Trump 47

View attachment 11250

It's not his fault his actions caused an immediate drop in the markets... obviously it's Biden's fault. This man won't ever take responsibility.

Sad Mood GIF by Travis
 
View attachment 11250

It's not his fault his actions caused an immediate drop in the markets... obviously it's Biden's fault. This man won't ever take responsibility.
Did Trump not hear that Apple is moving production of its phones from China to India, rather than the U. S.? Once again, with tariffs on China so high and manufacturing needing so much stuff from there, why would a manufacturer want to relocate in the U. S. for that reason alone? To attract manufacturing it would be somewhat less irrational for Trump to demand the minimum wage be abolished, though I doubt many people would want to work in a factory for less than $7.25 an hour.

It would be a wiser experiment to see what happens by dropping tariffs to zero, eliminate corporate income tax and make up for lost revenue by raising individual income taxes on the wealthy. Of course, Musk would demand keeping high tariffs on electric cars from China.

Speaking of the wealthy, it's okay for them to buy gold from China. No tariff on that.
 
Last edited:
So the members of Trump's admin can sell the $5 million Gold instant American citizenship card and keep and us the money for themselves!???

Lutnick: "The attention on the Trump gold card -- I mean, it makes me very popular. Last night, I was out for dinner and somebody came up and said, 'Can I buy 10?' And I'm like, that's pretty good, that's $50 million for dinner. So it's paying for my dinner."

 
President Trump to ABC News’ Terry Moran on undocumented migrants and their right to due process: “If people come into our country illegally, there's a different standard.” #Trump100TheInterview
Where was all the outrage when Obama deported illegals with no due process?
 
Where was all the outrage when Obama deported illegals with no due process?
you mean this ??

But starting in 2005, the Department of Homeland Security increased use of a second procedure known as “expedited removal.” This is a formal process and ESTABLISHED LAW PASSED BY CONGRESS in which the deportee never sees a judge, but the removal still goes on his or her permanent record.

  • Passed the House on June 13, 1996 (278–126, Roll call vote 247, via Clerk.House.gov)
  • Passed the Senate on July 18, 1996 (72–27, Roll call vote 200, via Senate.gov, in lieu of S. 1894)
  • Reported by the joint conference committee on September 28, 1996; agreed to by the House on September 28, 1996 (370–37, Roll call vote 455, via Clerk.House.gov) and by the Senate on September 30, 1996 (Agreed voice vote)
  • Signed into law by President Bill Clinton on September 30, 1996



Those “expedited removals,” which were first introduced by the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), can take place only when authorities apprehend an immigrant within 100 miles of the border and within two weeks of entering the country. There’s a reason to restrict the practice in that way: It’s supposed to focus only on people who haven’t yet established roots and family ties within the U.S.
 
you mean this ??

But starting in 2005, the Department of Homeland Security increased use of a second procedure known as “expedited removal.” This is a formal process and ESTABLISHED LAW in which the deportee never sees a judge, but the removal still goes on his or her permanent record.

Those “expedited removals,” which were first introduced by the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), can take place only when authorities apprehend an immigrant within 100 miles of the border and within two weeks of entering the country. There’s a reason to restrict the practice in that way: It’s supposed to focus only on people who haven’t yet established roots and family ties within the U.S.
No, this.

 
so your going to use ACLU LAWSUITS against the Obama Admin saying what they did was outside the scope of the Law and was Wrong and was challenged in court

To Claim that No One Challenged the Obama Admin for using this established Law


Your a special kinda something. You literally gave Examples of Actual Outrage and Lawsuits to claim there was no Outrage. It literally is the ACLU Lawsuits filed over it YOU linked.
 
so your going to use ACLU LAWSUITS against the Obama Admin saying what they did was outside the scope of the Law and was Wrong and was challenged in court

To Claim that No One Challenged the Obama Admin for using this established Law


Your a special kinda something. You literally gave Examples of Actual Outrage and Lawsuits to claim there was no Outrage. It literally is the ACLU Lawsuits filed over it YOU linked.
I'm using it saying he did the exact same thing but you were ok with it then, and even tried to defend it in your previous post. Were you binmanning OP with relentless posts against it then?

Talk about special.
 
I'm using it saying he did the exact same thing but you were ok with it then, and even tried to defend it in your previous post.

Talk about special.
please then ..enlighten me on what Congressionally passed law Trump is following right now which allows him to remove Illegal Aliens without Due Process who have been in the country for longer than 2 weeks OR which were captured more than 100 miles away from the border ?

Hint

That law doesn't exist. The Law has a very specific and defined time frame.
 
please then ..enlighten me on what Congressionally passed law Trump is following right now which allows him to remove Illegal Aliens without Due Process who have been in the country for longer than 2 weeks OR which were captured more than 100 miles away from the border ?

Hint

That law doesn't exist. The Law has a very specific and defined time frame.
So ok when Obama did it, (D)ifferent because it's Trump.
Got it.
 
Back
Top