Trump 2024 Run Thread

Donald Trump’s campaign said that it plans to deploy more than 100,000 attorneys and volunteers across battleground states to monitor — and potentially challenge — vote counting in November.

 
Donald Trump’s campaign said that it plans to deploy more than 100,000 attorneys and volunteers across battleground states to monitor — and potentially challenge — vote counting in November.

How can he supervise that in solitary confinement?
 
Donald Trump’s campaign said that it plans to deploy more than 100,000 attorneys and volunteers across battleground states to monitor — and potentially challenge — vote counting in November.

That could result in too much chaos from them not knowing the typical routines election workers are doing and mistaking it for fraud. Probably just more video cameras are needed to monitor the polls to remove temptation for poll workers to do vote fraud.
 
Last edited:
Trump is such a great leader and negotiator that

1) Ds wanted $ for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan

So Rs said no you have to give us something on the border.

2) Ds said ok wel’ll let one of your most conservative senators co draft the most meaningful immigration bill in 20+ yrs w items Rs have been asking for but didn’t pass when they had WH, Senate and House and the Border Patrol said “please pass”

Only to have Trump tell Rs to kill it

Only to have Rs 2 months later bring up and pass …

that same $ for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan.

That really is some next level negotiating and kinda makes you understand how a casino owner can bankrupt his own casino.
 
Trump is such a great leader and negotiator that

1) Ds wanted $ for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan

So Rs said no you have to give us something on the border.

2) Ds said ok wel’ll let one of your most conservative senators co draft the most meaningful immigration bill in 20+ yrs w items Rs have been asking for but didn’t pass when they had WH, Senate and House and the Border Patrol said “please pass”

Only to have Trump tell Rs to kill it

Only to have Rs 2 months later bring up and pass …

that same $ for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan.

That really is some next level negotiating and kinda makes you understand how a casino owner can bankrupt his own casino.
4D Chess.
 
Flash Back. Aug 2020

Trump vows TikTok ban if no U.S. sale deal reached by Sept. 15​

By David Shepardson and Jeff Mason
August 3, 202012:33 PM CDTUpdated 4 years ago


WASHINGTON, Aug 3 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said Monday he does not oppose Microsoft Corp acquiring the U.S. operations of TikTok and said he will ban the service in the United States on Sept 15 without a sale.
The comments came after Trump Friday he said he was planning to ban the Chinese-owned video app's U.S. operations after dismissing a possible sale to Microsoft.


July 2020

Trump says he's banning TikTok in the U.S.​

"We're banning them from the United States," Trump said Friday night aboard Air Force One.


April 2024

1713887170672.png


Trump’s statement slamming Biden for the TikTok ban is a remarkable reversal for the former president, who issued an executive order in August 2020 banning TikTok absent a divestiture by ByteDance ― essentially the same policy now under consideration.

Executive Order on Addressing the Threat Posed by TikTok

INFRASTRUCTURE & TECHNOLOGY

Issued on: August 6, 2020
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that additional steps must be taken to deal with the national emergency with respect to the information and communications technology and services supply chain declared in Executive Order 13873 of May 15, 2019 (Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain). Specifically, the spread in the United States of mobile applications developed and owned by companies in the People’s Republic of China (China) continues to threaten the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. At this time, action must be taken to address the threat posed by one mobile application in particular, TikTok.

TikTok, a video-sharing mobile application owned by the Chinese company ByteDance Ltd., has reportedly been downloaded over 175 million times in the United States and over one billion times globally. TikTok automatically captures vast swaths of information from its users, including Internet and other network activity information such as location data and browsing and search histories. This data collection threatens to allow the Chinese Communist Party access to Americans’ personal and proprietary information — potentially allowing China to track the locations of Federal employees and contractors, build dossiers of personal information for blackmail, and conduct corporate espionage.

TikTok also reportedly censors content that the Chinese Communist Party deems politically sensitive, such as content concerning protests in Hong Kong and China’s treatment of Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities. This mobile application may also be used for disinformation campaigns that benefit the Chinese Communist Party, such as when TikTok videos spread debunked conspiracy theories about the origins of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus.

These risks are real. The Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration, and the United States Armed Forces have already banned the use of TikTok on Federal Government phones. The Government of India recently banned the use of TikTok and other Chinese mobile applications throughout the country; in a statement, India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology asserted that they were “stealing and surreptitiously transmitting users’ data in an unauthorized manner to servers which have locations outside India.” American companies and organizations have begun banning TikTok on their devices. The United States must take aggressive action against the owners of TikTok to protect our national security.

Accordingly, I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) The following actions shall be prohibited beginning 45 days after the date of this order, to the extent permitted under applicable law: any transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, with ByteDance Ltd. (a.k.a. Zìjié Tiàodòng), Beijing, China, or its subsidiaries, in which any such company has any interest, as identified by the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) under section 1(c) of this order.

(b) The prohibition in subsection (a) of this section applies except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order.

(c) 45 days after the date of this order, the Secretary shall identify the transactions subject to subsection (a) of this section.

Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate the prohibition set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 3. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;
(b) the term “entity” means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization; and

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 4. The Secretary is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement this order. The Secretary may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of Commerce. All departments and agencies of the United States shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

August 6, 2020.
 
Last edited:
Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker resumed his testimony on Tuesday as the first witness in former president Donald Trump’s “hush-money” criminal trial.
The relationship between Trump and Pecker began in the 1980s, when Trump began giving Pecker friendly advice on the celebrity social scene in New York, Pecker recalled. They spoke about The Apprentice numerous times and Trump fed Pecker information about the show that the National Enquirer published to mutual benefit, Pecker recollected.

When negative stories about Trump circulated, Pecker would notify Cohen after he joined Trump’s team in 2007, Pecker noted. His conversations with Cohen increased once Trump announced his presidential campaign, and Cohen invited Pecker to meet at Trump tower in August 2015.

“What I would do is I would run or publish positive stories about Mr. Trump and I would publish negative stories about his opponents and I said that I would also … be eyes and ears. I said I would be your eyes and ears,” Pecker said in relation to what he proposed at the meeting.

“Anything that I hear in the marketplace — if I hear anything negative about yourself or if I hear anything about women selling stories, I would notify Michael Cohen as I did over the last several years,” he continued.

“In a presidential campaign, I was the person that thought that there would be a lot of women would come out to try to sell their stories, because Mr. Trump was well known as the most eligible bachelor, and dated the most beautiful women.”

Pecker answered affirmatively to questions from the prosecution over whether he offered to publish positive stories on Trump and negative ones on his opponents.


“I think it was a mutual benefit. It would help his campaign, and it would also help me,” Pecker said.

The agreement with Trump was not in writing and “very confidential” because of the possibility of leaks, Pecker said. The prosecution presented National Enquirer headlines to the jury as evidence of the tabloid’s positive Trump coverage. Trump leaned in and squinted to get a better look at the positive headlines.

Pecker said Cohen had an informal role on the Trump campaign and circulated negative information on 2016 Republican primary opponents such as Senator Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Senator Marco Rubio (R., Fla.).

“Michael was physically in every aspect of whatever the campaign was working on, at least at Trump Organization at Trump Tower, at least when he was physically there,”
Pecker testified. The prosecution also showed the jury negative headlines about Trump’s opponents. Before the National Enquirer ran articles, he would send them to Cohen for him to review.


In October 2016, Trump introduced Pecker to top adviser Steve Bannon and Trump suggested the pair could “work very well together,” Pecker said. Trump’s defense attorneys objected to the prosecution’s line of questioning surrounding Bannon and noted Trump is not being charged with conspiracy.

Judge Merchan did not rule on whether Trump has violated the gag order he previously imposed barring the former president from publicly attacking prosecutors and jurors, saying Tuesday morning that he would issue a ruling later in the day.

Merchan did, however, scold Trump’s attorney for insisting that his client is “trying to comply” with the order.

“Mr. Blanche, you are losing all credibility with the court,” Merchan said.
 

Tabloid publisher testifies he canceled deal for Trump to buy story of alleged affair

NEW YORK (Reuters) -Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker testified at Donald Trump's criminal trial on Thursday that he worked out a deal that would allow Trump to buy the silence of a former Playboy model who said she had an affair with him, but called it off.

Pecker, 72, said he signed an agreement with Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to assign the rights to the woman's story to a shell company that would hide the fact that Trump's company was paying for it. He said he called off the deal after speaking with a company lawyer.


"Michael Cohen said, 'The boss is going to be very angry with you.' And I said, 'I'm sorry, I'm not going forward, the deal is off,'" Pecker testified.

"He was very angry, very upset, screaming, basically, at me," Pecker said of Cohen.

Pecker is a key witness in the case against the former U.S. president, who is accused of falsifying business records to cover up a hush-money payment to another woman who said she had a sexual encounter with Trump, porn star Stormy Daniels.

Prosecutors say Pecker, who has not been charged with a crime, engaged in a conspiracy with Trump and Cohen to corrupt the 2016 election by suppressing unflattering stories that might hurt Trump's candidacy.


Pecker testified that after former Playboy model Karen McDougal told his editor that she had a yearlong affair with Trump in 2006 and 2007, he advised Trump to buy her silence.

"He said, 'What do you think I should do?' I said, 'I think you should buy the story and take it off the market,'" Pecker testified.

Pecker said he told Cohen he did not want the Enquirer to pay for the story, as it had already paid $30,000 to buy the silence of a Trump Tower doorman who claimed Trump had fathered a child of out wedlock, which turned out not to be true.


He said the Enquirer's parent company, American Media, signed McDougal to a contract to publish fitness articles after Cohen promised Trump would pay for McDougal's story.

Pecker said Cohen set up a shell company to disguise any payment from Trump's company to American Media before Pecker backed out of the deal.


McDougal's story about the affair was never published - a practice known as "catch and kill" that is considered unethical by mainstream journalism outlets.

McDougal is expected to testify later in the trial.

Cohen is also expected to be a prominent witness. He has said he arranged a $130,000 payment to Daniels to keep quiet about a liaison she says she had with Trump in 2006. Prosecutors say Trump illegally falsified business records by disguising his reimbursement payments to Cohen as legal fees.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to 34 felony counts and denied having sex with Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford. He has also denied having an affair with McDougal.

Hush money payments themselves are not illegal, and Trump's lawyers have argued the Daniels payout was personal and unrelated to his campaign.

Prosecutors say the payment was a campaign expense that should have been disclosed, and that Trump’s arrangement with the Enquirer deceived voters by suppressing stories of alleged extramarital affairs at a time when he faced accusations of sexual misbehavior.


'ELECTORAL FRAUD'

Pecker testified that he did not notify federal election officials of the McDougal payment, even though he know that campaign expenditures made in coordination with candidates must be reported.

The Enquirer's editor, Dylan Howard, appeared to be aware of the conflict as well. "At least if he wins, I'll be pardoned for electoral fraud," Howard said in a text message presented by prosecutors. Lawyers argued whether that could be admitted as evidence.

The trial is the first of a former U.S. president and carries political risks for Trump as he prepares for a November election rematch with President Joe Biden and fends off three other criminal indictments, to which he has also pleaded not guilty.

As Trump watched Pecker testify in New York, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Trump's arguments that he is immune from prosecution for actions taken as president. Justice Juan Merchan denied Trump's request to attend the Supreme Court arguments.


"We have a big case today, the judge isn't allowing me to go," Trump said while visiting a construction site on Thursday morning.

Merchan has imposed a limited gag order on Trump that bars him from publicly attacking witnesses, jurors and other people close to the case, including court staff and their families.

Merchan has not yet ruled on a request by prosecutors to punish Trump for violating that order.

Trump has said the gag order violates his right to free speech and says he is being treated unfairly by Merchan.
 

Trump Discussed ‘Catch-and-Kill’ Scheme to Cover Up Affairs in Front of Then-FBI Director Comey, Ex-Tabloid Publisher Testifies

Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker resumed testifying on Thursday about the “catch-and-kill” process he used to bury former president Donald Trump’s alleged extramarital affairs, revealing for the first time that former FBI director James Comey may have been made aware of the scheme before Trump took office.


Addressing jurors in the Manhattan courtroom, prosecutors began the day by focusing on Pecker’s coordination with Trump and his former attorney Michael Cohen in 2016 to purchase a story from former Playboy model Karen McDougal, according to multiple reports.

A significant moment took place a few hours into Pecker’s testimony when he vividly recounted meeting with president-elect Trump, then-FBI Director James Comey, future Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, future White House chief of staff Reince Preibus, and future White House press secretary Sean Spicer in his office at Trump Tower.

Trump introduced Pecker to the attendees and thanked him for suppressing “embarrassing” stories that might otherwise crop up in the press, adding that he believed Trump was referring to the embarrassment the stories might cause to the Trump campaign, not Trump’s family, which was never mentioned.


Specifically, Trump thanked Pecker for “handling the McDougal situation,” the former tabloid publisher testified.

“I felt that he was thanking me for buying them, and for not publishing any of the stories. And for helping the way I did,” Pecker said.

It’s unclear exactly how Comey interpreted the comments or what he did with the information. Trump fired Comey, an Obama administration holdover, during the first year of his presidency after Comey chose not to prosecute Trump’s 2016 presidential rival Hillary Clinton for routinely using her personal email server for government communications when she was Obama’s secretary of state.

Comey made himself into a public figure and refused to clarify the nature of the FBI’s investigation into discredited claims of collusion between Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia. His falling out with Trump turned him into a hero among Democrats who previously thought Comey helped Trump by announcing the outcome of the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton ahead of the 2016 presidential election.


McDougal alleged that she and Trump had an extramarital, romantic relationship for a year. The National Enquirer‘s editor-in-chief Dylan Howard investigated the allegation in 2016 to explore the possibility of purchasing the story from her, Pecker recalled. Pecker previously testified that he and Cohen agreed McDougal’s allegations deserved to be vetted after Cohen initially denied them.

Howard told Pecker “he believed the story could be true, or was true, but she had no corroborating evidence,” Pecker testified on Thursday. She turned down a $10,000 offer from the National Enquirer to purchase the story, despite not wanting to have her story published. Cohen wanted the tabloid to buy McDougal’s story and Trump later called Pecker from an investors meeting in New Jersey to discuss it.

“What do you think I should do?” Trump asked, according to Pecker. He told Trump “I think you should buy the story and take it off the market.”


“I believed the story was true,” Pecker added. Cohen told Pecker Trump would “take care of” reimbursing the tabloid for buying the story, even though Pecker believed Cohen did not have authority to manage Trump’s funds.

Pecker was under the impression he would be reimbursed by Trump if the tabloid agreed to pay $150,000 for McDougal’s story. In August 2016, National Enquirer parent company American Media Inc. and McDougal agreed to a contract to buy the story and allow McDougal to write a monthly column in entertainment magazines.

“I wanted to have the contract be a record that stipulates that for the services that she was going to perform for American Media has a basis for it with $150,000,” Pecker said of the contract. The prosecution presented a $150,000 invoice to AMI from McDougal’s attorney Keith Davidson.

Pecker believed Trump and Cohen were aware of the McDougal contract. Howard and AMI’s general counsel also knew of it.


“Yes, I believe Donald Trump knew,” Pecker said. On August 10, 2016, five days after the contract was agreed upon, McDougal’s attorney sent her the payment. Pecker also answered affirmatively when the prosecution asked if he did not publish the story to ensure it did not influence the outcome of the 2016 election.

Merchan overruled objections from Trump’s defense attorney over questions to Pecker about the campaign-finance aspect of the McDougal payment. Pecker said he was aware the transaction was illegal and confirmed it was not disclosed in accordance with campaign finance laws.

“We didn’t want the story to embarrass Mr. Trump or embarrass or hurt the campaign,” Pecker stated, referring to himself and Cohen. In October 2016, Pecker’s agreement with Cohen for the reimbursement fell apart after the pair devised an agreement to assign to Cohen the rights to the McDougal story. The Wall Street Journal ended up reporting on the National Enquirer purchase in November 2016 and Trump’s campaign at the time denied any knowledge of the situation.


Later in the day, Pecker testified that Trump accused either he or Howard of leaking the story, and the National Enquirer amended its deal with McDougal giving her permission to speak to the press.

The prosecution is attempting to portray the McDougal story as part of a pattern by Trump involving payments to prevent the release of allegations he had an extramarital affair in order to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Trump is facing 34 felony charges for allegedly falsifying business records in connection with a $130,000 payment Cohen sent to porn actress Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 presidential election to stop her from going public with allegations she and Trump had an extramarital affair in 2006. Trump has denied Daniels’s allegations.

The former president is being charged for falsifying business records to cover up hush-money payments to Daniels in alleged violation of campaign-finance violations, a federal crime that the Justice Department has not pursued against Trump.


Trump’s legal team is simultaneously arguing his presidential immunity case before the Supreme Court. Before he entered the courtroom, Trump spoke to reporters about the presidential immunity case and criticized Merchan for not permitting him to go to oral arguments.

“We have a big case today this judge isn’t allowing me to go. We have a big case today at the Supreme Court on presidential immunity. A president has to have immunity if you don’t have immunity you just have a ceremonial president,” Trump said.
 
A Fed that is no longer independent but instead under the control of the politicians who are already doing their best to bankrupt us. Gee, what could go wrong?

Trump Allies Draw Up Plans to Blunt Fed’s Independence​

Some Trump advisers argue that the president should be consulted on interest-rate decisions​


WASHINGTON—Donald Trump’s allies are quietly drafting proposals that would attempt to erode the Federal Reserve’s independence if the former president wins a second term, in the midst of a deepening divide among his advisers over how aggressively to challenge the central bank’s authority.

Former Trump administration officials and other supporters of the presumptive GOP nominee have in recent months discussed a range of proposals, from incremental policy changes to a long-shot assertion that the president himself should play a role in setting interest rates. A small group of the president’s allies—whose work is so secretive that even some prominent former Trump economic aides weren’t aware of it—has produced a roughly 10-page document outlining a policy vision for the central bank, according to people familiar with the matter.

The group of Trump allies argues that he should be consulted on interest-rate decisions, and the draft document recommends subjecting Fed regulations to White House review and more forcefully using the Treasury Department as a check on the central bank. The group also contends that Trump, if he returns to the White House, would have the authority to oust Jerome Powell as Fed chair before his four-year term ends in 2026, the people familiar with the matter said, though Powell would likely remain on the Fed’s board of governors.
It couldn’t be determined whether Trump is aware of or signed off on the effort, but some people close to the discussions believe the work has received the blessing of the former president.
 
A Fed that is no longer independent but instead under the control of the politicians who are already doing their best to bankrupt us. Gee, what could go wrong?

Trump Allies Draw Up Plans to Blunt Fed’s Independence​

Some Trump advisers argue that the president should be consulted on interest-rate decisions​


WASHINGTON—Donald Trump’s allies are quietly drafting proposals that would attempt to erode the Federal Reserve’s independence if the former president wins a second term, in the midst of a deepening divide among his advisers over how aggressively to challenge the central bank’s authority.

Former Trump administration officials and other supporters of the presumptive GOP nominee have in recent months discussed a range of proposals, from incremental policy changes to a long-shot assertion that the president himself should play a role in setting interest rates. A small group of the president’s allies—whose work is so secretive that even some prominent former Trump economic aides weren’t aware of it—has produced a roughly 10-page document outlining a policy vision for the central bank, according to people familiar with the matter.

The group of Trump allies argues that he should be consulted on interest-rate decisions, and the draft document recommends subjecting Fed regulations to White House review and more forcefully using the Treasury Department as a check on the central bank. The group also contends that Trump, if he returns to the White House, would have the authority to oust Jerome Powell as Fed chair before his four-year term ends in 2026, the people familiar with the matter said, though Powell would likely remain on the Fed’s board of governors.
It couldn’t be determined whether Trump is aware of or signed off on the effort, but some people close to the discussions believe the work has received the blessing of the former president.
Getting rid of Jerome Powell is not a good idea.

And agree having the President be more involved with the Fed is a horrible idea.
 
Back
Top