SAVE act

[CowboyJD]

Would it be a federal offense if you sold it to someone who is prohibited from having it?

If I know or have reasonable cause to believe they are prohibited from having it and provide it, it is a violation of both state and federal law.

Felony under federal law. Misdemeanor under Oklahoma law.

 

[steross]

Again, you have to possess a valid ID 1st before you can purchase a firearm.

It isn't and never will be easier to get a firearm than to register to vote.

And yes the SAVE Act should create a system.

No, the SAVE act should not exist at all. In the past, we had a conservative party that fought against big federal government coming in and creating a bunch of stupid laws to fight problems that do not exist. The states are charged by the constitution with ensuring we have appropriate voting. There is NO EVIDENCE of significant non-citizen voting. Therefore the states have been doing the job so there is no reason for this liberal federal law.

And you have to have a spcific ID to register to vote. That is harder than just having an ID.

 

[CowboyJD]

I'm against the current SAVE Act because there is not enough system in place.

The Schumer meme is still ridiculous.

Fair enough, though I don’t think the Schumer meme is as ridiculous as you say it is. Hyperbolic to try and make a point? Sure.

 

[PF5]

Do Documentary Proof of Citizenship Requirements Disadvantage One Party More Than the Other? • Bipartisan Policy Center

Analysis of the SAVE America Act and documentary proof of citizenship requirements shows that about 12% of registered voters lack common qualifying documents, with disparities across party affiliation, income, education, and race. These findings highlight potential impacts on voter access under...

bipartisanpolicy.org