said that there would be FEWER "murdered babies" if we did it right instead of wasting oodles of money fighting over the law. So, no "murdered babies" will not make me support laws that harm women and isn't even the best thing for babies.
www.nbcnews.com
The libertarian party leadership didn't support Chase Oliver, the nominee because he was not Mises Caucus. They even blocked ballot access in some states. They supported Trump.
I just told a friend of mine that if the Democrats had embraced RFK and Musk there is no doubt in my mind that Harris would have won. Instead they chose to alienate them. Self-inflicted wound.This is a good interview with RFK Jr.
I know many here think he is a crackpot and wouldn't listen to a word he says. There are things that I vehemently disagree with him about but I also have a glimmer of hope about some of the things he is saying. It is interesting to me that people complain about oligarchy and corporate influence on our government. He is saying that he is going to try to weed out this corporate influence on our heath services and nobody on the left seems interested because he isn't acting from the left. The democratic party would not listen to this. Should have, but didn't. Trump did. The food supply in this country is toxic. We allow all kinds of chemicals banned elsewhere because of this influence. Our food guidelines were made by a panel on which 95% of the participants had corporate conflicts of interest. I hope this administration starts the change for this critical issue.
After Trump win, RFK Jr. says he won't 'take away anybody's vaccines'
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who will meet with senior Trump aides Wednesday to discuss his role going forward, said he would eliminate the nutrition departments at the FDA.
What, exactly, do you call intentionally killing an innocent baby?
A baby? That is murder as defined in our laws. Calling a zygote/embryo/fetus a baby is false emotive language.
Correct me if I'm wrong but could congress pass such a law with only 53 Rep Senators? If the Reps do take the house it will be a slim majority. I understand it being an issue though, I never thought Row would be changed until it was. To be honest I thought the backlash would be more than it has been.
Not only that, but concurring opinions in the decision overturning Roe were advocating for re-examination of the constitutional right to birth control and the constitutional right to same sex marriage.
Tell me, if that stage is so important, why does your God kill off >50% before they ever leave the womb?
How the Trump Administration Could Enact a Federal Abortion Ban
While Donald Trump has distanced himself from supporting a federal abortion ban, Republicans and opponents of abortion rights will pressure him to enact one.www.nytimes.com
Both parties in Congress have shown a willingness to change filibuster/cloture rules on issues near and dear to them. Dems did it for advise and consent approvals of federal appointments and lower court judges. Republicans did the same thing to ram through their Supreme Court justices.
