Trump 47

[TheMonkey]

The language of the 22nd amendment is clear and not ambiguous. No President can be elected more than two terms, That should have been a lay-up answer for that judicial nominee. Conservative judges have typically been the ones with a stricter reading of the Constitution and Liberal judges more with the interpretation.
There is no way to even interpret the Constitution allows Trump to be elected to office again (or any backdrop way for him to remain President after 2028).
No Senator should vote for this nominee.

And these nominees were obviously coached in their responses. Does that indicate a strategy?

 

[Polds4OSU]

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

 

[TheMonkey]

No wonder I am not only idiot left around here that is stupid enough to interact with you.

Preparing myself for this mantra.

 

[steross]

The language of the 22nd amendment is clear and not ambiguous. No President can be elected more than two terms, That should have been a lay-up answer for that judicial nominee. Conservative judges have typically been the ones with a stricter reading of the Constitution and Liberal judges more with the interpretation.
There is no way to even interpret the Constitution allows Trump to be elected to office again (or any backdrop way for him to remain President after 2028).
No Senator should vote for this nominee.

Did you notice, he opened it up to all of the nominees and not a single one would support the constitution over the wannabe dictator?
This wasn't a lousy nominee. This disregard of the constitution was a REQUIREMENT to be selected by this president.

THAT is why we can't just look at Trump based on if we like certain policies or not like most of us have before. There is no president in our history that has demanded that type of control. It is dangerous to the nation.

 

[Polds4OSU]

IE if you don't report the news MY WAY then you are a traitor.

But lets go ahead and tone down that rhetoric of calling this guy a Fascists

Trump Says New York Times, CNN Are ‘Seditious’ for Iran Reporting in Latest News Media Attack​

link via Yahoo News https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-says-york-times-cnn-233205493.html

 

[steross]

And these nominees were obviously coached in their responses. Does that indicate a strategy?

Obviously they were vetted so that they are only selecting Trump syncophants.

Look at this scenario, what if one said: "As a federal judge, the 22nd amendment is clear and I would rule that no person can have a 3rd term until our constitution has changed."
Not only would that be the correct answer, it would secure the democrat votes. What is a republican supposed to do, vote against a judicial nominee for supporting the constitution? What is Trump supposed to do, withdraw the nomination for supporting the constitution?
If that person was a true conservative republican, that is the answer. You can stay true to your beliefs, and almost assure your nomination.

But, not a single one of these people are true conservative republicans. They proved they are Trump syncophants. They will risk their nomination to stay loyal to the person, not the republic.

 

[TheMonkey]

Did you notice, he opened it up to all of the nominees and not a single one would support the constitution over the wannabe dictator?
This wasn't a lousy nominee. This disregard of the constitution was a REQUIREMENT to be selected by this president.

THAT is why we can't just look at Trump based on if we like certain policies or not like most of us have before. There is no president in our history that has demanded that type of control. It is dangerous to the nation.

Careful now. You’re dancing close to “he’s a threat to democracy” territory here. That might incite violence.

 

[Polds4OSU]

 

[cowboyinexile]

Obviously they were vetted so that they are only selecting Trump syncophants.

Look at this scenario, what if one said: "As a federal judge, the 22nd amendment is clear and I would rule that no person can have a 3rd term until our constitution has changed."
Not only would that be the correct answer, it would secure the democrat votes. What is a republican supposed to do, vote against a judicial nominee for supporting the constitution? What is Trump supposed to do, withdraw the nomination for supporting the constitution?
If that person was a true conservative republican, that is the answer. You can stay true to your beliefs, and almost assure your nomination.

But, not a single one of these people are true conservative republicans. They proved they are Trump syncophants. They will risk their nomination to stay loyal to the person, not the republic.

It would make more sense for them to lie and do what they want once they have the appointment. The administration is so incompetent they can't even play the game they should be able to play right.

 

[Verbal]

View attachment 20472

How long before

 

[cowboyinexile]

How long before

Depends on how far the market drops. Guys need to be able to buy the dip after all.