US continues to go backward...
- Thread starter PF5
- Start date
Moar gub’mint!Kansas State Rep. Brian Bergkamp (R-Wichita), author of a bill to prohibit using SNAP funds to purchase soda or candy, admits to Rep. Brooklynne Mosley (D-Lawrence) that he's okay with banning snacks for veterans on SNAP.
Heartland Signal (@heartlandsignal) auf Threads)
Kansas State Rep. Brian Bergkamp (R-Wichita), author of a bill to prohibit using SNAP funds to purchase soda or candy, admits to Rep. Brooklynne Mosley (D-Lawrence) that he's okay with banning snacks for veterans on SNAP. Follow @Heartlandsignal for more.www.threads.net
Stillwater Townie
Ranger
What about the PPP money that Sen. Mullin supposedly used to buy a mansion in Florida? Since he presents himself to the media wearing a cowboy hat, one might think if he was a real one he would have instead bought a big ranch in Oklahoma.
Everyone who took stoke using these programs suck, regardless of the letter next to their name.
Stillwater Townie
Ranger
Most Republicans in Oklahoma don't consider it a big issue to fret over as to what Mullin did with his PPP money.
What's a gender non-conforming haircut?
Are we gonna start measuring kids hair length?
mugatu
Ranger
Is the North Korea haircut list next?
These Are North Korea’s 28 State-Approved Hairstyles | TIME.com
It looks a lot of this year's male Oscar winners wouldn't survive the Communist state of North Korea without a haircut.
newsfeed.time.com
There’s absolutely nothing conservative about this. “Moar gub’mint!”
mugatu
Ranger
So lookimg for a sanity check on his reasoning here.
Schumer claims that the reason he voted for the CR was to prevent a government shutdown, obviously. I saw something today where he was saying that it was not because of the shutdown specifically but because while shutdown was in place, Executive Branch gets to dictate everything that's still open. His examples were cuts to funding Social Security or medicare or whatever other programs.
My question. Would that have given Trump essentially no check during the shutdown? Could he have left courts closed indefinitely while it was ongoing?
Schumer claims that the reason he voted for the CR was to prevent a government shutdown, obviously. I saw something today where he was saying that it was not because of the shutdown specifically but because while shutdown was in place, Executive Branch gets to dictate everything that's still open. His examples were cuts to funding Social Security or medicare or whatever other programs.
My question. Would that have given Trump essentially no check during the shutdown? Could he have left courts closed indefinitely while it was ongoing?
How would it be different than the government shutdown the first time Trump was in office?
I'm not buying that. I think government shutdowns are nothing more than political theater that do more harm than good (especially to government employees) and the world hasn't ended yet because of one. For whatever reason he caved and this is him tyring to save face.
mugatu
Ranger
That was my original thought. It's all theater and Schumer being too much chicken sh!t to push back. But if the courts could in fact be closed during a shutdown, then I could kinda see it.
There wasn't as much judicial work going on to stop/slow his actions back then - less obviously illegal crap going on while having to rely on judges to stop it.
That could be. 8 years ago there were enough adults in the room to tell him what he's proposing is illegal and they can't do it. Right now it looks like the closest thing we have to that is Rubio and he's been pretty useless so far.
The "just let it happen and complain about it" strategy for the dems seems pretty ineffective so far though.
90.398 Aufrufe · 2.437 Reaktionen | You have NEVER seen anything like this!!!! | Chad Prather
You have NEVER seen anything like this!!!!.
www.facebook.com
Similar threads
