Trump 47

Please don't think that any of the "but trump" in this content is directed specifically at you. I've researched some of the following rant and everything I checked is spot on. So fire away at the untruths as ye see them.



"So now we are mad about a plane?

Qatar might gift the United States a Boeing 747. And somehow, the internet has decided that Donald Trump is about to park it in his backyard like it’s his new toy. They’re throwing around buzzwords like corruption and emoluments and acting like he’s about to fly off with classified documents in a jet wrapped in gold.

Let’s be clear, if Qatar does give this plane, it wouldn’t be to Trump personally. It would go to the U.S. government, just like dozens of high dollar gifts from foreign nations have for years under every administration. This isn’t new. It’s literally outlined in federal law.

But, if we’re going to throw a fit over foreign gifts, we should at least be consistent about it.

People aren’t mad because a country wants to gift America a plane. They’re mad because it’s Trump. If this exact same situation were happening under any other president, especially one with a “D” next to their name, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. You’d hear words like “diplomacy,” “honor,” and “prestigious partnership.”

But Trump? Felon!
You want to talk about foreign gifts? Let’s talk.
Every sitting president since even before Clinton have received high dollar gifts, some considered ceremonial and often symbolic. That’s what happens when you’re the leader of the free world. Other countries send gifts, it’s tradition, and it’s all laid out in the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act.

That law says if a gift is valued over a few hundred bucks (right now it’s $480), it doesn’t belong to the president. It gets documented and becomes government property. Unless, of course, the official wants to buy it at fair market value. And yes, the State Department puts all of this on public record. There’s even a report every year listing what was given, who gave it, how much it was worth, and where it ended up.

It’s public and definitely not newsworthy… until Trump’s name shows up.

You know what Barack Obama got? A ruby and diamond jewelry set from the Saudi king worth over $130,000. It was recorded, reported, and handed over to the National Archives. That’s how this works.

George W. Bush got gold watches and swords and fancy decorations from Middle Eastern leaders too. So did Bill Clinton. Nobody freaked out. Nobody accused them of being owned by foreign powers.

And then there’s Jill Biden.

In 2023, during a state visit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India gifted her a 7.5-carat lab grown diamond. Valued at $20,000.
A spokesperson said it would be “used in the East Wing” and then turned over to the National Archives after they left office.

Well, they left office in January… and here we are, months later, and there’s still no record of that diamond ever making it to the archives.

So where is it?

Funny how no one’s shouting about that. No social media rage posts or lawsuits or think pieces on potential abuse of power. Just silence.

You know why?
Because we haven’t been told to be outraged.
That’s the truth of it. No one’s mad because no one’s been instructed to be mad. If Trump says he enjoys breathing and it’s his favorite hobby, someone on the left will accuse him of using too much oxygen and they’ll threaten impeachment. But a diamond worth twenty grand goes missing? Crickets.

A $20,000 diamond is fine. But a plane, gifted to the government, not the man, has everyone screaming again.

Again I ask, Why?

Because Trump is the only president people are allowed to hate openly and without any nuance. They’ve decided everything he touches is corrupt by default. So now, even if he follows the rules, even if the gift isn’t for him, and even if there’s no proof of wrongdoing, he’s still guilty. Because he might benefit in some way. Possibly.

That’s not justice. That’s obsession.

Look, I’m not saying you have to like the guy. I’m not even saying you have to agree with his politics or vote for him. What I am saying is that the rules don’t change just because it’s him. If we’re going to scrutinize gifts from foreign leaders, let’s do it across the board.

Let’s demand transparency about the diamond. Let’s ask where all those flashy items from past administrations ended up. Let’s pull the gift reports and dig through them line by line. Because right now, this isn’t about ethics. It’s about politics. And it’s about using outrage as a weapon and hoping no one notices how one sided the anger really is.

People want to bring up the Constitution? Great! The Emoluments Clause states no federal official can accept gifts from foreign states without the consent of Congress. But that clause has been tested and clarified over and over again. That’s exactly why the Foreign Gifts Act exists, to regulate these things so officials don’t violate the Constitution.

The Qatar plane, if it’s accepted, has to go through official channels. Just like Obama’s jewelry did. Just like Bush’s gifts did. Just like every item that exceeds the federal threshold. And yes, that includes diamonds.

The problem is, when it’s a Democrat in office, the media wraps it up in a bow and calls it tradition. When it’s Trump, they throw gasoline on it and call it corruption. You can’t change the rules depending on who’s wearing the title. You can’t call it diplomacy when your side does it and criminal activity when someone else does.

It doesn’t matter if it’s a plane, a sword, or a sparkly rock. A gift is a gift. If it’s handled properly and documented, reported, and transferred then we’re done here. Unless we’re going to start dragging every administration through the same mud and questioning everyone’s foreign gifts. Which, honestly, I wouldn’t mind seeing. Fair is fair.

But let’s not pretend this is about a plane or act like we suddenly care about legal loopholes or government ethics. Because if we did, we’d be just as loud about a $20,000 diamond still unaccounted for months after the Bidens left office. We’d be questioning where that gift went and asking why it hasn’t shown up in the National Archives.

Instead, all the anger and suspicion gets laser focused on one man because people would rather fight him in the court of public opinion than admit he’s done more in the last 100 days than our previous administration.

We don’t have to agree on the man. But we should at least agree on the principle. We either care about accountability or we don’t.

So if you’re going to be outraged about the plane, fine. Be outraged. Just make sure you’re still mad when someone gets a diamond. Or a sword. Or a royal carpet with their face woven into it.

If we’re gonna keep pretending this is about ethics, then the least we can do is treat everyone the same.

EDIT:

So after looking into it more, I was honestly shocked to find out our current Air Force One planes are over 35 years old. They’ve been flying since the early 1990s. No wonder maintenance is so expensive, parts are harder to find, systems are outdated, and the thing guzzles fuel.

There are already two replacement planes in the works, same 747 models that Qatar’s offering but that project’s been delayed over and over again. Latest update has them coming around 2027, possibly.

Now yes, retrofitting a plane to meet Air Force One standards is expensive. It’s not just new paint and furniture; it’s military grade tech, secure communications, defensive systems. But… we’ve already been doing this since 2017. Those two new planes were bought years ago, and we’ve been sinking money into them ever since. They’ll be over a decade old before they’re even done, because the budget keeps getting kicked around and pushed to other priorities.

So why are we mad now? Because Qatar might gift a similar plane? That’s what I mean when I say it’s all smoke and mirrors. Get people riled up over something without mentioning that the exact same thing is already happening, quietly, behind the scenes and has been for years.

And also worth noting, money for Air Force One replacements was already budgeted through the Department of Defense, so complaining over the cost kind of falls apart.

And to be honest, we probably won’t even need the Qatar plane. It was offered, not accepted. We are mad about hypotheticals.

Meanwhile, we’ve already spent billions on the two that are waiting for their final upgrades, but nobody’s yelling about that. Just outrage on cue because of who they think might benefit from the optics."

From my standpoint, it is all about what happens to the plane when he is done. If he is accepting it on the part of the US government, then the US government should be determining what happens to the plane. My understanding is that he is saying the plane will go to his presidential library. If the US government believes that is the best use of a $400million dollar plane, then fine. But, if he is deciding that, not fine. The optics are all Trump's fault. If he would not have just said it would be stupid for him not to accept the gift, and also talked about continuing to use plane after he departs the White House, then it would not be a controversy. All he would have had to say to end any controversy is "I will only accept this gift on behalf of the US government following all laws and protocols of the government and it will be the government's plane."

Jill Biden's diamond thing is stupid. There is a state department gift report. Does the author think she is just going to criminally keep it? Did they take a look at how long it typically takes to catalogue gifts for the archives? Most administrations take around a year after leaving office to catalogue gifts.
 
Last edited:
From my standpoint, it is all about what happens to the plane when he is done. If he is accepting it on the part of the US government, then the US government should be determining what happens to the plane. My understanding is that he is saying the plane will go to his presidential library. If the US government believes that is the best use of a $400million dollar plane, then fine. But, if he is deciding that, not fine. The optics are all Trump's fault. If he would not have just said it would be stupid for him not to accept the gift, and also talked about continuing to use plane after he departs the White House, then it would not be a controversy. All he would have had to say to end any controversy is "I will only accept this gift on behalf of the US government following all laws and protocols of the government and it will be the government's plane."

Jill Biden's diamond thing is stupid. There is a state department gift report. Does the author think she is just going to criminally keep it? Did they take a look at how long it typically takes to catalogue gifts for the archives? Most administrations take around a year after leaving office to catalogue gifts.
Why not do it like the Statue of Liberty and open it to Congressional approval via vote with stipulations in writing it will be donated to the archives after .

I would accept that 100% when it passed Congress
 
From my standpoint, it is all about what happens to the plane when he is done. If he is accepting it on the part of the US government, then the US government should be determining what happens to the plane. My understanding is that he is saying the plane will go to his presidential library. If the US government believes that is the best use of a $400million dollar plane, then fine. But, if he is deciding that, not fine. The optics are all Trump's fault. If he would not have just said it would be stupid for him not to accept the gift, and also talked about continuing to use plane after he departs the White House, then it would not be a controversy. All he would have had to say to end any controversy is "I will only accept this gift on behalf of the US government following all laws and protocols of the government and it will be the government's plane."

Jill Biden's diamond thing is stupid. There is a state department gift report. Does the author think she is just going to criminally keep it? Did they take a look at how long it typically takes to catalogue gifts for the archives? Most administrations take around a year after leaving office to catalogue gifts.
Also….It’ll be more than a $400 million plane after all the upgrades that will be made.

And nobody knows how long that will take.

Depending upon how long that takes, we could see the plane being used by the government for a very short time before being turned over to the personal control of Trump.
 
From my standpoint, it is all about what happens to the plane when he is done. If he is accepting it on the part of the US government, then the US government should be determining what happens to the plane. My understanding is that he is saying the plane will go to his presidential library. If the US government believes that is the best use of a $400million dollar plane, then fine. But, if he is deciding that, not fine. The optics are all Trump's fault. If he would not have just said it would be stupid for him not to accept the gift, and also talked about continuing to use plane after he departs the White House, then it would not be a controversy. All he would have had to say to end any controversy is "I will only accept this gift on behalf of the US government following all laws and protocols of the government and it will be the government's plane."

Jill Biden's diamond thing is stupid. There is a state department gift report. Does the author think she is just going to criminally keep it? Did they take a look at how long it typically takes to catalogue gifts for the archives? Most administrations take around a year after leaving office to catalogue gifts.
The gifts are catalogued when presented. She is to return them or purchase for value when they leave office. I don't know how long they have to return/purchase them, but the gift is registered and not returned/purchased at this time.


Doesn't seem very prudent to store luxury jumbo jet at a presidential museum or the national archives so my guess is it would be given over to the government/military after his term.
 
Last edited:
Also….It’ll be more than a $400 million plane after all the upgrades that will be made.

And nobody knows how long that will take.

Depending upon how long that takes, we could see the plane being used by the government for a very short time before being turned over to the personal control of Trump.
That was all covered in the rant I posted...
 
The gifts are catalogued when presented. She is to return them or purchase for value when they leave office. I don't know how long they have to return/purchase them, but the gift is registered and not returned/purchased at this time.


Doesn't seem very prudent to store luxury jumbo jet at a presidential museum or the national archives so my guess is it would be given over to the government/military after his term.
Does Trump and this administration strike you as giving a #$&* about what would be “prudent” in their dealings?

Sure as heck doesn’t strike me that way.

But that's not what was said is it?

"Qatar calls it a "loan" to the U.S. government while Trump is president. And Attorney General Pam Bondi said accepting the plane is legal because it will be handed over to Trump's presidential library before his term ends. "

But Rob guesses that they wouldn’t do exactly what they said they would do.

So it’s all good.

That was all covered in the rant I posted...
It wasn’t “covered” it was hand waved away as something we shouldn’t consider or be worried about.
 
Last edited:
The gifts are catalogued when presented. She is to return them or purchase for value when they leave office. I don't know how long they have to return/purchase them, but the gift is registered and not returned/purchased at this time.


Doesn't seem very prudent to store luxury jumbo jet at a presidential museum or the national archives so my guess is it would be given over to the government/military after his term.
No, a State Department Gift report is made when the gift is presented. It is catalogued when it arrives at the National Archives. The gift report states that it is in use. 4 months is nothing unusual at all, and the article is making a stupid insinuation in a very weak attempt at a whataboutism.
 
Does Trump and this administration strike you as giving a #$&* about what would be “prudent” in their dealings?

Sure as heck doesn’t strike me that way.


But Rob guesses that they wouldn’t do exactly what they said they would do.

So it’s all good.


It wasn’t “covered” it was hand waved away as something we should consider or be worried about.
And you really think it will just be handed over to Trump when he leaves office.

Cmon man. The dude didn't get rich by being transparent, if he planned on keeping a $400M plane he'd have had them donate it to one of his holdings. Even Biden was smarter than that....maybe.
 
Do you really think they're going to park it at the presidential library.
Do you really think they won’t?

Even though that’s what Bondi said?

FWIW, I don’t think he’ll park it at the Presidential Library.

I think he’ll use it for what he’ll call “Presidential Library business” to try to justify it.

And you’ll shrug your shoulders and be okay with it.
 
And you really think it will just be handed over to Trump when he leaves office.

Cmon man. The dude didn't get rich by being transparent, if he planned on keeping a $400M plane he'd have had them donate it to one of his holdings. Even Biden was smarter than that....maybe.

There were a bunch of times during Trump's first term where he wanted to do something and someone in his cabinet told him not to because it was illegal.

He doesn't have nearly as many people around him now telling him what he can and can't do. Do you really think hes worried about trying to hide something when he is being told he can do whatever he wants?
 
Do you really think they won’t?

Even though that’s what Bondi said?

FWIW, I don’t think he’ll park it at the Presidential Library.

I think he’ll use it for what he’ll call “Presidential Library business” to try to justify it.

And you’ll shrug your shoulders and be okay with it.
Ugh Frustrated GIF by Equipe de France de Football



As was insinuated in the post. It's going out of your collective way to be outraged.

Be outraged over Walmart using tariffs as an excuse to raise prices on EVERYTHING before the tariffs even start.

IMG_0972.jpg
 
And you really think it will just be handed over to Trump when he leaves office.

Cmon man. The dude didn't get rich by being transparent, if he planned on keeping a $400M plane he'd have had them donate it to one of his holdings. Even Biden was smarter than that....maybe.
The dude got rich by being corrupt and a con man.

Why wouldn’t I think it would just be handed over to Trump when he leaves office?

He’s enriching himself left and right making side deals with the same folks that are “donating” the plane.

And he’s exempt from prosecution for supposedly official acts done while he is President.
 

Trump’s AG: It will be given to the Presidential library at the end of his term.

Trump: I won’t use it personally after it’s given to my Presidential library.

Rob: My guess is they won’t do that. It wouldn’t be prudent.

The mental gymnastics you’re going through right now are pretty impressive, bro.
 
Back
Top