What time did they have to run primaries for a new candidate? That I think was the biggest driver. If Biden hadn't stayed on until 100 days until election, they could have run votes through the states and picked someone. But all the primaries had been run, how do replace someone AFTER the primaries?
No, but I don't think it will make up over 20million voters from both parties.
I think we saw that you don't do that! Haha.
Meh - kinda surprising for me, but looking back I've been hearing about "TEXAS TURNING PURPLE" for like 15 years now and it's not happening. So more like par for the course.
I don't get why they say it constantly. Also, he still wins without texas.
The first mistake was picking her for VP in the first place. They were stuck with her and if they had run an emergency primary their black base would have completely abandoned them.
Nope.....the charade was exposed at the debate. Biden would have lost as bad or worse. Biden/Harris had a really bad run some of it is on them some of it was being handed a nation dealing with a pandemic. Harris can't/didn't separate herself from Biden. They would have been better picking almost anyone. There are 28 Dem governors.....almost all of them would have won. They could have grabbed a dozen people from the senate and won. The hitched their wagon to one of the only people that wouldn't have won last night. I agree they couldn't hold a primary but they chose really really poorly.
Makes sense, thanks.
I think that is how much they have counted???
Naw, I'm going let you hold on to your deeply held conspiracy theories of 20 million manufactured votes in the last election. I'm just going to roll my eyes at you.
You absolutely were insinuating cheating...that or trolling.
here's a quick/condensed response: abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights, affordable care act, planned Parenthood, his overall misogyny, I could go on and explain each topic, but get the feeling that you are not really concerned or give two cents about my concerns...
