Trump 47
- Thread starter PF5
- Start date
Polds4OSU
Marshall
5an
Lindsay Halligan, the newly-installed US Attorney prosecuting James Comey at President Trump's direction, is an insurance attorney and a Miss Colorado finalist. She has never prosecuted a case. https://fortune.com/2025/09/25/lind...colorado-usa-florida-insurance-lawyer-career/
Lindsay Halligan, the newly-installed US Attorney prosecuting James Comey at President Trump's direction, is an insurance attorney and a Miss Colorado finalist. She has never prosecuted a case. https://fortune.com/2025/09/25/lind...colorado-usa-florida-insurance-lawyer-career/
It seems worse this time. I mean he would say some sinister stuff 8 years ago but the more his mind goes it seems like the worse it gets.
Polds4OSU
Marshall
NEW: President Trump signs a presidential memorandum directing the enforcement of death penalty laws in Washington, D.C.
Fox News (@foxnews) on Threads
NEW: President Trump signs a presidential memorandum directing the enforcement of death penalty laws in Washington, D.C.
www.threads.com
Polds4OSU
Marshall
Reporter: There was a little awkwardness in the courtroom because two different versions of the Comey indictment were presented, and Halligan had signed both of them. That just underscored just how new she is at this. It's raising questions on who is going to prosecute this case. Is it going to be Lindsey Halligan, who has no prosecutorial experience? It appears no one in that office is prepared to do it
www.threads.com
FactPost (@factpostnews) on Threads
Reporter: There was a little awkwardness in the courtroom because two different versions of the Comey indictment were presented, and Halligan had signed both of them. That just underscored just how new she is at this. It's raising questions on who is going to prosecute this case. Is it going to...
www.threads.com
Reporter: There was a little awkwardness in the courtroom because two different versions of the Comey indictment were presented, and Halligan had signed both of them. That just underscored just how new she is at this. It's raising questions on who is going to prosecute this case. Is it going to be Lindsey Halligan, who has no prosecutorial experience? It appears no one in that office is prepared to do it
FactPost (@factpostnews) on Threads
Reporter: There was a little awkwardness in the courtroom because two different versions of the Comey indictment were presented, and Halligan had signed both of them. That just underscored just how new she is at this. It's raising questions on who is going to prosecute this case. Is it going to...
And this is why the administration is a clown show.
Another incompetent or at the very least grossly under qualified person working for a manchild who doesn't understand the meaning of the word no.
PF5
Sheriff
damn DEI hires...Reporter: There was a little awkwardness in the courtroom because two different versions of the Comey indictment were presented, and Halligan had signed both of them. That just underscored just how new she is at this. It's raising questions on who is going to prosecute this case. Is it going to be Lindsey Halligan, who has no prosecutorial experience? It appears no one in that office is prepared to do it
FactPost (@factpostnews) on Threads
Reporter: There was a little awkwardness in the courtroom because two different versions of the Comey indictment were presented, and Halligan had signed both of them. That just underscored just how new she is at this. It's raising questions on who is going to prosecute this case. Is it going to...
No one seems to mind trumps DEI hires when the only qualification is being "attractive" (in his eyes).
Polds4OSU
Marshall
New load of documents from the Epstein estate has been turned over to the House Oversight Committee
Oversight Democrats just released new documents revealing that Steve Bannon, Peter Thiel, and Elon Musk are in the Epstein files.
Looks like Musk visited the island
www.threads.com
NEW DOCUMENTS FROM EPSTEIN'S ESTATE DETAILING HIS DAILY SCHEDULE:
They show meetings with Steve Bannon, Peter Thiel, and a potential visit to Epstein’s Island for Elon Musk. Prince Andrew is listed as a passenger on Epstein’s jet.
DOJ must release the Epstein files NOW.
www.threads.com
Oversight Democrats just released new documents revealing that Steve Bannon, Peter Thiel, and Elon Musk are in the Epstein files.
Looks like Musk visited the island
Mike Nellis (@mike_nellis) on Threads
Oversight Democrats just released new documents revealing that Steve Bannon, Peter Thiel, and Elon Musk are in the Epstein files. Looks like Musk visited the island 👀
www.threads.com
NEW DOCUMENTS FROM EPSTEIN'S ESTATE DETAILING HIS DAILY SCHEDULE:They show meetings with Steve Bannon, Peter Thiel, and a potential visit to Epstein’s Island for Elon Musk. Prince Andrew is listed as a passenger on Epstein’s jet.
DOJ must release the Epstein files NOW.
Oversight Committee Democrats (@oversightdems) on Threads
🚨🚨 NEW DOCUMENTS FROM EPSTEIN'S ESTATE DETAILING HIS DAILY SCHEDULE: They show meetings with Steve Bannon, Peter Thiel, and a potential visit to Epstein’s Island for Elon Musk. Prince Andrew is listed as a passenger on Epstein’s jet. DOJ must release the Epstein files NOW.
www.threads.com
I really thought after ridiculing me for requesting that example of exactly the same thing implying that it would be so easy to get I thought you might shove multiple examples in my face.
I guess I overestimated.
And, your last line is a lie or yet another inability to comprehend. The fact that you can't acknowledge that no democratic president, or even a spokesman, has ever done even close to "exactly" the same shows your MAGA roots. Why do you show up to defend them all the time and then claim you aren't them? Look at the words Trump said that you are siding with.
It is ironic. He rails on DEI but if you are an attractive woman under the age of 40 who can stomach him, its a layup hire.
JTOSU
Ranger
My first thought was ...wow, very bold with "inability to comprehend". But sadly, I think that you don't. I think you are being honest and truly think only Republicans demonize Democrats.
1) @Stargazer accurately and simply stated that both Republicans AND Democrats demonize the opposition in outrageous and disingenuous ways. I agree because I understand the obvious. For you to somehow weirdly construe a statement acknowledging both do this as a defense of one says more about you.
2) Trouble with understanding difference between both do this and one does it more than the other: You appear very concerned to conflate the simple acknowledgement that both parties do this to attempt to a mythical statement about equivalence. Unless Stargazer edited his comments, there is nowhere that he implied or made any reference to being equal. He says they both do it and have for some time (this is only a controversial statement for those blindly partisan).
3) As for examples, no one should have to remind people. If you are on a Political Board and you don't know that both sides demonize each other....time to step back and jump outside your echo chamber. MAGA is bad. You are simply AGAM -- just the opposite side of the extreme coin.
Biden "Republicans, they're a threat to our very democracy. They refuse to accept the will of the people. They embrace political violence. They don't believe in democracy"
Hakeem Jeffries "Republicans are literally snatching food from the mouths of children"
To be fair, Trump's first term ended with Jan 6th which covers what Biden said and considering the cuts to SNAP Jeffries isn't wrong either.
Its hard to claim something is inflammatory when there is truth to it.
On the other end, you have stuff like "They're eating cats and dogs" and "They want to make everyone Transgender." I think we can agree that neither of those statements are factually based on the people they were targeting.
Polds4OSU
Marshall
After all that and you're going to misquote Biden
My first thought was ...wow, very bold with "inability to comprehend". But sadly, I think that you don't. I think you are being honest and truly think only Republicans demonize Democrats.
1) @Stargazer accurately and simply stated that both Republicans AND Democrats demonize the opposition in outrageous and disingenuous ways. I agree because I understand the obvious. For you to somehow weirdly construe a statement acknowledging both do this as a defense of one says more about you.
2) Trouble with understanding difference between both do this and one does it more than the other: You appear very concerned to conflate the simple acknowledgement that both parties do this to attempt to a mythical statement about equivalence. Unless Stargazer edited his comments, there is nowhere that he implied or made any reference to being equal. He says they both do it and have for some time (this is only a controversial statement for those blindly partisan).
3) As for examples, no one should have to remind people. If you are on a Political Board and you don't know that both sides demonize each other....time to step back and jump outside your echo chamber. MAGA is bad. You are simply AGAM -- just the opposite side of the extreme coin.
Biden "Republicans, they're a threat to our very democracy. They refuse to accept the will of the people. They embrace political violence. They don't believe in democracy"
Hakeem Jeffries "Republicans are literally snatching food from the mouths of children"
False equivalency rocks!
JTOSU
Ranger
What truth is there in what Biden and Jeffries said? All you are doing is accepting and excusing disingenuous statements because that is your “side”.
The statement that Trump made that Polds quoted is absolutely wrong to do IMO, its inflammatory, and certainly demonizes Democrats.
But his statements that Democrats are wanting men to play in women’s sports, have pushed for illegal immigrants to receive free healthcare, and the last administration was about more open borders. So because there is “truth to it” from Trump’s tweet are you saying it is not inflammatory??
As for your last statements — of course they are not factual. Not that difficult for me to say…because it is obvious.
But why is it so difficult for some on here to admit when others say inflammatory things and make disingenuous statements? Why does party seem to matter to some on here so much?
Last edited:
Stillwater Townie
Ranger
The price of used upholstered furniture will go up. If it is not stained or too worn it should sell well.
Stillwater Townie
Ranger
By far the reason why the Christian Right love him so much was he put judges on the Supreme Court, so that Roe vs Wade could be overturned. It resulted in little change in the abortion rate because it led to more abortion in the legal states.
Similar threads
