US continues to go backward...

not sure we should be throwing around the term racist...let's stick with bigot...
To which whit asked "who"
whoever's shoe it fits...
To which I answered truthfully and correctly, because it was you and the gaping V who threw the terms around. This fact is undeniable
your conscience spoke up and claimed the shoe...congrats...
Then your unconscience replied with this.
You're just too much.
 
Relevancy is subjective. Is it a requirement in this conversation?

I'm curious to know if there were other journalists there reporting. That's all the relevancy I feel that you need, if you care to answer an incredibly simple question.
I did answer your incredibly irrelevant and simple minded question.

How about your explain why you think it matters whether or not there were other journalists there?
 
Do you happen to have names so I can read/watch their take on it?
 
You edited it and you know it.

Due to your timely and informative edit, I no longer find this reply boringZZZZ. It's now marked as informative.

Thank you for answering.
You are welcome.

Now how about answering my question of why you think it matters whether there were other journalists there.

Since “relevancy is subjective” as you say, I’m interested in why you felt it was relevant or if you were just asking a random question that didn’t matter.
 
You are welcome.

Now how about answering my question of why you think it matters whether there were other journalists there.

Since “relevancy is subjective” as you say, I’m interested in why you felt it was relevant or if you were just asking a random question that didn’t matter.

Please admit you edited in an answer while I was responding or after I responded and I will provide you an answer as to why I asked if Lemon was the only journalist at the church.
 
Not before editing an answer in, you didn't. You edited it and you know it.
Editing a post (after it’s been responded to) calling out someone else for editing a post after it has been responded to is either genius in it’s intended irony or incredibly hypocritical.

Either way….kudos.
 
Editing a post (after it’s been responded to) calling out someone else for editing a post after it has been responded to is either genius in it’s intended irony or incredibly hypocritical.

Either way….kudos.

Just playing your game. Only real difference is my edit keeps my point the same. Your edit makes me look like an asshole that didn't read your whole post when you know that isn't case.
 
So they protested that church because the Pastor is a desk employee for ICE. I did not know that.
I'm not sure that doesn't make it worse but I guess since it was HIS place of worship they screamed at then they were targeting him and only him?

Why not protest legally in the street outside the church?
Is that not enough for the media to cover anymore?
 
Please admit you edited in an answer while I was responding or after I responded and I will provide you an answer as to why I asked if Lemon was the only journalist at the church.
I never claimed I didn’t.

Clearly, I did.

And you just did it too.

The question I asked you to answer wasn’t why you asked if he was the only journalist at the church.

The question I asked is why you think it matters.
 
Anywho... Since you've admitted your ill timed edit, begrudgingly as it was, I still owe you an answer, @CowboyJD...

I was curious to know if Lemon was the only journalist there because it would've been a helluva scoop that only one big name journalist scored. That would've been interesting to me.
 
So they protested that church because the Pastor is a desk employee for ICE. I did not know that.
I'm not sure that doesn't make it worse but I guess since it was HIS place of worship they screamed at then they were targeting him and only him?

Why not protest legally in the street outside the church?
Is that not enough for the media to cover anymore?
A question was asked.

I answered that question.

You asked for identities of those other journalists.

I provided one.

At no point have I supported or endorsed the protests in the church themselves. Not am I in any position to speak for why the protestors did or didn’t do something different.
 
what term was I throwing around? bigot? (once) racist? (wrong guy)...who hurt you?
You're still trying to deflect your own dipshittery and it's hilarious.

You were asked who was throwing the terms racist and/or bigot. I answered him. You started on about conscience and shoes.
You may require medication.
 
Back
Top