I see zero difference in MAGA and somebody who "holds their nose" while voting from trump. End result is the same.
Yep. We've got plenty of history to draw from. This amount of hate and dehumanizing of others does not lead to good places.I see zero difference in MAGA and somebody who "holds their nose" while voting from trump. End result is the same.
For what it is worth the IMF announced this week the "fake" US economy was the best in the world again and had retaken the lead from ChinaThe US economy is fake now !!???
Trump bizarrely claims that the record-breaking economy isn't actually happening.
"Our economy is not, this is just, it's like a fake economy."
American Bridge 21st Century (@american_bridge) on Threads
Trump’s economic plan is to provoke and create unnecessary tension with our trade partners – all while issuing massive tariffs that will costs families up to $3,900. These are economy wrecking ideas.www.threads.net
Yet you won't take a stand against it because of the letter in front of the other candidates name.
I see zero difference in MAGA and somebody who "holds their nose" while voting from trump. End result is the same.
Questions the Christian Faith of anyone who does NOT vote for him......at what point can any of you biblically justify a Man making this claim
You're Christian Faith is NOT determined in your relationship to or admiration OF or POLITICAL VOTE to ANY MAN.... PERIOD. This is against the word of God .that somehow your relationship with Jesus Christ is determined in your support or lack of support for a mere mortal man..
Trump gets asked about his own faith and can’t stop himself from attacking his political opponents, telling lies about Kamala Harris, and questioning the religious faith of anyone who doesn’t vote for him.
American Bridge 21st Century (@american_bridge) on Threads
Trump gets asked about his own faith and can’t stop himself from attacking his political opponents, telling lies about Kamala Harris, and questioning the religious faith of anyone who doesn’t vote for him.www.threads.net
I have principles and values and the only thing I care about right now is waking up next Wednesday morning knowing that I haven’t compromised them or given them away.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So, is there even an option outside of Trump or Harris outside of a write in?
So, is there even an option outside of Trump or Harris outside of a write in?
Just a reminder, this guy has a cabinet position waiting for him if Trump wins
In a non-battleground state, I endorse the idea of voting third party to keep future 3rd party candidates on the ballot in future elections. I've done so in Oklahoma for numerous years because electoral college votes are going to the Republican candidate as a foregone conclusion. I have the luxury of not thinking about "damage mitigation" with my vote for President and keeping third candidates having ballot access gives my vote more value to me than voting the lesser of two evils in a state where the Presidential election is a foregone conclusion.
This is how I look at it also.In a non-battleground state, I endorse the idea of voting third party to keep future 3rd party candidates on the ballot in future elections. I've done so in Oklahoma for numerous years because electoral college votes are going to the Republican candidate as a foregone conclusion. I have the luxury of not thinking about "damage mitigation" with my vote for President and keeping third candidates having ballot access gives my vote more value to me than voting the lesser of two evils in a state where the Presidential election is a foregone conclusion.
In a battleground state, a protest vote for a third party candidate based upon a false equivalency between Trump and Harris is a vote for Trump. It's that simple to me. Sorry that voters in battleground states don't have the same luxury as me to not think about damage mitigation with their vote, but it's an aspect of our flawed electoral system.
By saying this, I'm not telling anyone how to vote. If you feel okay with voting for a third party in a battleground state because you just can't vote for Trump, that's all good with me. I'm just pointing out the realities of what that vote really is and does.
Also I agree the electoral system is not the most ideal anymore. What are ways to change it without going to the opposite side of rural votes having less weight. This is of course forgetting about having to get 2/3rds of the states to agree to change it.In a non-battleground state, I endorse the idea of voting third party to keep future 3rd party candidates on the ballot in future elections. I've done so in Oklahoma for numerous years because electoral college votes are going to the Republican candidate as a foregone conclusion. I have the luxury of not thinking about "damage mitigation" with my vote for President and keeping third candidates having ballot access gives my vote more value to me than voting the lesser of two evils in a state where the Presidential election is a foregone conclusion.
In a battleground state, a protest vote for a third party candidate based upon a false equivalency between Trump and Harris is a vote for Trump. It's that simple to me. Sorry that voters in battleground states don't have the same luxury as me to not think about damage mitigation with their vote, but it's an aspect of our flawed electoral system.
By saying this, I'm not telling anyone how to vote. If you feel okay with voting for a third party in a battleground state because you just can't vote for Trump, that's all good with me. I'm just pointing out the realities of what that vote really is and does.