Trump 47

I bet probably most of the sorry watch buyers were people Trump was thinking of back years ago when he possibly said behind closed doors something like, "I can't believe it. All I was doing when I was trying to make a point was to be sarcastic or only joking around but feedback has it they actually believed every word I said. But by golly, I'm going to try to milk them for all they're worth!"

https://www.thedailybeast.com/furious-maga-customers-say-they-got-scammed-by-trump-watches/
 
Just some more mass murder committed by this administration, bombing boats in Venezuela.

This should get more attention. We have a president starting a war without any input from congress. What happens if Venezuela starts showing pictures of children they say were on the boats? Whar happens if they retaliate?

Im 100% sure there are drug being imported into the country from Venezuela (and a bunch of other countries) this way. But right now, to my knowledge all we have to go on is the administration saying take our word for it with the boats that have been torpedoed. At least share sensitive intel with a bipartisan group in congress so they can say if the actions are justified or not.
 
And now, there are talks of giving Argentina $40billion instead of 20. I wonder what $40billion could do for Americans?
Trump also put strings on that money today too..saying if this Wanna Be mini dictator didn't win reelection that the US would pull all that money and their economy would crash


So Trump now trying to get him reelected via bribing the whole country and their voters in our national television
 
So you are okay with tit for tat …as long as you think it is the Democrats that acted afterward??? C’mon. First, that is horrible to parse actions and be okay with one, but not the other (more of its (d)ifferent). This is just more hypocrisy (that would be like MAGA being okay with Trump going after Letitia James, but mad she went after him) .
But second, for this redistricting issue it shows you know little of very recent history, and how it plays into the North Carolina issue.

The Democrats formed the National Democratic Redistricting Commission in 2017 —- with Eric Holder as the Chair and Obama publicly stating he would be involved. The Republicans quickly launched the National Republican Redistricting Trust later that same year in response.

The NDRC has a history of filing lawsuits against state’s district maps (in 2021 against Ohio and North Carolina among others…..hmmm - wonder why NC is trying to redistrict).

Sounds like the NDRC first punched North Carolina in the face and now North Carolina is punching back. So, can we all assume that at least for North Carolina that you are on North Carolina’s side?

Calling a response to a harm "tit for tat' may make you feel superior, but it simply shows dearth of realistic thought about the subject.

Google AI can tell you how your post is wrong better than I can. Bold/underline is mine to show you how your partisan self simply cannot see the truth. I used to be a republican defending republicans until Trump came and made them indefensible, but the true MAGAs stick with it. And, the democrats can be bad, they just aren't nearly as bad as you MAGAs:

AI Overview


The National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC) was founded in 2017 by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and supported by former President Barack Obama
. Its mission is to combat partisan gerrymandering and influence the redistricting process to create fairer electoral maps.

Formation and purpose

  • Response to 2010 redistricting: The NDRC was created in direct response to Republican successes in the 2010 midterm elections. This gave the GOP control over the redistricting process in many states, which led to maps that favored Republican candidates.
  • Centralized hub: The NDRC serves as a central hub for the Democratic Party's redistricting strategy. It coordinates legal action, fundraising, and grassroots organizing.
  • Affiliated organizations: The NDRC is the political action committee (PAC) within a network of organizations that also includes the National Redistricting Foundation (501(c)(3)) for litigation and the National Redistricting Action Fund (501(c)(4)) for advocacy.
 
Supercut of comments from Republicans today alone about the No Kings rallies taking place this weekend. This has to be some of the worst, and most anti-American, coordinated messaging of all time.

 
The San Francisco Chronicle has confirmed reporting that the Trump Administration is planning to use Navy ships off the California coast to fire missiles into Camp Pendleton as a show of force this weekend.

 

‘Quote the President … Go to Jail’: Man Who Posted Meme Using Trump’s Exact Words Is Held on $2M Bond After Claim It Was ‘Threat of Mass Violence’​


A Tennessee man was jailed on a $2 million bond after being accused of inciting violence by posting memes of President Donald Trump and slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk in a Facebook group where members were organizing a vigil for Kirk.

According to The Tennessean, 61-year-old Larry Bushart, Jr. was charged with threats of mass violence on school property and activities after posting the images in the Perry County community group, where a local vigil for Kirk was being arranged.

One of the memes is an image of Trump with a direct quote from the president that reads, “We have to get over it.”

The president made that statement after a school shooting in January 2024 in Perry, Iowa, that claimed the life of one person and injured seven others.

Bushart, a former police officer, also captioned his post with, “This seems relevant today.”

Members of the Facebook group thought otherwise and reported Bushart under the ostensible assumption that he was making threats against Perry County High School, where last year’s mass shooting took place.

“This led teachers, parents and students to conclude he was talking about a hypothetical shooting at our school,” Perry County Sheriff Nick Weems said, adding that “numerous” people reached out to local authorities “in concern.”

Weems continued, “Investigators believe Bushart was fully aware of the fear his post would cause and intentionally sought to create hysteria within the community.”

The meme Bushart used has been posted countless times across social media since January 2024, typically in anti-Trump advertisements or by gun violence prevention activists.


In the weeks since Kirk’s death, people have reported being fired or suspended from their jobs for critical posts about Kirk.

Bushart is one of the first to face criminal charges for his unsympathetic post about the commentator. His bond was set at $2 million, according to local reports.

Some argued that authorities went too far and that his arrest represents an infringement of his First Amendment rights. However, police maintain that his post represented threatening speech and charged him under a state law passed in July 2024 that makes it a Class E felony to make threats against schools.

That law has reportedly faced intense scrutiny for blanket language that could conflict with Supreme Court precedent set in the 2023 Counterman v. Colorado ruling, according to The Tennessean.

The court determined that a “true threat,” which refers to threatening language not protected by the First Amendment, requires proof that the speaker consciously disregarded a “substantial risk” that their speech would trigger fear or harm others. The ruling states that the recklessness of the speech must be assessed by the speaker’s awareness of the risk, and not the listener’s perception of the threat.

more

“Creating mass hysteria in our community will not be tolerated,” Weems said, per WSMV. “We will continue to act quickly and decisively to protect our students and our citizens.”

“However, much offense it caused, there’s no serious argument it was a threat. It’s hard to see the arrest and charges as anything but politically motivated.,” one Aaron Terr, Director of Public Advocacy with Fire.org. His colleague followed up with, “Quote the President of the United States, go to jail.”
 
Supercut of comments from Republicans today alone about the No Kings rallies taking place this weekend. This has to be some of the worst, and most anti-American, coordinated messaging of all time.

They are nonchalantly telling their supporters that it's ok to do harm to the protestors. If the opposition hates America, and we view them as less than human, it's ok to harm.

I have no doubt there will be violence this weekend. Some MAGA idiot will drive his truck through a crowd, or start shooting. Not to mention the ones planted there who will throw bricks through windows (like what the FBI did in 2020).
 

Top U.S. admiral Alvin Holsey quits after failed Venezuela strikes — surviving targets spark military scandal​


A senior U.S. Navy officer overseeing aerial attacks on Venezuelan waters has stepped down amid reports that some targeted boats survived recent strikes. Admiral Alvin Holsey, a 37-year veteran of the Navy, will retire by the end of the year, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced on social media platform X.

Admiral Holsey Retires After Controversial Strike Operations​

Hegseth praised Holsey’s career, noting that he commanded helicopter squadrons, led Carrier Strike Group One, and helped establish the International Maritime Security Construct. “Admiral Holsey has demonstrated unwavering commitment to mission, people, and nation,” Hegseth wrote.

Holsey’s recent position was expected to last three years, but he served less than a year, according to reports from the New York Times. While the Navy did not provide a detailed reason for his early retirement, sources suggest Holsey may have had reservations about U.S. operations in Central and South America that targeted non-military vessels.


The timing of Holsey’s departure comes as U.S. strikes in the Caribbean reportedly left some intended targets alive. Officials confirmed that at least 27 people have been killed in these operations in recent weeks. One strike on Thursday left survivors, though their identities and conditions remain unclear, Reuters reported.
 

Pirro loses misdemeanor assault trial after failing three times to get felony indictment​


U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro's office failed to secure a misdemeanor conviction against a woman after also failing three attempts to have grand juries indict her on felony assault charges.

In July, Pirro's office accused Sydney Lori Reid, 44, of assaulting FBI agent Eugenia Bates while she was assisting ICE officer Vincent Liang, who was waiting to arrest two people outside of DC Jail. FBI agent Liang grabbed Reid as she was filming and pushed her against a wall.


"During Reid's active resistance to being detained, the FBI agent's hand was injured from striking and scraping the cement wall causing lacerations while the FBI agent was assisting ICE ERO officers," a press release from the Department of Justice said in July.

After failing to secure felony indictments from grand juries, Reid was charged with assault. But the prosecution's case was plagued by evidence problems during the trial.


Bates spent much of her three days on the stand explaining text messages that downplayed her injuries and described Reid as a "libtard." The final text messages turned over on Wednesday morning did not include what defense attorneys said was "the most damning one."

"You should be livid that the government brought this case," assistant federal public defender Tezira Abe told the jury. "They overplayed their hand on this one."

The jury found Reid not guilty after less than two hours of deliberation.
 
Back
Top