Trump 47

I bet probably most of the sorry watch buyers were people Trump was thinking of back years ago when he possibly said behind closed doors something like, "I can't believe it. All I was doing when I was trying to make a point was to be sarcastic or only joking around but feedback has it they actually believed every word I said. But by golly, I'm going to try to milk them for all they're worth!"

https://www.thedailybeast.com/furious-maga-customers-say-they-got-scammed-by-trump-watches/
 
Just some more mass murder committed by this administration, bombing boats in Venezuela.

This should get more attention. We have a president starting a war without any input from congress. What happens if Venezuela starts showing pictures of children they say were on the boats? Whar happens if they retaliate?

Im 100% sure there are drug being imported into the country from Venezuela (and a bunch of other countries) this way. But right now, to my knowledge all we have to go on is the administration saying take our word for it with the boats that have been torpedoed. At least share sensitive intel with a bipartisan group in congress so they can say if the actions are justified or not.
 
And now, there are talks of giving Argentina $40billion instead of 20. I wonder what $40billion could do for Americans?
Trump also put strings on that money today too..saying if this Wanna Be mini dictator didn't win reelection that the US would pull all that money and their economy would crash


So Trump now trying to get him reelected via bribing the whole country and their voters in our national television
 
So you are okay with tit for tat …as long as you think it is the Democrats that acted afterward??? C’mon. First, that is horrible to parse actions and be okay with one, but not the other (more of its (d)ifferent). This is just more hypocrisy (that would be like MAGA being okay with Trump going after Letitia James, but mad she went after him) .
But second, for this redistricting issue it shows you know little of very recent history, and how it plays into the North Carolina issue.

The Democrats formed the National Democratic Redistricting Commission in 2017 —- with Eric Holder as the Chair and Obama publicly stating he would be involved. The Republicans quickly launched the National Republican Redistricting Trust later that same year in response.

The NDRC has a history of filing lawsuits against state’s district maps (in 2021 against Ohio and North Carolina among others…..hmmm - wonder why NC is trying to redistrict).

Sounds like the NDRC first punched North Carolina in the face and now North Carolina is punching back. So, can we all assume that at least for North Carolina that you are on North Carolina’s side?

Calling a response to a harm "tit for tat' may make you feel superior, but it simply shows dearth of realistic thought about the subject.

Google AI can tell you how your post is wrong better than I can. Bold/underline is mine to show you how your partisan self simply cannot see the truth. I used to be a republican defending republicans until Trump came and made them indefensible, but the true MAGAs stick with it. And, the democrats can be bad, they just aren't nearly as bad as you MAGAs:

AI Overview


The National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC) was founded in 2017 by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and supported by former President Barack Obama
. Its mission is to combat partisan gerrymandering and influence the redistricting process to create fairer electoral maps.

Formation and purpose

  • Response to 2010 redistricting: The NDRC was created in direct response to Republican successes in the 2010 midterm elections. This gave the GOP control over the redistricting process in many states, which led to maps that favored Republican candidates.
  • Centralized hub: The NDRC serves as a central hub for the Democratic Party's redistricting strategy. It coordinates legal action, fundraising, and grassroots organizing.
  • Affiliated organizations: The NDRC is the political action committee (PAC) within a network of organizations that also includes the National Redistricting Foundation (501(c)(3)) for litigation and the National Redistricting Action Fund (501(c)(4)) for advocacy.
 
Back
Top