Damn, good vets ARE really hard to find.BTW, that's my vet. Weird coincidence, right?
He's a really good vet and he's going to stay my vet even though I disagree with those posts.
Damn, good vets ARE really hard to find.BTW, that's my vet. Weird coincidence, right?
He's a really good vet and he's going to stay my vet even though I disagree with those posts.
What if he did kill Kirk for Israel? It won't change anything. Americans will continue voting for incumbents in Congress who take money from pro-Israel war interests.
BTW, that's my vet. Weird coincidence, right?
He's a really good vet and he's going to stay my vet even though I disagree with those posts.
This is literally the most intelligent thing I've seen you post today.This is literally like arguing with my 7yo about anything
Are you implying he's not a good vet and killed them or something?Was my sister's vet as well. He dogs are dead.
Are you implying he's not a good vet and killed them or something?
Explicit claims of causation rather than vague claims of correlation would be helpful. Say what you mean and mean what you say. I would want to assume anything one way or the other.
My personal experience with him is that he and his staff and other vets are skillful, caring, and professional in their dealings with me and mine.
Sorry to hear about your sister's dogs.
Fair enough.No. Her dogs died of things out of the vet's control. I just didn't want to leave anything open to why he "was" her vet after yesterday.
Fair enough.
I was horrified when I first read it, thinking she killed her dogs after reading the post by the vet.Fair enough.
Hey look, the crazy vet has brought us all together!Sorry. Was a little to ocam's razor-yish on the original reply.
Hey look, the crazy vet has brought us all together!
My whole point is that you're calling for it to stop now, because you obviously identified with the person killed. When it was Whitmer, Pelosi, etc. effing etc. it was "meh".
This has been coming for a long time, and whether you like it or not it's spurned on by the president of this stupid country. Look at his comments yesterday about the radical left.
I actually agree with you, and have been saying it for years. As have most "leftists". So spare me the righteous indignation.
Shit's going to get worse and worse. I suppose we should all buckle up and hope we have the leadership in place to get us through it.
I am not following the bolded part. Christians did virtually all of the lynchings around that time, right? Especially against black people. The KKK was an explicitly Christian organization.If you took a time machine to the 50s and 60s and took a poll on what Trans People were, you'd have a poll that indicated not many people knew what a trans person was. Lets take a look at alleged lynching statistics. If lynching was the way we dealt with weirdos, we didn't encounter many or maybe folks in the 50s and 60s are not as violent as the words you've put in Charlie's mouth.
Whites Blacks Total
View attachment 14057
Source: https://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/lynchingyear.html
Beatings? Probably some. LGTBQ are still beaten some in today's society.
Charlie didn't say that trans people should be harmed. Dealt with can mean a lot of different things. He could've meant beaten. He could've meant ignored. I'm confident he didn't mean lynched. As devote of a Chrisitan as he was, I seriously doubt he meant lynched.
Your take on Charlie quote is the second quote I've seen taken way out of context to fit a gross narrative.
@osuwhit This would be a huge escalation of mossad's activities and would indicate they are aware of american public opinion turning against them. I will need to see hard evidence before I link it.Only one conspiracy out there deals with an actual motive that is plausible
1. Kirk ...as Pointed out earlier ...is an influencer for millions of young Republican voters
2. He used his platform over the last 3 weeks to push for a release of the Epstein files
3. He made bold claims if he got them he would release them 100% unredacted and name everyone
4. He harped on it so much that LAST WEEK MAGA became split over it and Laura Loomer said he had betrayed MAGA and stabbed Trump in the back
This has all been widely reported as it unfolded
Now the conspiracy is that someone who is VERY Power, VERY well connected and of VERY wealthy means took advantage of the Utah FBI Field office firings and leadership changes in the last few weeks as an opportunity to ensure Charlie stopped pushing his millions and of young voters toward seeking the truth on the Epstein files
And Lord knows that book is FULL of people on a Global level that could have taken advantage of that opportunity... including Govt level contacts across the US , Israel, UK and more we don't know of
I am not following the bolded part. Christians did virtually all of the lynchings around that time, right? Especially against black people. The KKK was an explicitly Christian organization.
You are correct that there was not really a cultural consciousness of trans people then as we have now. They were considered sexual deviants or mentally ill. The details on crime against them prior to Stonewall was difficult. This is a book about the violence folks in that community faced prior to Stonewall, when it became even the mildest aspect of culturally acceptable to come out in any way: https://www.counterpointpress.com/dd-product/indecent-advances/
He routinely called them abominations. The narrative fits with his own words that he constantly said.
@osuwhit This would be a huge escalation of mossad's activities and would indicate they are aware of american public opinion turning against them. I will need to see hard evidence before I link it.
For example, I think they were likely involved with epstein, but that is because there is no way that operation existed without one and likely multiple intelligence services being involved. Plus, Ghislane Maxwell's father is a known Mossad collaborator.