Trump 47

[Rob B.]

So we end protected status for all of them?

Guilt by association based only upon same nationality?

Based on the same lack of protocol that got them here....so no, not ONLY.

But I'm sure if one white, "nazi", South African plots a terrorist attack, some here will want them all executed...

 

[CowboyJD]

Breaking news: President Donald Trump announced the United States will be removing all sanctions against Syria.

“I will be ordering the cessation of sanctions against Syria in order to give them a chance at greatness,” Trump said.

The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) on Threads

Breaking news: President Donald Trump announced the United States will be removing all sanctions against Syria. “I will be ordering the cessation of sanctions against Syria in order to give them a chance at greatness,” Trump said.

www.threads.com

I wonder how much MAGA bitcoin Syria bought.

 

[mugatu]

But I'm sure if one white, "nazi", South African plots a terrorist attack, some here will want them all executed...

... maybe you will but I sure won't.

 

[CowboyJD]

Based on the same lack of protocol that got them here....so no, not ONLY.

But I'm sure if one white, "nazi", South African plots a terrorist attack, some here will want them all executed...

Your gonna have to prove “the same lack of protocol” with…you know….facfs.

Otherwise you’re just aping MAGA talking points.

And “based upon the same protocols” is the very definition of guilt by association.

They missed one….so ship them all out.

And your second sentence is complete and utter nonsense and playing the reverse “race card”.

 

[mugatu]

I wonder how much MAGA bitcoin Syria bought.

Maybe but they also are proposing to do a Trump tower. Build something with his name is definitely a way to win him over.

 

[Verbal]

Maybe but they also are proposing to do a Trump tower. Build something with his name is definitely a way to win him over.

And most likely pay him a royalty to use the name. Trumps two biggest loves 1a) himself 1b) making himself richer.

 

[Rob B.]

Your gonna have to prove “the same lack of protocol” with…you know….facfs.

Otherwise you’re just aping MAGA talking points.

And your second sentence is complete and utter nonsense and playing the reverse “race card”.

Chairman Green Presses DHS, FBI on Failure to Fully Vet Afghan National Charged with Plotting Election Day Terrorist Attack, & Increased ISIS-Related Threats – Committee on Homeland Security

homeland.house.gov

My second sentence is completely based on the comments in this thread.

 

[cowboyinexile]

They’re already being treated differently and more favorably when they were fast-tracked.

Nothing “lucky break”ish about that.

Oh the whole thing is bs. I haven't followed too closely but reading some about it, its a weird racist political stunt. We are talking about 59 people because the president wanted to give the middle finger to someone-not sure who exactly but this wasn't out of his concern for the plight of white South African citizens.

That being said, you can't fault the people for taking advantage of the situation. They are designated refugees on American soil and should be treated as such. If we stop treating them like human beings and say one group's cause is more worthy than the other, we become no better than the administration.

 

[CowboyJD]

Chairman Green Presses DHS, FBI on Failure to Fully Vet Afghan National Charged with Plotting Election Day Terrorist Attack, & Increased ISIS-Related Threats – Committee on Homeland Security

homeland.house.gov

So you’re aping MAGA talking points.

In fact you quoted MAGA talking points as your supposed “facts”

And shipping them all out based upon the supposed same protocols that missed one is the very definition of guilt by association.

 

[Rob B.]

So you’re aping MAGA talking points.

In fact you quoted MAGA talking points as your supposed “facts”

And shipping them all out based upon the supposed same protocols that missed one is the very definition of guilt by association.

I find it naive of anyone to believe that was just a one time oppsie when thousands of them were allowed a free pass after the withdrawal from Afghanistan. But here we are worried more about 59 refugee farmers from South Africa.

 

[CowboyJD]

Oh the whole thing is bs. I haven't followed too closely but reading some about it, its a weird racist political stunt. We are talking about 59 people because the president wanted to give the middle finger to someone-not sure who exactly but this wasn't out of his concern for the plight of white South African citizens.

That being said, you can't fault the people for taking advantage of the situation. They are designated refugees on American soil and should be treated as such. If we stop treating them like human beings and say one group's cause is more worthy than the other, we become no better than the administration.

I’m not advocating treating them unlawfully or different legally.

I’m also not advocating for telling charitable organizations or churches to take action that they believe would be immoral.

Don’t we all judge one group’s cause more worthy than another every single day or our lives. Don’t we regularly make moral judgments about where our efforts go like the Episcopal Church is doing?

 

[CowboyJD]

I find it naive of anyone to believe that was just a one time oppsie when thousands of them were allowed a free pass after the withdrawal from Afghanistan. But here we are worried more about 59 refugee farmers from South Africa.

False dichotomy and a statement that you wholeheartedly endorse guilt by association.

 

[Rob B.]

False dichotomy and a statement that you wholeheartedly endorse guilt by association.

If Biden let them in....swell.
If Trump let them in...send them back.

Keep going.

 

[mugatu]

Oh the whole thing is bs. I haven't followed too closely but reading some about it, its a weird racist political stunt. We are talking about 59 people because the president wanted to give the middle finger to someone-not sure who exactly but this wasn't out of his concern for the plight of white South African citizens.

That being said, you can't fault the people for taking advantage of the situation. They are designated refugees on American soil and should be treated as such. If we stop treating them like human beings and say one group's cause is more worthy than the other, we become no better than the administration.

Might have some of Elon's influence there too.

 

[cowboyinexile]

I’m not advocating treating them unlawfully or different legally.

I’m also not advocating for telling charitable organizations or churches to take action that they believe would be immoral.

Don’t we all judge one group’s cause more worthy than another every single day or our lives. Don’t we regularly make moral judgments about where our efforts go like the Episcopal Church is doing?

Probably.

And you are right-its a charity and they can choose to promote their activities as they please. No one is forcing them to help (although I'm guessing the administration is looking at ways to "convince" them if that suits their goal).

But I think if you your mission is to help immigrants seeking asylum, you shouldn't judge their worthiness based on your political views.

 

[CowboyJD]

But here we are worried more about 59 refugee farmers from South Africa.

Who’s worried about them?

I see a lot of people saying it’s unfair that they are unjustly being sent to the front of the immigration line without factually showing that they meet refugee criteria. Trump’s “genocide” claims are….like most of what he says…an utter fiction.

 

[CowboyJD]

Probably.

And you are right-its a charity and they can choose to promote their activities as they please. No one is forcing them to help (although I'm guessing the administration is looking at ways to "convince" them if that suits their goal).

But I think if you your mission is to help immigrants seeking asylum, you shouldn't judge their worthiness based on your political views.

I mean fair enough, but I don’t necessarily agree that thinking these folks are immorally jumping the line is necessarily a “political view”. I can see the case for that being a moral stance rather than a political one.

 

[Rob B.]

Who’s worried about them?

I see a lot of people saying it’s unfair that they are unjustly being sent to the front of the immigration line without factually showing that they meet refugee criteria. Trump’s “genocide” claims are….like most of what he says…an utter fiction.

There are literally democrats protesting them.

 

[CowboyJD]

If Biden let them in....swell.
If Trump let them in...send them back.

Keep going.

Nonsense strawman argument that I never made or said in any way shape or form.

Keep going.

I enjoy watching you flail about.

 

[cowboyinexile]

I mean fair enough, but I don’t necessarily agree that thinking these folks are immorally jumping the line is necessarily a “political view”. I can see the case for that being a moral stance rather than a political one.

That's understandable and I didn't think about it that way from the organizations perspective.