US continues to go backward...

GOGETUMPOKE said:
reason.com

This scientist used to spread climate change alarmism. Now she's trying to debunk it.

We are told climate change is a crisis, and that there is an "overwhelming scientific consensus." "It's a manufactured consensus," says climate scientist
reason.com reason.com
Click to expand...

I’m totally with you on climate change alarmism, but I’m not sure I’d call this an unbiased news source worth planting my flag on. And what happened to John Stossel’s career that he’s providing content to a small fringe Libertarian organization?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
gopokes83 said:
I’m totally with you on climate change alarmism, but I’m not sure I’d call this an unbiased news source worth planting my flag on. And what happened to John Stossel’s career that he’s providing content to a small fringe Libertarian organization?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Just one of thousands of opposing views on climate change. FWIW Strossel has always been pretty reliable in my opinion.
 
GOGETUMPOKE said:
Who decided that opposing views on climate science aren’t credible? There are about a million views in between Greta and AOC and outright deniers. The truth, as usual, is probably somewhere in the middle. Your side is currently in the process of insisting that men can have periods and give birth.
Click to expand...
First I’ve heard of it. But sounds like a topic that involves more medicine than I can speak on credibly.
 
GOGETUMPOKE said:
Just one of thousands of opposing views on climate change. FWIW Strossel has always been pretty reliable in my opinion.
Click to expand...

Well as we know in science, it's the amount of opposing views that determines whether a theory has merit and not the actual data. /s

As Einstein said when a book called "100 Authors Against Einstein" that opposed his theory of relativity: "Why 100? If I were wrong, one would be enough". Same thing here, a lot of objections but no actual data that contradicts the scientific consensus.
 
Did you guys not read the post ;!???
I have no issue with schools showing opposing science for climate change
However, Florida only approved ONE SOURCE of climate denier information to be used in schools and it happens to be a VERY controversial and very extremist source


If you want to show opposing views in science in school...go nuts ... But restricting that view to one extremist source as the opposition is exactly the type of behavior you guys are arguing AGAINST


You can't Cherry pick the data and that's exactly what Florida is doing here...cherry picking the opposition data

Wake up folks
 
Polds4OSU said:
Did you guys not read the post ;!???
I have no issue with schools showing opposing science for climate change
However, Florida only approved ONE SOURCE of climate denier information to be used in schools and it happens to be a VERY controversial and very extremist source


If you want to show opposing views in science in school...go nuts ... But restricting that view to one extremist source as the opposition is exactly the type of behavior you guys are arguing AGAINST


You can't Cherry pick the data and that's exactly what Florida is doing here...cherry picking the opposition data

Wake up folks
Click to expand...
Are you referring to the Politico news story that you posted?
If so, how are you determining they only approved ONE SOURCE? Where in the article does it list that Florida is "restricting that view to one extremist source"? I think you may have jumped to a conclusion that is not in the article.

Also, your news article specifically states it is not mandatory to show the videos, but just provides the resource for government and civics class teachers to utilize at their option.
 
JTOSU said:
Are you referring to the Politico news story that you posted?
If so, how are you determining they only approved ONE SOURCE? Where in the article does it list that Florida is "restricting that view to one extremist source"? I think you may have jumped to a conclusion that is not in the article.

Also, your news article specifically states it is not mandatory to show the videos, but just provides the resource for government and civics class teachers to utilize at their option.
Click to expand...
It clearly states that videos of opposing views from PragerU are the only opposition videos approved to be shown
 
Polds4OSU said:
It clearly states that videos of opposing views from PragerU are the only opposition videos approved to be shown
Click to expand...
No it does not. I think you need to re-read your article.

My assumption is your confusion is with this sentence in the Politico article: "For now, PragerU videos have only been approved for use in the state's civic and government classes for younger children."

The word "only" means only for use in those classes ---- not that PragerU are the only videos approved.
 
Last edited:
Pokey said:
First I’ve heard of it. But sounds like a topic that involves more medicine than I can speak on credibly.
Click to expand...
It simply refers to women who have transitioned to IDing as male. So, they look just like men everywhere except between the legs. Therefore, they can still have babies and have periods. That is where the notion comes from that men can have babies. Conservatives don't look at it that way. They are only willing to count what is going on between the legs.
 
Stillwater Townie said:
It simply refers to women who have transitioned to IDing as male. So, they look just like men everywhere except between the legs. Therefore, they can still have babies and have periods. That is where the notion comes from that men can have babies. Conservatives don't look at it that way. They are only willing to count what is going on between the legs.
Click to expand...
Typical Republican response, making mountains out of mole hills and mandating their way or the highway. Amazing to me that some people believe they’re so perfect that it’s their right to tell others how to live and what they can do with their own bodies.
 
GOGETUMPOKE said:
Just one of thousands of opposing views on climate change. FWIW Strossel has always been pretty reliable in my opinion.
Click to expand...

I just said I’m with you on climate change. And the fact that Stossel has been so solid is what makes me wonder why he’s working at this small time job.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Pastor alarmed after Trump-loving congregants deride Jesus' teachings as 'weak'

www.rawstory.com

Pastor alarmed after Trump-loving congregants deride Jesus' teachings as 'weak'

Evangelical Christian leader Russell Moore revealed this week that many evangelical pastors have become alarmed that their Trump-loving congregants have become so militant that they are even rejecting the teachings of Jesus Christ.In an interview with NPR, Moore said that multiple pastors had...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

steross
Republican Attorneys General to Court: We Demand More Pregnant Teens
Replies
3
Views
132
mugatu
mugatu
steross
American Healthcare continues to go backward
6 7 8
Replies
149
Views
5K
RxCowboy
RxCowboy
P
GOP congressman Chip Roy says US isn’t worth defending anymore with Military
Replies
4
Views
117
Heart Smiles
H
P
Oklahoma Supreme Court rules publicly funded religious charter school is unconstitutional
Replies
2
Views
144
Stillwater Townie
S
P
Matt Gaetz tied to teen party, lashes out at House Ethics Committee over expected report , will not willingly cooperate with House investigation
Replies
6
Views
164
Polds4OSU
P
Back
Top