Trump 47

Sen. Mitch McConnell invoked surviving childhood polio in a statement defending his decision to vote against Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s confirmation for secretary of Health and Human Services.

"I will not condone the re-litigation of proven cures, and neither will millions of Americans who credit their survival and quality of life to scientific miracles," Sen. McConnell said.

Sen. McConnell was the only Republican to vote 'no' against RFK Jr.'s confirmation. https://abcnews.visitlink.me/w9eMiX
Having McConnell be the only GOP no on any confirmation is just conformation of how bad things are. Both to show how bad the picks are that he would go against the party, and how little push back that will happen in either house of congress.
 
I had a problem with Tesla (and electric cars in general) prior to the election.

The environment benefits are overrated and I dont see how people manage with them in a rural environment during the winter. The charging time makes long trips more difficult and we lack the infrastructure in general for most of the policy mandates the previous administration to be realistic.
I have a problem with F250s (and pickup trucks in general).

They use a lot of gas. I don't see how people can manage to drive and park them in places like Manhattan or downtown Chicago. They are so high it is hard for the elderly and short stature people to get in and out of them. We lack the urban infrastructure for such large vehicles.
 
I have a problem with F250s (and pickup trucks in general).

They use a lot of gas. I don't see how people can manage to drive and park them in places like Manhattan or downtown Chicago. They are so high it is hard for the elderly and short stature people to get in and out of them. We lack the urban infrastructure for such large vehicles.

Yeah, but when you are 20 and need to move you really like that a buddy had one.

Most vehicles aren't for everyone. I couldn’t imagine living anywhere north of Kansas without 4WD but if you are in LA it wouldn't be worth the cost of buying. If you live in an urban environment with the infrastructure I get the electric thing. Not a fan but I get it.
 
Yeah, but when you are 20 and need to move you really like that a buddy had one.

Most vehicles aren't for everyone. I couldn’t imagine living anywhere north of Kansas without 4WD but if you are in LA it wouldn't be worth the cost of buying. If you live in an urban environment with the infrastructure I get the electric thing. Not a fan but I get it.
No vehicle is for everyone. If you are very rural or long road trips are a large part of your life, an EV is probably not a good choice. Why people feel the need to constantly point out the weaknesses of one type of vehicle but accept the weaknesses of others is beyond me.

I can tell you when it is 12 degrees out never stopping for gas is a huge plus that nobody thinks about. Nearly zero maintenance is another.
 
💩 @CowboyJD TAINT true. Your opinions are just like mine: opinions. Glad to see you can move off of high center occasionally. Don’t compare me to the lunatic fringe on the right side of the spectrum please. That’s disingenuous. But that’s your typical below the belt slam based on the fact I got under your paper thin skin once upon a time. 🖕Hold a grudge much Peri? 😂
Is that you @Rob B. ?

James Franco GIF
 
No vehicle is for everyone. If you are very rural or long road trips are a large part of your life, an EV is probably not a good choice. Why people feel the need to constantly point out the weaknesses of one type of vehicle but accept the weaknesses of others is beyond me.

I can tell you when it is 12 degrees out never stopping for gas is a huge plus that nobody thinks about. Nearly zero maintenance is another.

I was responding to an idiotic statement and not debating the merits of electric vs ICE engines.

Would say the not having to freeze getting gas would be a positive. It's only a couple of minutes but when it's single digits it's a long couple of minutes.
 

Trump Ally and CPAC Chairman Matt Schlapp Accused of Sexually Assaulting Man at Bar in Front of at Least 8 Witnesses​


1739474106459.png


American Conservative Union Chairman Matt Schlapp has been accused of sexually assaulting a man at a bar in a bombshell report released just days before the CPAC’s D.C. Convention.

The allegations, first reported by Yashar Ali, claim that Schlapp made multiple bar patrons uncomfortable before groping a man and being kicked out of the bar.


On Saturday, less than two weeks before the CPAC convention that brings in top conservatives to D.C., Schlapp allegedly followed around and stood close to a multiple groups of men in a Virginia bar, making them uncomfortable. After being confronted by some of the men, Schlapp did not stop, and was grazing his body against men while walking past, according to the report.

“Every time I turned around, this guy was right there, one foot behind me,” the alleged victim told Ali. “And I was just not comfortable with this.”

According to the report, the man’s girlfriend confronted Schlapp as well. After the man asked Schlapp to leave, he “grabbed his genitals while looking him directly in the eyes.”

He was then removed from the bar, but later returned and got into a “heated confrontation,” witnesses said.

CPAC did not immediately respond for comment.


Long-time Trump backer Schlapp has had sexual misconduct allegations involving other men pressed against him before. In 2023, the Daily Beast first reported that a Herschel Walker male staffer claimed that the famed conservative groped him. The staffer, Carlton Huffman, filed a $9 million lawsuit against Schlapp and Mercedes Schlapp, his wife, for battery and defamation. After the allegations were shared with the ACU, Schlapp was never disciplined, according to Ali.

The lawsuit then added two other allegations: one in 2022 and 2017 with no alleged victims named.

After the allegations were added, Huffman released a statement backtracking.

“The claims made in my lawsuits were the result of a complete misunderstanding, and I regret that the lawsuit caused pain to the Schlapp family,” he wrote at the time. “Neither the Schlapps nor the ACU paid me anything to dismiss my claims against them.”


It was later revealed by CNN that Huffman received a $480,000 settlement through “an insurance policy.”

Schlapp said in a statement, “From the beginning, I asserted my innocence... Our family was attacked, especially by a left-wing media that is focused on the destruction of conservatives regardless of the truth and the facts.”

It is unclear what this could mean for the CPAC convention, which starts on Feb. 19. Some of the speakers include Donald Trump, Karoline Leavitt, Ted Cruz, Steve Bannon, Megyn Kelly,
 
Treat me however you want @Rob B.

I’ll keep calling out the loons when they go full looney.
Here I’ll compliment you. For some reason you remind me of the self righteous Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead. Only you are entitled to absolutism, and burn things down for everyone if it’s not to your self absorbed arsonist liking. I’m positive you take it as a great compliment.
 
Here I’ll compliment you. For some reason you remind me of the self righteous Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead. Only you are entitled to absolutism, and burn things down for everyone if it’s not to your self absorbed arsonist liking. I’m positive you take it as a great compliment.
Sick burn @Rob B.

:ROFLMAO:
 
I have a problem with F250s (and pickup trucks in general).

They use a lot of gas. I don't see how people can manage to drive and park them in places like Manhattan or downtown Chicago. They are so high it is hard for the elderly and short stature people to get in and out of them. We lack the urban infrastructure for such large vehicles.

I was responding to an idiotic statement and not debating the merits of electric vs ICE engines.

Would say the not having to freeze getting gas would be a positive. It's only a couple of minutes but when it's single digits it's a long couple of minutes.
Can we at least agree that trucks and SUVs shouldn't have hoods that are 5' off the ground?

How do they see anything close to the front (e.g., kids at school pickup/dropoff)? Other people cant see around them at intersections, their headlights are blinding at night to cars in front, if they get in a wreck they're more likely to end up on top of a smaller car...

Yes, I know everyone could drive something taller and it's my choice to not drive one, but why do we need to race to the sky with cars? It costs money, gas, materials...
 
Can we at least agree that trucks and SUVs shouldn't have hoods that are 5' off the ground?

How do they see anything close to the front (e.g., kids at school pickup/dropoff)? Other people cant see around them at intersections, their headlights are blinding at night to cars in front, if they get in a wreck they're more likely to end up on top of a smaller car...

Yes, I know everyone could drive something taller and it's my choice to not drive one, but why do we need to race to the sky with cars? It costs money, gas, materials...
Because I have a farm and have to drive through pastures and creeks haul trailers all the time load it down and use it. Having a hood 5 ft off the ground implies extra ground clearance which is very useful for these things. Not my fault a bunch of Urban Rednecks think it's cool and buy them to drive around town. They are designed that way because that's what people who actually use them want and need.
 
Can we at least agree that trucks and SUVs shouldn't have hoods that are 5' off the ground?

How do they see anything close to the front (e.g., kids at school pickup/dropoff)? Other people cant see around them at intersections, their headlights are blinding at night to cars in front, if they get in a wreck they're more likely to end up on top of a smaller car...

Yes, I know everyone could drive something taller and it's my choice to not drive one, but why do we need to race to the sky with cars? It costs money, gas, materials...
Kills more pedestrians, too


Vehicles with especially tall front ends are most dangerous to pedestrians, but a blunt profile makes medium-height vehicles deadly too, new research from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety shows.


Whatever their nose shape, pickups, SUVs and vans with a hood height greater than 40 inches are about 45 percent more likely to cause fatalities in pedestrian crashes than cars and other vehicles with a hood height of 30 inches or less and a sloping profile, an IIHS study of nearly 18,000 pedestrian crashes found. However, among vehicles with hood heights between 30 and 40 inches, a blunt, or more vertical, front end increases the risk to pedestrians.
 
Because I have a farm and have to drive through pastures and creeks haul trailers all the time load it down and use it. Having a hood 5 ft off the ground implies extra ground clearance which is very useful for these things. Not my fault a bunch of Urban Rednecks think it's cool and buy them to drive around town. They are designed that way because that's what people who actually use them want and need.
Do you do that in a $75k+ F250 platinum?

Strange how that was done for decades before these appeared 5-10 years ago.

Edit to clarify.
Not trying to say no one needs the height, but it shouldn't be the near default for all new trucks and should be pretty rare and almost non existent for SUVs.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top