He was there as a journalist.
Were their other journalists?
He was there as a journalist.
whoever's shoe it fits...
How is that at all relevant?Were their other journalists?
To which whit asked "who"not sure we should be throwing around the term racist...let's stick with bigot...
To which I answered truthfully and correctly, because it was you and the gaping V who threw the terms around. This fact is undeniablewhoever's shoe it fits...
Then your unconscience replied with this.your conscience spoke up and claimed the shoe...congrats...
How is that at all relevant?
Do you happen to have names so I can read/watch their take on it?How is that at all relevant?
But, yes there were other journalists.
I did answer your incredibly irrelevant and simple minded question.Relevancy is subjective. Is it a requirement in this conversation?
I'm curious to know if there were other journalists there reporting. That's all the relevancy I feel that you need, if you care to answer an incredibly simple question.
How is that at all relevant?
But, yes there were other journalists.
I did answer your incredibly irrelevant and simple minded question.
How about your explain why you think it matters whether or not there were other journalists there?
Do you happen to have names so I can read/watch their take on it?
You edited it and you know it.
You are welcome.Due to your timely and informative edit, I no longer find this reply boringZZZZ. It's now marked as informative.
Thank you for answering.
You are welcome.
Now how about answering my question of why you think it matters whether there were other journalists there.
Since “relevancy is subjective” as you say, I’m interested in why you felt it was relevant or if you were just asking a random question that didn’t matter.
what term was I throwing around? bigot? (once) racist? (wrong guy)...who hurt you?To which I answered truthfully and correctly, because it was you and the gaping V who threw the terms around. This fact is undeniable
Editing a post (after it’s been responded to) calling out someone else for editing a post after it has been responded to is either genius in it’s intended irony or incredibly hypocritical.Not before editing an answer in, you didn't. You edited it and you know it.
Editing a post (after it’s been responded to) calling out someone else for editing a post after it has been responded to is either genius in it’s intended irony or incredibly hypocritical.
Either way….kudos.
So they protested that church because the Pastor is a desk employee for ICE. I did not know that.![]()
157K views · 3.1K reactions | Excellent reporting by @bygeorgiafort who along with journalists like @donlemonofficial went to #occupiedminnesota to cover this and other protests. This is vital work for the #1stamendment and should not be attacked by
Excellent reporting by @bygeorgiafort who along with journalists like @donlemonofficial went to #occupiedminnesota to cover this and other protests. This is vital work for the #1stamendment and...www.facebook.com
I never claimed I didn’t.Please admit you edited in an answer while I was responding or after I responded and I will provide you an answer as to why I asked if Lemon was the only journalist at the church.
A question was asked.So they protested that church because the Pastor is a desk employee for ICE. I did not know that.
I'm not sure that doesn't make it worse but I guess since it was HIS place of worship they screamed at then they were targeting him and only him?
Why not protest legally in the street outside the church?
Is that not enough for the media to cover anymore?
You're still trying to deflect your own dipshittery and it's hilarious.what term was I throwing around? bigot? (once) racist? (wrong guy)...who hurt you?