Trump will not be able to fire Noem, Bondi, or Lutnick over incompetence or scandals (I suppose if bulletproof evidence could be found but that almost does not exist in the misinformation age). He chose them for loyalty not competence. If they remain loyal, he won't get rid of them. If he does, he has nothing left. He taught competent people (John Kelly, Mattis, Tillerson etc) to avoid him like the plague. All he has left are the loyalists.
I’m worried about Homan. He’s been acting like something of an adult in Minnesota. He doesn’t have much time left.Trump will not be able to fire Noem, Bondi, or Lutnick over incompetence or scandals (I suppose if bulletproof evidence could be found but that almost does not exist in the misinformation age). He chose them for loyalty not competence. If they remain loyal, he won't get rid of them. If he does, he has nothing left. He taught competent people (John Kelly, Mattis, Tillerson etc) to avoid him like the plague. All he has left are the loyalists.
Ehh, he has still been doing the same heinous sh!t bovino was doing. He just hasnt been as inflamatory in press conferences and despite ICE and CBP pulling guns on observers multiple times, no one has been shot on his watch, yet.I’m worried about Homan. He’s been acting like something of an adult in Minnesota. He doesn’t have much time left.
Well, there’s that…Ehh, he has still been doing the same heinous sh!t bovino was doing. He just hasnt been as inflamatory in press conferences and despite ICE and CBP pulling guns on observers, no one has been shot on his watch, yet.
I think he is saying this for one of two reasons:Trump can say what he wants I guess. Now let's see him try and enforce it.
![]()
Samsung News
Trump says he will require voter ID for midterms regardless of Congresswww.samsung-news.com
He is going to have to be dragged out of the white house (if he doesnt pass away first).I think he is saying this for one of two reasons:
1. He is getting us ready for the dictatorship he think he will have.
3. He is clueless and thinks he is a dictator.
I think he is saying this for one of two reasons:
1. He is getting us ready for the dictatorship he think he will have.
3. He is clueless and thinks he is a dictator.
That may be true.He lacks a fundamental understanding of how government works. I don't think he knows he can't just anti veto something if congress doesn't approve of it. And besides if he finds the votes in congress he probably doesn't realize that then it's lawsuit city and his lawyers aren't good enough to convince the court system that the government isn't really trying to require a federal poll tax.
That may be true.
It wasn't true 10 years ago.
My brother said it the other night, doesn't it feel like his second term has lasted twelve years already?I think he is saying this for one of two reasons:
1. He is getting us ready for the dictatorship he think he will have.
3. He is clueless and thinks he is a dictator.
4. He just says s*it.I think he is saying this for one of two reasons:
1. He is getting us ready for the dictatorship he think he will have.
3. He is clueless and thinks he is a dictator.
That just isn't true at all. He worked the primaries like a boss. Trump won the open primaries where anyone could vote. He avoided the caucus states where Republicans only could vote. He also lost the closed primaries. Cruz won the caucuses and closed primaries. If not for the open primaries Cruz would have been the Republican candidate and likely would have lost to Clinton. Trump was the only Republican candidate that could have beaten her. I used to think that maybe it was Democrats voting in the open primaries for Trump trying to get the candidate that they wanted to run against and it backfired on them. But I don't think that anymore. 2024 is the evidence that wasn't the truth.I don't know. He didn't understand how primaries worked in 2016.
That just isn't true at all. He worked the primaries like a boss. Trump won the open primaries where anyone could vote. He avoided the caucus states where Republicans only could vote. He also lost the closed primaries. Cruz won the caucuses and closed primaries. If not for the open primaries Cruz would have been the Republican candidate and likely would have lost to Clinton. Trump was the only Republican candidate that could have beaten her. I used to think that maybe it was Democrats voting in the open primaries for Trump trying to get the candidate that they wanted to run against and it backfired on them. But I don't think that anymore. 2024 is the evidence that wasn't the truth.

"Whether approved by Congress or not" is certainly not "what our Founders desired."
Nor was a king disguised as a rambling fool
View attachment 18656
![]()
Senator Adam Schiff (@senadamschiff) on Threads
"Whether approved by Congress or not" is certainly not "what our Founders desired." Nor was a king disguised as a rambling fool.www.threads.com
